Abstract
There is a close relationship between learners’ affective states and the operation of working memory. When instructional support provided to learners is not tailored to levels of their prior knowledge, the resulting working memory overload may emotionally upset and de-motivate learners and thus influence the learning outcomes. The inclusion of affective and motivational factors in cognitive load research, particularly in studies of the expertise reversal effect, remains an essential direction for future research in this area. Establishing connections between affective variables and cognitive load factors, and using methods of affective computing could enhance capabilities of multimedia environments in tailoring learning to cognitive characteristics of individual learners. The chapter focuses primarily on features of our cognitive architecture that are directly related to the expertise reversal effect, main empirical findings associated with this effect in multimedia learning environments, and their implications for research in affective learner-tailored multimedia environments.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Baddeley, A. D. (1986). Working memory. New York: Oxford University Press.
Bell, B. S., & Kozlowski, S. W. J. (2002). Adaptive guidance: Enhancing self-regulation, knowledge, and performance in technology-based training. Personnel Psychology., 55, 267–306.
Braarud, P. O. (2001). Subjective task complexity and subjective workload: Criterion validity for complex team tasks. International Journal of Cognitive Ergonomics, 5, 261–273.
Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L., & Cocking, R. R. (Eds.). (1999). How people learn: Mind, brain, experience, and school. Washington: National Academy Press.
Brünken, R., Plass, J., & Leutner, D. (2003). Direct measurement of cognitive load in multimedia learning. Educational Psychologist, 38, 53–61.
Brusilovsky, P. (2001). Adaptive hypermedia. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interactions, 11, 87–110.
Calisir, F., & Gurel, Z. (2003). Influence of text structure and prior knowledge of the learner on reading comprehension, browsing and perceived control. Computers in Human Behavior., 19, 135–145.
Chung, J., & Reigeluth, C. M. (1992). Instructional prescriptions for learner control. Educational Technology., 32, 14–20.
Corbalan, G., Kester, L., & van Merriënboer, J. J. G. (2006). Towards a personalized task selection model with shared instructional control. Instructional Science, 34, 399–422.
Cowan, N. (2001). The magical number 4 in short-term memory: A reconsideration of mental storage capacity. Behavioral and Brain Sciences., 24, 87–114.
Craig, S. D., Graesser, A. C., Sullins, J., & Gholson, B. (2004). Affect and learning: an exploratory look into the role of affect in learning with auto tutor. Journal of Educational Media, 29, 241–250.
D’Mello, S., & Graesser, A. C. (2010). Multimodal semi-automated affect detection from conversational cues, gross body language, and facial features. User Modeling and User-adapted Interaction., 20(2), 147–187.
DeStefano, D., & LeFevre, J.-A. (2007). Cognitive load in hypertext reading: A review. Computers in Human Behavior., 23, 1616–1641.
Eggemeier, F. T. (1988). Properties of workload assessment techniques. In P. A. Hancock & N. Meshkati (Eds.), Human mental workload (pp. 41–62). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Ericsson, K. A., & Kintsch, W. (1995). Long-term working memory. Psychological Review, 102, 211–245.
Eysenck, M. W. (1982). Attention and arousal: Cognition and performance. Berlin: Springer.
Geary, D. (2007). Educating the evolved mind: Conceptual foundations for an evolutionary educational psychology. In J. S. Carlson & J. R. Levin (Eds.), Psychological perspectives on contemporary educational issues (pp. 1–99). Greenwich: Information Age Publishing.
Gerjets, P., & Scheiter, K. (2007). Learner control in hypermedia environments. Educational Psychology Review., 19, 285–307.
Ghazarian, A., & Noorhosseini, S. M. (2010). Automatic detection of users’ skill levels using high-frequency user interface events. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interactions., 20(2), 109–146. doi: 10.1007/s11257-010-9073-5.
Hegarty, M., Kriz, S., & Cate, C. (2003). The roles of mental animations and external animations in understanding mechanical systems. Cognition and Instruction., 21, 325–360.
Jacobson, M. J. (1994). Issues in hypertext and hypermedia research: Toward a framework for linking theory-to-design. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia., 3(2), 141–154.
Kalyuga, S. (2006a). Assessment of learners’ organized knowledge structures in adaptive learning environments. Applied Cognitive Psychology., 20, 333–342.
Kalyuga, S. (2006b). Rapid assessment of learners’ proficiency: A cognitive load approach. Educational Psychology., 26, 613–627.
Kalyuga, S. (2006c). Rapid cognitive assessment of learners’ knowledge structures. Learning and Instruction., 16, 1–11.
Kalyuga, S. (2007). Expertise reversal effect and its implications for learner-tailored instruction. Educational Psychology Review., 19, 509–539.
Kalyuga, S. (2008a). Relative effectiveness of animated and static diagrams: An effect of learner prior knowledge. Computers in Human Behavior., 24, 852–861.
Kalyuga, S. (2008b). When less is more in cognitive diagnosis: A rapid assessment method for adaptive learning environments. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100, 603–612.
Kalyuga, S., Chandler, P., & Sweller, J. (1998). Levels of expertise and instructional design. Human Factors., 40, 1–17.
Kalyuga, S., Chandler, P., & Sweller, J. (2000). Incorporating learner experience into the design of multimedia instruction. Journal of Educational Psychology., 92, 126–136.
Kalyuga, S., & Sweller, J. (2004). Measuring knowledge to optimize cognitive load factors during instruction. Journal of Educational Psychology., 96, 558–568.
