Advertisement

Peace Dividend and Regional Stability on the Korean Peninsula: Focusing on the South–North Korea Cooperation Fund Allocation

  • B. Jeong
Chapter
Part of the The Political Economy of the Asia Pacific book series (PEAP)

Abstract

This chapter delves into the concept of a peace dividend on the Korean Peninsula with an attempt to establish a Northeast Asia security community. Starting with an examination of the background of the peace dividend concept and the regional situation in Northeast Asia compared to those on the global level, this chapter asserts that this concept can be leveraged as a tool for facilitating change in regard to dynamism among the government, nongovernmental organizations, and private companies in the three-domain model. This chapter employs the South–North Korea Cooperation Fund as proxy data that demonstrate the two approaches based on the peace dividend – mobilization of civil society and the market.

Keywords

Civil Society Economic Cooperation Korean Peninsula Nuclear Weapon Nongovernmental Organization 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. A comprehensive overview of private and nongovernmental organizations in South Korea (2003). Citizen’s Newspaper. Seoul: Citizen’s Newspaper.Google Scholar
  2. Cohen, J. L., & Arato, A. (1992). Civil Society and Political Theory. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  3. Doyle, M. W. (1986). Liberalism and World Politics. The American Political Science Review, 80, 4: 1151–1169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Edwards, M., & Gaventa, J. (2001). Global Citizen Action. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner Publishers.Google Scholar
  5. Feffer, J. (2008). Asia’s Hidden Arms Race. Asia-Pacific Freeze. http://pacificfreeze.ips-dc.org/2008/08/the-growing-military-industrial-complex-in-asia/.
  6. Global Security (2009). World Wide Military Expenditures. http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/world/spending.htm (accessed August 6, 2009).
  7. Gupta, S., Clements, B., Bhattacharya, R., & Chakravarti, S. (2002). The Elusive Peace Dividend. Finance and Development, 39, 4.Google Scholar
  8. Ikenberry, G. J. (2005). Power and liberal order: America’s postwar world order in transition. International Relations of the Asia-Pacific, 5: 133–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Jeong, B. (2003). A study on the role distribution of government and NGOs: Focused on humanitarian policy toward North Korea. Master’s thesis, Seoul National University, Seoul.Google Scholar
  10. Keohane, R. (1984). After Hegemony: Cooperation and Discord in the World Political Economy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Knight, M., Loayza, N., & Villanueva, D. (1996). The Peace Dividend: Military Spending Cuts and Economic Growth. World Bank & International Monetary Fund.Google Scholar
  12. Lee, C. -D. (2009). U.S. worried about regional arms race due to N. Korea. Yonhap News, July 23 edition.Google Scholar
  13. Lindenberg, M., & Bryant, C. (2001). Going Global Transforming Relief and Development NGOs. Bloomfield, CT: Kumarian Press.Google Scholar
  14. Martinussen, J. (1997). Society, State and Market: A Guide to Competing Theories of Development. London & New York, NY: Zed Books Ltd.Google Scholar
  15. Ministry of National Defense (2008). White Paper on National Defense. Seoul: Ministry of National Defense.Google Scholar
  16. Ministry of Unification (2008). White Paper on South-North Cooperation Fund. Open image in new window. Seoul: Utgo Publisher Open image in new window.Google Scholar
  17. Salmon, A. (2007). Cutting the Korean Discount. Forbes.Com. http://www.forbes.com/global/2007/0521/034.html
  18. Seliger, B. (2008). A Peace Dividend for North Korea?: The Political Economy of Military Spending, Conflict Resolution, and Reform. Paper presented at conference Toward a Northeast Asian Security Community: Implications for Korea’s Growth and Economic Development, Washington D.C. http://www.keia.org/Publications/Other/HS-Seliger.pdf.
  19. Seonam Forum (2006). White Paper on Solidarity Movement Organizations in East Asia. Open image in new window Seoul Arche Open image in new window.Google Scholar
  20. Stockholm International Peace Research Institute (2009). Expenditure by region in constant US dollars http://www.sipri.org/research/armaments/milex/resultoutput/sources_methods/definitions (accessed July 26, 2009).
  21. UNDP (1994). Human Development Report 1994: New Dimensions of Human Security. United Nations Development Programme.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Graduate School of Public and International Affairs, University of PittsburghPittsburghUSA

Personalised recommendations