Abstract
Despite the increasing number of studies investigating patterns of learner affective states, it is not yet clear to what degree student affective states vary among learning systems, and whether specific learning systems are associated with characteristic patterns of learner affect. In this chapter, we attempt to shed light on this question by discussing the incidence and persistence of affective states across seven learning environments, studied with an identical observation protocol in high schools in the Philippines. The studies, when taken together, reveal several patterns that transcend learning environment, domain, and population. Engaged concentration was the most common affective state, by a large margin, in all studies run in private schools in the Philippines; confusion was slightly more common than engaged concentration in the two public school studies. Delight was more common in the games than the other environments, but engaged concentration was not more prevalent, somewhat contrary to prior theory. Across all seven learning environments, boredom was persistent. Other negative affective states, such as frustration, were considerably less persistent. Educational games appeared to disrupt frustration more than intelligent tutors. Engaged concentration was persistent in many but not all studies.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Aleven, V., & Koedinger, K. R. (2000). Limitations of student control: Do students know when they need help? Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Intelligent Tutoring Systems (pp. 292–303). London: Springer.
Anderson, J. R., Corbett, A. T., Koedinger, K. R., & Pelletier, R. (1995). Cognitive tutors: Lessons learned’. The Journal of the Learning Sciences., 4, 167–207.
Baker, R. S. J. d., Corbett, A. T., Roll, I., & Koedinger, K. R. (2008). Developing a generalizable detector of when students game the system. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction: the Journal of Personalization Research, 18(3), 287–314.
Baker, R. S. J. d., D’Mello, S. K., Rodrigo, M. M. T., & Graesser, A. C. (2010). Better to be frustrated than bored: the incidence, persistence, and impact of learners’ cognitive-affective states during interactions with three different computer-based learning environments. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 68(4), 223–241.
Baker, R. S. J. d., Corbett, A. T., Koedinger, K. R., & Wagner, A. Z. (2004). Off-task behavior in the cognitive tutor classroom: When students “Game the system”. Proceedings of ACM CHI 2004: Computer-Human Interaction (pp. 383–390). Washington, DC: Association for ComputÂing Machinery.
Calvo, R. A., & D’Mello, S. (2011). Introduction. In R. Calvo & S. D’Mello (Eds.), Explorations in the learning sciences, instructional systems and performance technologies. New York: Springer.
Cooper, D. G., Arroyo, I., & Woolf, B. P. (2011). Actionable affective processing for automatic tutor interventions. In R. Calvo & S. D’Mello (Eds.), Explorations in the learning sciences, instructional systems and performance technologies. New York: Springer.
Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1990). Flow: The psychology of optimal experience. New York: Harper and Row.
D’Mello, S., Lehman, B., & Graesser, A. (2011). A motivationally supportive affect-sensitive autotutor. In R. Calvo & S. D’Mello (Eds.), Explorations in the learning sciences, instructional systems and performance technologies. New York: Springer.
D’Mello, S. K., Taylor, R. S., & Graesser, A. (2007). Monitoring affective trajectories during Âcomplex learning. In D. S. McNamara & J. G. Trafton (Eds.), Proceedings of the 29th Annual Cognitive Science Society (pp. 203–208). Austin: Cognitive Science Society.
Davidson and Associates. (1997). Math Blaster 9–12 [Computer Software].
D’Mello, S. K., Craig, S. D., Witherspoon, A., McDaniel, B., & Graesser, A. (2005). Integrating affect sensors in an intelligent tutoring system. Proceedings of Affective Interactions: The Computer in the Affective Loop Workshop (pp. 7–13). Washington, DC: Association for Computing Machinery.
Forbes-Riley, K., Litman, D., & Friedberg, H. (2011). Annotating disengagement for spoken Âdialogue computer tutoring. In R. Calvo & S. D’Mello (Eds.), Explorations in the learning sciences, instructional systems and performance technologies. New York: Springer.
Gee, J. P. (2003). What video games have to teach us about learning and literacy. Hampshire: Palgrave MacMillan.
Koedinger, K. R., & Corbett, A. T. (2006). Cognitive tutors: Technology bringing learning sciences to the classroom. In R. K. Sawyer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (pp. 61–77). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Lester, J. C., McQuiggan, S. W., & Sabourin, J. L. (2011). Affect recognition and expression in narrative-centered learning environments. In R. Calvo & S. D’Mello (Eds.), Explorations in the learning sciences, instructional systems and performance technologies. New York: Springer.
Luckin, R., & du Boulay, B. (1999). Ecolab: The development and evaluation of a Vygostskian design framework. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence, 10, 198–220.
Nicaud, J.-F., Bouhineau, D., & Chaachoua, H. (2004). Mixing microworld and CAS features in building computer systems that help students learn algebra. International Journal of Computers for Mathematical Learning, 9, 169–211.
Nicaud, J. F., Bouhineau, D., Mezerette, S., & Andre, N. (2007). Aplusix II [Computer software].
Rebolledo-Mendez, G. (2003). Motivational modelling in a Vygotskyan ITS. Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education (pp. 537–538). Amsterdam: IOS Press.
Rebolledo-Mendez, G., du Boulay, B., & Luckin, R. (2006) Motivating the learner: an empirical evaluation. Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Intelligent Tutoring Systems (pp. 545–554). Heidelberg, Springer: Germany.
Rebolledo-Mendez, G., Luckin, R., & du Boulay, B. (2011). Designing adaptive motivational scaffolding for a tutoring system. In R. Calvo & S. D’Mello (Eds.), Explorations in the learning sciences, instructional systems and performance technologies. New York: Springer.
Rodrigo, M. M. T. (2003). Tradition or transformation? An evaluation of ICTs in Metro Manila schools. Information Technology for Development, 10(2), 95–122.
Rodrigo, M. M. T. (2005). Quantifying the divide: A comparison of ICT usage of schools in metro manila and IEA-surveyed countries. International Journal of Educational Development, 25, 53–68.
Rodrigo, M. M. T. (2011). The dynamics of students’ affective transitions while using a pre-Âalgebra game. Simulation and Gaming, 42(1), 85–99.
Rodrigo, M. M. T., Agapito, J., Nabos, J., Repalam, M. C., Reyes, S. Jr., & Baker, R. S. J. d. (in preparation). The effects of an embodied conversational agent on student affective dynamics while using an intelligent tutoring system.
Rodrigo, M. M. T., Baker, R. S. J. d., Lagud, M. C. V., Lim, S. A. L., Macapanpan, A. F., Pascua, S. A. M. S., Santillano, J. Q., Sevilla, L. R. S., Sugay, J. O., Tep, S., Viehland, N. J. B. (2007) Affect and usage choices in simulation problem solving environments. Proceedings of Artificial Intelligence in Education 2007 (pp. 145–152). IOS Press, Amsterdam.
Rodrigo, M. M. T., Rebolledo-Mendez, G., Baker, R. S. J. d., du Boulay, B., Sugay, J. O., Lim, S. A. L., Lahoz, M. B. E., & Luckin, R. (2008). The effects of motivational modeling on affect in an intelligent tutoring system. Proceedings of the International Conference on Computers in Education 2008 (pp. 49–56). Asia-Pacific Society for Computers in Education. Taipei, Taiwan.
Schofield, J. W. (1995). Computers and classroom culture. Cambrige: Cambridge University Press.
Sierra Online. (2001). The Incredible Machine: Even More Contraptions [Computer Software].
Acknowledgments
We thank the Philippines Department of Science and Technology (DOST) Engineering Research and Development for Technology Consortium for the grant entitled “Multidimensional Analysis of User-Machine Interactions Towards the Development of Models of Affect,” the DOST Philippine Council for Advanced Science and Technology Research and Development for the grant entitled “Development of Affect-Sensitive Interfaces,” the Ateneo de Manila University and the Pittsburgh Science of Learning Center (National Science Foundation) via grant “Toward a Decade of PSLC Research,” award number SBE-0836012. We thank all the graduate students and colleagues who volunteered as coders. We thank the Ateneo Center for Educational Development, the Department of Information Systems and Computer Science of the Ateneo de Manila University and the faculty, staff, and students of Ateneo de Manila High School, Kostka School of Quezon City, School of the Holy Spirit Quezon City, St. Alphonsus Liguori Integrated School, St. Paul’s College Pasig, and Ramon Magsaysay Cubao High School for their support in this project. We also thank Jean-Francois Nicaud and Genaro Rebolledo-Mendez for making their learning software available for use in our research.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2011 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Rodrigo, M.M.T., Baker, R.S.J.d. (2011). Comparing the Incidence and Persistence of Learners’ Affect During Interactions with Different Educational Software Packages. In: Calvo, R., D'Mello, S. (eds) New Perspectives on Affect and Learning Technologies. Explorations in the Learning Sciences, Instructional Systems and Performance Technologies, vol 3. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-9625-1_14
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-9625-1_14
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4419-9624-4
Online ISBN: 978-1-4419-9625-1
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)