Kalyuga, S., & Sweller, J. (2005). Rapid dynamic assessment of expertise to improve the efficiency of adaptive e-learning. Educational Technology Research and Development., 53, 83–93.
Lee, H., Plass, J. L., & Homer, B. D. (2006). Optimizing cognitive load for learning from computer-based science simulations. Journal of Educational Psychology., 98, 902–913.
Linnenbrink, E. A., & Pintrich, P. R. (2002). The role of motivational beliefs in conceptual change. In M. Limon & L. Mason (Eds.), Reconsidering conceptual change: Issues in theory and practice (pp. 115–135). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Mayer, R. E. (1997). Multimedia learning: Are we asking the right questions? Educational Psychologist., 32, 1–19.
Mayer, R. E. (2009). Multimedia learning. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Mayer, R., & Gallini, J. (1990). When is an illustration worth ten thousand words? Journal of Educational Psychology., 82, 715–726.
Miller, G. A. (1956). The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psychological Review, 63, 81–97.
Moray, N. (1982). Subjective mental workload. Human Factors, 24, 25–40.
Mousavi, S. Y., Low, R., & Sweller, J. (1995). Reducing cognitive load by mixing auditory and visual presentation modes. Journal of Educational Psychology., 87, 319–334.
Niemec, P., Sikorski, C., & Walberg, H. (1996). Learner-control effects: A review of reviews and a meta-analysis. Journal of Educational Computing Research., 15, 157–174.
O’Donnell, R. D., & Eggemeier, F. T. (1986). Workload assessment methodology. In K. R. Boff, L. Kaufman, & J. P. Thomas (Eds.), Handbook of perception and human performance (Chapter 42) (Vol. 2, pp. 1–49). New York: Wiley.
Paas, F., Tuovinen, J., Tabbers, H., & van Gerven, P. (2003). Cognitive load measurement as a means to advance cognitive load theory. Educational Psychologist, 38, 63–71.
Paas, F., Tuovinen, J. E., van Merrienboer, J. J. G., & Darabi, A. A. (2005). A motivational perspctive on the relation between mental effort and performance. Educational Technology Research and Development, 53, 25–34.
Park, O.-C., & Hopkins, R. (1993). Instructional conditions for using dynamic visual displays. Instructional Science., 21, 427–449.
Pollock, E., Chandler, P., & Sweller, J. (2002). Assimilating complex information. Learning and Instruction., 12, 61–86.
Potelle, H., & Rouet, J. F. (2003). Effects of content representation and readers’ prior knowledge on the comprehension of hypertext. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies., 58, 327–345.
Schnotz, W. (2010). Reanalyzing the expertise reversal effect. Instructional Science, 38, 315–323.
Schnotz, W., & Rasch, T. (2005). Enabling, facilitating, and inhibiting effects of animations in multimedia learning: Why reduction of cognitive load can have negative results on learning. Educational Technology Research and Development., 53, 47–58.
Shiffrin, R., & Schneider, W. (1977). Controlled and automatic human information processing: II. Perceptual learning, automatic attending, and a general theory. Psychological Review., 84, 127–190.
Shin, E. C., Schallert, D. L., & Savenye, W. C. (1994). Effects of learner control, advisement, and prior knowledge on young students’ learning in a hypertext environment. Educational Technology Research and Development., 42, 33–46.
Shute, V. J. (2008). Focus on formative feedback. Review of Educational Research, 78, 153–189.
Simon, H. A. (1967). Motivational and emotional controls of cognition. Psychological Review, 74, 29–39.
Simons, K. D., & Klein, J. D. (2007). The impact of scaffolding and student achievement levels in a problem-based learning environment. Instructional Science., 35, 41–72.
Spiro, R. J., Feltovich, P. J., Jacobson, M. J., & Coulson, R. L. (1991). Knowledge representation, content specification, and the development of skill in situation-specific knowledge assembly: Some constructvist issues as they relate to cognitive flexibility theory and hypertext. Educational Technology., 31(9), 22–25.
Sweller, J. (2010). Element interactivity and intrinsic, extraneous, and germane cognitive load. Educational Psychology Review, 22, 123–138.
Sweller, J., Chandler, P., Tierney, P., & Cooper, M. (1990). Cognitive load and selective attention as factors in the structuring of technical material. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General., 119, 176–192.
Tindall-Ford, S., Chandler, P., & Sweller, J. (1997). When two sensory modes are better than one. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied., 3(4), 257–287.
Tobias, S. (1989). Another look at research on the adaptation of instruction to student characteristics. Educational Psychologist, 24, 213–227.
Tobias, S. (2010). The expertise reversal effect and aptitude treatment interaction research. Instructional Science, 38, 309–314.
Tversky, B., Morrison, J. B., & Betrancourt, M. (2002). Animation: Does it facilitate learning? International Journal of Human-Computer Studies., 57, 247–262.
Van Merriënboer, J. J. G., Sluijsmans, D., Corbalan, G., Kalyuga, S., Paas, F., & Tattersall, C. (2006). Performance assessment and learning task selection in environments for complex learning. In D. Clark & J. Elen (Eds.), Advances in learning and instruction (pp. 201–220). Amsterdam: Elsevier Science.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2011 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Kalyuga, S. (2011). Cognitive Load in Adaptive Multimedia Learning. In: Calvo, R., D'Mello, S. (eds) New Perspectives on Affect and Learning Technologies. Explorations in the Learning Sciences, Instructional Systems and Performance Technologies, vol 3. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-9625-1_15
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-9625-1_15
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4419-9624-4
Online ISBN: 978-1-4419-9625-1
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)