Abstract
Suppose your friend tells you that Mr. Hamburger is German or Swiss. You happen to know that Mr. Hamburger is not Swiss. Using your powers of reasoning, you decide that Mr. Hamburger is German. Note that this argument can be generalized, because it doesn’t really depend on Mr. Hamburger being Swiss or German. If your friend said that “A or B is true” and you happened to know that “B is not true,” you would conclude that “A is true.” This is an example of a valid argument. Now suppose your friend tells you that Mr. French eats only pickles on Wednesday, and only chocolate on Monday. You know that Mr. French is eating chocolate that day. Now what can you say? While you may conclude that Mr. French has odd eating habits, you would not have used a logically valid argument to do so. In this example, there is really only one thing you can conclude.We’ll return to this at the end of this chapter.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2011 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Daepp, U., Gorkin, P. (2011). Logically Speaking. In: Reading, Writing, and Proving. Undergraduate Texts in Mathematics. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-9479-0_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-9479-0_2
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4419-9478-3
Online ISBN: 978-1-4419-9479-0
eBook Packages: Mathematics and StatisticsMathematics and Statistics (R0)