Skip to main content

The History of Animal Ethics in Western Culture

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Psychology of the Human-Animal Bond

Abstract

This chapter is intended as an overview of the major trends of the development of Western attitudes to animals from early biblical times to the present. Although Western culture, in its subservience to commercial, industrial and technological innovation, has scarcely been what is commonly called “at one with nature,” a concern with the status of our fellow animal relatives has never been entirely absent from Western consciousness. The history of animal ethics in Western culture is not, however, a story of a consistent ethic in any one era developing into a different ethic in a succeeding era. Rather, it is the evolution of an unresolved debate in which adversaries offer alternative conceptions of the human–animal relationship and alternative conceptions of our obligation to our fellow animals.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Quoted in Whitlock and Westerlund (1975), p. 36. Spelling modernized.

  2. 2.

    Quoted in Nicholson and Preece (1999), p. 72.

  3. 3.

    Quoted in Harwood (1928), p. 104.

  4. 4.

    Quoted in the original French in Boas (1932), p. 141.

  5. 5.

    Quoted in Lovejoy (1933), p. 124.

  6. 6.

    A. O. Lovejoy. The Great Chain of Being, p. 186.

  7. 7.

    This does not invalidate the earlier statement on the failure of Cartesianism in its animal sentience dimensions. These neo-Cartesians did not doubt the sentience of animals, indeed they relied on it, but still regarded the human as a being on an entirely different plane from other animals.

  8. 8.

    Quoted in Sharpe (1989), p. 89.

  9. 9.

    Albert Leffingwell, “Does Vivisection Pay?”, Scribner’s Monthly, July 1880, 1.

  10. 10.

    The Manifesto of the Humanitarian League, excerpted in G. Hendrick and W. Hendrick (1989), p. 43.

  11. 11.

    Quoted from Seventy Years Among Savages in G. Hendrick and W. Hendrick (1989), p. 113.

  12. 12.

    Quoted in Hendrick (1977), p. 193.

  13. 13.

    Quoted from Salt (1905), p. ix.

  14. 14.

    J. Howard Moore, The Universal Kinship, xxxv.

  15. 15.

    Quoted from Seventy Years Among Savages in The Savour of Salt, ed. Hendrick and Hendrick, 55.

  16. 16.

    Quoted from “The Complaints of the Birds and Fowls of Heaven to their Creator for the Oppressions and Violences Most Nations on Earth do Offer Them” in The Country-man’s Companion (1683) in Preece and Chamberlain (1993), p. 73.

References

  • Boas, G. (1932). The Happy Beast in French Thought of the Seventeenth Century. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bolingbroke, L. (1754). The Works of Henry St. John, Lord Viscount Bolingbroke (Vol. 5). (Reprint London: D. Mallet, 1809).

    Google Scholar 

  • Brontë, A. (1847). Agnes Grey. (Reprint, London: Penguin, 1988).

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, W. (1883). Heart and Science: A Story of the Present Time. (Reprint, Peterborough: Broadview, 1996).

    Google Scholar 

  • Drummond, W. H. (2005). The Rights of Animals, and Man’s Obligation to Treat them with Humanity (1838). (Reprint; ed. Rod Preece and Chien-hui Li (Lampeter: Mellen Press)).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ganzfried, R. S. (1977). Code of Jewish Law (bk. 4, ch. 19, 184). New York: Hebrew Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harwood, D. (1928). Love for Animals and How it Developed in Great Britain. (Reprint, ed. Rod Preece and David Fraser, Lampeter: Mellen, 2003).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hendrick, G. (1977). Henry Salt: Humanitarian Reformer and Man of Letters. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • G. Hendrick, & W. Hendrick (Eds.). (1989). The Savour of Salt: A Henry Salt Anthology. Fontwell: Centaur.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kant, I. (1785). Grundlagen zur Metaphysik der Sitten. (Reprint, Hamburg: Meiner, 1994).

    Google Scholar 

  • Leffingwell, A. (1907). The Vivisection Question (2nd ed.). Chicago: The Vivisection Reform Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lovejoy, A. O. (1933). The Great Chain of Being: A Study in the History of Ideas. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nicholson, G., & Preece, R. (Ed.). (1999). On the Primeval Diet of Man (1801). Lampeter: Mellen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Preece, R., & Chamberlain, L. (1993). Animal Welfare and Human Values. Waterloo: Wilfrid Laurier University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ray, J. (1691). The Wisdom of God Manifested in the Works of Creation. (Reprint, New York: Garland, 1979).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ritson, J. (1803). An Essay on Abstinence from Animal Food as a Moral Duty. London: Richard Phillips.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell, B. (1931). “If animals could talk.” In H. Ruja (Ed.), Morals and others: Bertrand Russell’s American essays 1931–1935. Excerpted in Paul A. B. Clarke & A. Linzey (eds.), Political theory and animal rights. London: Pluto Press, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salt, H. (1892). Animals’ Rights Considered in Relation to Social Progress. (Reprint, preface by Peter Singer, Society for Animal Rights, Inc.: Clark Summit, Pa., 1980).

    Google Scholar 

  • Salt, H. (1905). Company I Have Kept. In C. Magel (Ed.), Introduction to J. Howard Moore, The Universal Kinship. (Reprint, Fontwell: Centuar, 1992).

    Google Scholar 

  • Salt, H. (1935). The Creed of Kinship. London: Constable.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharpe, R. (1989). Animal Experiments - A Failed Technology. In G. Langley (Ed.), Animal Experimentation: The Consensus Changes. New York: Chapman and Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitlock, E., & Westerlund, S. R. (1975). Humane Education: An Overview. Tulsa, OK: The National association for the Advancement of Humane Education.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rod Preece .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Preece, R. (2011). The History of Animal Ethics in Western Culture. In: Blazina, C., Boyraz, G., Shen-Miller, D. (eds) The Psychology of the Human-Animal Bond. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-9761-6_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics