Overall and Local Movement Speeds During Fire Drill Evacuations in Buildings up to 31 Stories
The time that it takes an occupant population to reach safety when descending a stairwell during building evacuations is typically described by measureable engineering variables such as stairwell geometry, speed, density, and pre-evacuation delay. In turn, engineering models of building evacuation use these variables to predict the performance of egress systems for building design, emergency planning, or event reconstruction. As part of a program to better understand occupant movement and behavior during building emergencies, the Building and Fire Research Laboratory at the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) has been collecting stairwell movement data during fire drill evacuations of office buildings. These data collections are intended to provide a better understanding of this principal building egress feature and develop a technical foundation for future codes and standards requirements. To date, NIST has collected fire drill evacuation data in eight office building occupancies ranging from six to 62 stories in height that have included a range of stairwell widths and occupant densities.
While average movement speeds in the current study of 0.48 m/s ± 0.16 m/s are observed to be quite similar to the range of literature values, local movement speeds as occupants traverse down the stairwell are seen to vary widely within a given stairwell, ranging from 0.056 m/s to 1.7 m/s.
KeywordsObesity Smoke Riser
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 1.Kuligowski, E.D., R. D. Peacock: Review of building evacuation models. Technical Note 1471, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD, 2005.Google Scholar
- 2.Gwynne, S., E. R. Galea, M. Owen, P. J. Lawrence: Further Validation of the buildingEXODUS Evacuation Model Using the Tsukuba Dataset. Rep. No. 98/IM/31, University of Greenwich, London, 1998.Google Scholar
- 3.Gwynne, S., E. R. Galea, M. Owen, P. J. Lawrence: Validation of the buildingEXODUS Evacuation Model. Rep. No. 98/IM/29, University of Greenwich, London, 1998.Google Scholar
- 4.Lord, J., B. Meacham, B. Moore, R. Fahy, G. Proulx: Guide for evaluating the predictive capabilities of computer egress models. GCR 06-886, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD, 2005.Google Scholar
- 5.Peacock, R.D., J. D. Averill, E. D. Kuligowski,: Stairwell evacuation from buildings: What we know we don’t know. In Pedestrian and Evacuation Dynamics 2008, ed. W. W. F. Klingsch, C. Rogsch, A. Schadschneider, and M. Schreckenberg. NewYork: Springer, 2010.Google Scholar
- 6.G. Proulx. Movement of People: The Evacuation Timing, chapter 3-13, pages 3-341 – 3-366. In The SFPE Handbook of Fire Protection Engineering. Society of Fire Protection Engineers, Bethesda, MD, third edition, 2002.Google Scholar
- 7.Fruin, J.J. Pedestrian Planning and Design, Revised Edition). ElevatorWorld, Inc., Mobile, AL, 1987.Google Scholar
- 8.Averill, J. D., D. S. Mileti, R. D. Peacock, E. D. Kuligowski, N. Groner, G. Proulx, P. A. Reneke, and H. E. Nelson. Federal Building and Fire Safety Investigation of the World Trade Center Disaster: Occupant Behavior, Egress, and Emergency Communication. NIST NCSTAR 1-7. National Institute of Standards and Technology. Gaithersburg, MD, 2005.Google Scholar
- 9.Galea, E. D., L. Hylse, R. Day, A. Siddiqui, G. Sharp, K. Boyce, L. Summerfield, D. Canter, M. Marselle, and P. V. Greeall, “The UK WTC 9/11 Evacuation Study: An Overview of the Methodologies Employed and Some Preliminary Analysis.” In Pedestrian and Evacuation Dynamics 2008, ed. W. W. F. Klingsch, C. Rogsch, A. Schadschneider, and M. Schreckenberg. NewYork: Springer, 2010.Google Scholar
- 10.Pauls, J. L., Effective-Width Model for Evacuation Flow in Buildings. In Proceedings, Engineering Applications Workshop, Society of Fire Protection Engineers, Boston, 1980.Google Scholar
- 11.Predtechenskii, V.M. and Milinskii, A.I., Planning for Foot Traffic Flow in Buildings, Amerind Publishing Company, Inc., New Delhi, 1978.Google Scholar