Skip to main content

Born to Cooperate? Altruism as Exaptation and the Evolution of Human Sociality

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Developments in Primatology: Progress and Prospects ((DIPR,volume 36))

Abstract

In recent papers (e.g. Wilson and Wilson, 2007), it has been confirmed that the two standard solutions for the apparent paradox of the evolution of altruism and pro-social behaviours – ‘kin selection’, which leaves unsolved the question of population structure, and ‘group selection’ – can indeed be consistent with one other. The result is a possible explanation of the ambiguity between deeply entrenched attitudes to cooperation inside social groups and organized hostility among them (Bowles, 2008). Nevertheless, these models seem to undervalue the potential effects of ‘multilevel’ evolution and both notions remain strongly engaged with gene-centred interpretations of evolutionary dynamics – which lose their explanatory power when applied to group-living species that show unconditioned forms of altruism and pro-social feeling, especially when cultural evolution enters the process. In order to avoid ‘cultural discontinuity’ hypotheses at the other extreme, I emphasize the importance of ‘functional cooptation’, or ‘exaptation’ (Gould and Vrba, 1982; Gould, 2002) in arriving at a more satisfying explanation of the origins of free or reciprocal unselfishness, in group-living animals and in culture-bearing species.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    In the XIX century debate about the priority of the common ancestorship and the degree of relatedness between man and gorillas and between man and chimpanzees, Darwin – in this case against the opinion of T.H. Huxley – argued that chimpanzees, rather than gorillas, would have probably been closer to humans because of their more developed feelings of sympathy and love, the instincts of cooperation at the base of human sociality as well. See The Descent of Man, first part.

  2. 2.

    “If natural selection followed the classical models exclusively, species would not show any behaviour more positively social than the coming together of the sexes and the parental cares” (Hamilton, 1996, p. 31).

  3. 3.

    Inclusive fitness is not the sum of the direct individual fitness and the fitness of relatives (Grafen, 1982).

  4. 4.

    Edward O. Wilson dates his “paradigm shift” towards Hamilton’s approach at the spring of 1965 (Wilson, 1994, pp. 319–320).

  5. 5.

    Most of them, and Hamilton specifically, were nevertheless suspicious about the possibility that such ecological systems could really exist, maintaining a high degree (but not too high) of isolation, a low degree of migrations and flows of individuals between groups, high variability between groups, therefore strong systems of recognition and separation between egoists and altruists: features not necessarily adaptive and eventually an handicap for the range of choice of partners, degree of inbreeding, etc. So, the role of group selection remains hypothetical (Hamilton, 1996).

  6. 6.

    The explanatory role of the processes of exaptation is growing in recent literature of many evolutionary fields. Pre-adaptations and spandrels could be involved in the evolution of language according to Hauser, Chomsky and Fitch (2002), and more recently according to Lieberman (2006). Even some of the most important current faculties of the human brain, like reading, seem to be functional cooptations of evolutionarily older brain circuits, as in the interesting evolutionary reconstruction proposed by Stanislas Dehaene (2009).

  7. 7.

    Criticisms about the alleged irrelevant role of exaptation, or its reducibility to normal adaptation – advanced among others by Dawkins (1986) and Dennett (1995) – seem solved in Arnold (1994) and Gould (2002).

  8. 8.

    Williams and Williams (1957), from the point of view of an evolutionary biology of social behaviour based on the exclusive interest of Darwinian selfish individuals, proposed for this reason to use more neutral categories like “donors” and “non donors”.

