Skip to main content

Descent and Landing

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Interplanetary Outpost

Part of the book series: Springer Praxis Books ((SPACEE))

  • 2286 Accesses

Abstract

The most dangerous phase of the mission will be landing on Callisto - an event requiring a highly complex series of stages, each of which must be performed flawlessly with little or no margin for error. The first consideration for those tasked with designing the descent and landing architecture is the fact that Callisto has virtually no atmosphere, which means the descent must be propulsive. Next, since Callisto’s rugged terrain makes landing-site selection very difficult, pinpoint accuracy will be reqnired to ensure the Shackleton’s orbit-to-surface shuttle (which we'll christen the ‘Dauntless’) lands at a safe landing site. To achieve this, much of the descent and landing trajectory will be automated but, before discussing the myriad systems involved, let's take a look at what the Dauntless might look like.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 44.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Reference

  1. Kordas, J.F.; Lewis, LT.; Wilson, B.A.; Nielsen, D.P.; Park, H.; Priest, R.E.; Hills, R.F.; Shannon, M.J.; Ledebuhr, A.G.; Pleasance, L.D. Star Tracker Stellar Compass for the Clementine Mission. SPlE, Vol. 2466, pp. 72-83 (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Honeywell. Q-Flex QA2000 Accelerometer (2000), available online at www.davidson. com.aufproductsfinertialsystemsfhoneywellfpdf!qa2000.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  3. Wertz, J.R.; Larson, W.J. Space Mission Analysis and Design, 3rd edn. Space Technology Library (1999).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Johnson, A.; Ansar, A.; Matthies, L.; Trawny, N.; Mourikis, A.I.; Roumeliotis

    Google Scholar 

  5. S.I. A General Approach to Terrain Relative Navigation for Planetary Landing. Procedures of the 2007 AIAA Infotech at Aerospace Conference, May 7-10(2007).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Hunt, E.; Joslyn, S. A Functional Task Analysis of Time-Pressured Decision Making. In: J.M. Schraagen, S.F. Chipman, and V.L. Shalin (eds), CognitiveTask Analysis. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc., Mahwah, NJ (2000).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Gaskell, R. Determination of Landmark Topography from Imaging Data. Proceedings of the AAS/AIAA Astrodynamics Specialists Conference, Paper #AAS 02-021 (2002).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Erik Seedhouse M.Med.Sc., Ph.D., FBIS .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Seedhouse, E. (2011). Descent and Landing. In: Interplanetary Outpost. Springer Praxis Books(). Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-9748-7_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-9748-7_6

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4419-9747-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4419-9748-7

  • eBook Packages: Physics and AstronomyPhysics and Astronomy (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics