Abstract
Spatial data infrastructures (SDI), with technological and conceptual roots stretching back multiple decades, are moving into a new era through the development of spatial cyberinfrastructures (spatial CI) that account for geospatial semantics. While the technology and concepts share many similarities, spatial cyberinfrastructures distinctly focus on the provision of information to support scientific knowledge sharing. These cyberinfrastructures are increasingly connected into an ecology of scientific knowledge sharing based on the formalization of geospatial semantics and support for shared knowledge and collective intelligence. We trace the development of cyberinfrastructures from spatial data infrastructures as the potential framework for geospatial semantical interoperability. The chapter also points to substantial semantic research challenges and the potential of spatial cyberinfrastructures.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Bamberger, W.J., Sharing geographic information among local government agencies in the San Diego region, in Sharing Geographic Information, H. Onsrud and G. Rushton, Editors. 1995, Center for Urban Policy Research: New Brunswick, NJ. p. 119–137.
Burmanje, D. (2005) Spatial Data Infrastructures and Land Administration in Europe.
Crompvoets, J., National Spatial Data Clearinghouses. 2006, Wageningen, The Netherlands: Wageningen University.
de Man, W.H.E., Understanding SDI: Complexity and institionalization. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 2006. 20(3): p. 329–343.
Georgiadou, Y. and J. Stoter, SDI for public governance–implications for evaluation research, in A Multi-View Framework to Assess Spatial Data Infrastructures, J. Crompvoets, et al., Editors. 2009, Space for Geo-Information (RGI): Wageningen. p. 51–68.
Johnson, R., Z. Nedovic-Budic, and K. Covert, Lessons from Practice. A Guidebook to Organizing and Sustaining Geodata Collaboratives. 2001, GeoData Alliance: Reston, VA.
Masser, I. and M. Wegener, Brave new GIS worlds, in GIS Diffusion: The Adoption and Use of Geographical Information Systems in Local Government in Europe, H. Masser, H. Campbell, and M. Craglia, Editors. 1996, Taylor & Francis: London.
Nedovic-Budic, Z., J.K. Pinto, and L. Warnecke, GIS database development and exchange: interaction mechanisms and motivations. URISA Journal, 2004. 16(1): p. 16–29.
Obermeyer, N., Reducing inter-organizational conflict to facilitate sharing geographic information, in Sharing Geographic Information, H. Onsrud and G. Rushton, Editors. 1995, Center for Urban Policy Research: New Brunswick, NJ. p. 138–148.
Rajabifard, A., et al., The role of sub-national government and the private sector in future spatial data infrastructures. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 2006. 20(7): p. 727–742.
Tulloch, D.L. and F. Harvey, When Data Sharing Becomes Institutionalized: Best Practices in Local Government Geographic Information Relationships. URISA Journal, 2008. 19(2): p. 51–59.
Gahegan, M., et al., Connecting GEON: Making sense of the myriad resources, researchers and concepts that comprise a geoscience cyberinfrastructure. Computers and Geosciences, 2009. 35(4): p. 836–854.
Ribes, D. and G.C. Bowker, Between meaning and machine: Learning to represent the knowledge of communities Information and Organization, 2009. 19(4).
Burrough, P.A., Principles of Geographical Information Systems for Land Resource Assessment. 1987, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Chrisman, N.R. Challenges for Research in Geographic Information Systems. in International Geographic Information Systems Symposium. 1987. Arlington, VA: NASA.
Dobson, J., Automated Geography. The Professional Geographer, 1983. 35(2): p. 135–143.
Robinove, C., Principles of Logic and the Use of Digital Geographic Information Systems. 1986, U.S. Geological Survey: Washington D.C.
Tomlinson, R.F. Geographic Information Systems - A new frontier. in International Symposium on Spatial Data Handling. 1984. Zurich.
Abler, R.F., Everything in its Place: GPS, GIS, and Geography in the 1990s. Professional Geographer, 1993. 45(2): p. 131–139.
Armstrong, M., On automated geography! The Professional Geographer, 1993. 45(4): p. 440–442.
Bonham-Carter, G.F., Geographic Information Systems for Geoscientists. Modelling with GIS. Computer Methods in the Geosciences. Vol. 13. 1994, Tarrytown: Pergamon.
Craig, W.J., Why we can’t share data: Institutional Inertia, in Sharing Geographic Information, H.J. Onsrud and G. Rushton, Editors. 1995, Center for Urban Policy Research: New Brunswick, NJ. p. 107–118.
Desham, P., M.P. Armstrong, and K.K. Kemp, Collaborative Spatial Decision Making. 1995, NCGIA: Santa Barbara, CA.
Elwood, S. and H. Leitner, GIS and community-based planning: Exploring the diversity of neighborhood perspectives and needs. Cartography and Geographic Information Systems, 1998. 25(2): p. 77–88.
Goodchild, M. Cartographic futures on a digital earth. in International Cartographic Congress. 1999. Ottawa, Canada: ICA,.
Reeve, D. and J. Petch, GIS, Organisations, and People. A Socio-technical Approach. GIS for beginners, ed. D. Reeve and J. Petch. 1999, London: Taylor and Francis. 214.
Yapa, L., Why GIS needs postmodern social theory, and vice versa, in Policy Issues in Modern Cartography, D.F.R. Taylor, Editor. 1998, Elsevier Science: London. p. xx.
Georgiadou, Y., S.K. Puri, and S. Sahay, Towards a potential research agenda to guide the implementation of Spatial Data Infrastructures—A case study from India. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 2005. 19(10): p. 1113–1130.
Puri, S.K., Technological Frames of Stakeholders Shaping the SDI Implementation: A Case Study from India Information Technology for Development, 2006. 12(4): p. 311–331.
Crompvoets, J., et al., eds. A Multi-View Framework to Assess Spatial Data Infrastructures. 2009, Space for Geo-Information (RGI): Wageningen.
Mukherjee, F. and R. Ghose, Complexities in GIS construction and spatial knowledge production in Dane county, Wisconsin. Cartography and Geographic Informaiton Science, 2009. 36(4): p. 299–314.
Masser, I., GIS Worlds: Creating Spatial Data Infrastructures. 2005, Redlands, CA: ESRI Press.
Onsrud, H., Research and theory in advancing spatial data infastructure concepts. 2007, Redlands, CA: ESRI Press.
Parastatidis, S., E. Viegas, and T. Hey, A “Smart” Cyberinfrastructure for Research. Communications of the ACM, 2009. 52(21): p. 33–37.
Brodaric, B., Geo-pragmatics for the geospatial semantic web. Transactions inf GIS, 2007. 11(3): p. 453–477.
Fonseca, F. and A. Rogriquez, From geo-pragmatics to derivation ontologies: New directions for the geospatial semantic web. Transactions in GIS, 2007. 11(3): p. 313–316.
Wolniewicz, P., Easily-accessible digital palaeontological databases – a new perspective for the storage of palaeontological information. Geologos, 2009. 15(3–4): p. 181–188.
Lutz, M. and D. Kolas, Rule-based discovery in spatial data infrastructure. Transactions in GIS, 2007. 11(3): p. 317–336.
Lutz, M., Ontology-based descriptions for semantic discovery and composition of geoprocessing services. Geoinformatica, 2007. 11: p. 1–36.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2011 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Harvey, F., Raskin, R.G. (2011). Spatial Cyberinfrastructure: Building New Pathways for Geospatial Semantics on Existing Infrastructures. In: Ashish, N., Sheth, A. (eds) Geospatial Semantics and the Semantic Web. Semantic Web and Beyond, vol 12. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-9446-2_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-9446-2_4
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-1-4419-9445-5
Online ISBN: 978-1-4419-9446-2
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)