References

  • Arnold, E.N. (1994) Investigating the origins of performance advantage: adaptation, exaptation and lineage effects. In Phylogenetics and Ecology (Eggleton P, Vane-Wright R, eds.). pp. 123–168. London, Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barrett, P.H., P.J. Gautrey, S. Herbert, D. Kohn, S. Smith (eds.). (1987) Charles Darwin’s Notebooks – 1836–1844, British Museum Natural History, Cornell University Press, Ithaca, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bekoff, M., J. Pierce (2009) Wild Justice. The Moral Lives of Animals, The University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowles, S. (2008) Conflict: Altruism’s midwife. Nature, 456, 326–327.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Boyd, R., P.J. Richerson (2005) Not by Genes Alone: How Culture Transformed Human Evolution, The University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brosnan, S.F., F.B.M. de Waal (2003) Monkeys reject unequal pay. Nature, 425, 297–299.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Buller, D.J. (2005) Adapting Minds. Evolutionary Psychology and the Persistent Quest for Human Nature, The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carr-Saunders, A.M. (1922) The Population Problem. A Study in Human Evolution, Clarendon Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cavalli-Sforza, L.L., M. Feldman (1981) Cultural Transmission and Evolution, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clutton-Brock, T. (2002) Breeding together: Kin Selection and mutualism in cooperative vertebrates. Science, 296, 69–72.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Darwin, C., (1836–1882) The Complete Work on line, University of Cambridge, UK http://www.darwinonline.edu

  • Dawkins, R. (1986) The Blind Watchmaker, Longman, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Caro, M., D. Macarthur (eds.). (2004) Naturalism in Question, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dehaene, S. (2009) Reading in the Brain. The Science and Evolution of a Human Invention, Penguin Viking, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dennett, D. (1995) Darwin Dangerous Idea, Simon and Schuster, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Waal, F.B.M. (1997) The chimpanzee’s service economy: Food for grooming. Evolution and Human Behavior, 18, 375–386.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Waal, F.B.M. (2006) Primates and Philosophers, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Waal, F.B.M. (2007) With a little help from a friend. PLoS Biology, 5(7), 190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Waal, F.B.M. (2008) Putting altruism back into altruism. Annual Review of Psychology, 59, 279–300.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dupré, J. (2001) Human Nature and the Limits of Science, Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Eldredge, N. (1985) Unfinished Synthesis. Biological Hierarchies and Modern Evolutionary Thought, Columbia University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eldredge, N. (1995) Reinventing Darwin, Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eldredge, N. (1999) The Pattern of Evolution, Freeman and C., New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eldredge, N., M. Grene (1992) Interactions. The Biological Context of Social Systems, Columbia University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, R.A. (1930) The Genetical Theory of Natural Selection, ed. 1958, Dover Publications, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gould S.J. (1980) The Panda’s Thumb, Norton and C., New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gould, S.J. (1993) Eight Little Piggies, Norton and C., New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gould, S.J. (2002) The Structure of Evolutionary Theory, Belknap-Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gould, S.J., E. Lloyd (1999) Individuality and adaptation across levels of selection. PNAS, 96, 11904–11909.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gould, S.J., E.S. Vrba (1982) Exaptation, a missing term in the science of form. Paleobiology, 8(1), 4–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gould, S.J., R.C. Lewontin (1979) The spandrels of San Marco and the Panglossian Paradigm. A critique of the adaptationist program. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, 205, 581–598.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Grafen, A. (1982) How not to measure inclusive fitness. Nature, 298, 425–426.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Haldane, J.B.S. (1932) The Causes of Evolution, ed. 1990, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haldane, J.B.S. (1955) Population genetics. New Biology, 18, 34–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton, W.D. (1963) The evolution of altruistic behaviour. The American Naturalist, 97, 354–356, now also in Hamilton, 1996.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton, W.D. (1964) The genetical evolution of social behaviour, Part I. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 7, 1–16.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton, W.D. (1970) Selfish and spiteful behaviour in an evolutionary model. Nature, 228, 1218–1220, now also in Hamilton, 1996.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton, W.D. (1996) Narrow Roads of Gene Land. Evolution of Social Behaviour, W.H. Freeman, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hart, D., R.W. Sussman (2009) Man the Hunted. Primates, Predators, and Human Evolution, expanded edition, Westview Press, Boulder, CO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hauser, M.D., N. Chomsky, W.T. Fitch (2002) The faculty of language: What is it, who has it, and how did it evolve? Science, 298, 1569–1579.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jacob, F. (1981) Les jeux des possibles, Seuil, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keller, L. (ed.) (1999) Levels of Selection in Evolution, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewontin, R.C. (1970) The units of selection. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 1, 1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewontin, R.C. (1998) Survival of the nicest? Review, ‘Unto Others’. The New York Review of Books, Oct. 22nd, pp. 59–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lieberman, P. (2006) Toward an Evolutionary Biology of Language, The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maynard Smith, J. (1964) Group selection and kin selection. Nature, 201, 1145–1146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maynard Smith, J. (1976) Group selection. Quarterly Review of Biology, 51, 277–283.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mayr, E. (1961) Cause and effect in biology. Science, 134, 1501–1506.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Odling-Smee, F.J., K.N. Laland, M.W. Feldman (2003) Niche Construction. The Neglected Process in Evolution, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Okasha, S. (2006) Evolution and the Levels of Selection, Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Pievani, T. (2003a) Rhapsodic evolution: Essay on exaptation and evolutionary pluralism. World Futures, 59(2), 63–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pievani, T. (2003b) The contingent subject. A radical theory of emergence in developmental processes. Journal of European Psychoanalysis, 17, 35–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pievani, T., E. Serrelli (2011) Exaptation in human evolution: how to test adaptive vs exaptive evolutionary hypotheses. Journal of Anthropological Sciences, June 2011, in press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pigliucci, M., G.B. Müller (2010) Evolution: the Extended Synthesis, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pigliucci, M., J. Kaplan (2006) Making Sense of Evolution, The University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, R.C. (2007) Evolutionary Psychology as Maladapted Psychology, The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seyfarth, R.M., D. Cheney (1984) Grooming, alliances and reciprocal altruism in vervet monkeys. Nature, 308, 541–443.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sober, E., D.S. Wilson (1998) Unto Others. The Evolution and Psychology of Unselfish Behaviour, Harvard University Press, Cambirdge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sterelny, K., P. Griffiths (1999) Sex and Death. An Introduction to Philosophy of Biology, The University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tattersall, I. (1998) Becoming Human: Evolution and Human Uniqueness, Harcourt Brace, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tattersall, I. (2002) The Monkey in the Mirror. Essays on the Science of What Makes Us Human, Harcourt, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tinbergen, N. (1963) On aims and methods of ethology. Zeitschrift fir Tierpsychologie, 20, 410–433.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vrba, E.S. (1983) Macroevolutionary trends: New perspectives on the roles of adaptation and incidental effect. Science, 221(22), 387–389.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Vrba, E.S., N. Eldredge (1984) Individuals, hierarchies and processes: Towards a more complete evolutionary theory. Paleobiology, 10, 146–171.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vrba, E.S., S.J. Gould (1986) The hierarchical expansion of sorting and selection: Sorting and selection cannot be equated. Paleobiology, 12(2), 217–228.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warneken, F., B. Hare, A.P. Melis, D. Hanus, M. Tomasello (2007) Spontaneous altruism by chimpanzees and young children. PLoS Biology, 5(7), 184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, G.C. (1966) Adaptation and Natural Selection, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, G.C., D.C. Williams (1957) A theory of group selection. PNAS, 72, 143–146.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, D.S., E. Sober (1994) Reintroducing group selection to the human behavioural science. Behavioural and Brain Sciences, 4(17), 585–654.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, D.S., E.O. Wilson (2007) Rethinking the theoretical foundation of sociobiology. Quarterly Review of Biology, 4(82), 327–348.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, E.O. (1975) Sociobiology. The New Synthesis, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, E.O. (1994) Naturalist, Island Press, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, S. (1945) Tempo and mode in evolution. A critical review. Ecology, 26, 415–419.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wynne-Edwards, V.C. (1963) Intergroup Selection in the evolution of social systems. Nature, 200, 623–626.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wynne-Edwards, V.C. (1986) Evolution through Group Selection, Blackwell Scientific, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Telmo Pievani .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Pievani, T. (2011). Born to Cooperate? Altruism as Exaptation and the Evolution of Human Sociality. In: Sussman, R., Cloninger, C. (eds) Origins of Altruism and Cooperation. Developments in Primatology: Progress and Prospects, vol 36. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-9520-9_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics