Skip to main content

Patient Navigation and Coordination of Care for the Oncofertility Patient: A Practical Guide

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Oncofertility Medical Practice

Abstract

Providing care to reproductive-age cancer patients who wish to pursue fertility preservation prior to initiating cancer treatment—the oncofertility patient—requires the collaborative efforts of oncologists, reproductive endocrinologists, nurses, and counselors, and all within a very short time frame. Both clinician and patient education about the potential gonadotoxicity of cancer therapies and the available options for fertility preservation are essential to improve patient access to these procedures. In the hospital setting, an oncofertility patient navigator can help guide patients across institutional and disciplinary boundaries to assess their cancer treatment and infertility risk, seek consultation with reproductive endocrinologists, and discuss treatment options and costs. Electronic medical records can assist in identifying reproductive-age patients who are scheduled for gonadotoxic therapy or who are interested in fertility preservation, so that they can be referred in a timely manner. Reproductive endocrinology practices that accept oncofertility patients must be prepared to provide care on short notice, including access to sperm donors, mental health professionals, and legal counsel. Oncofertility nurse coordinators are essential to ensuring that cancer patients undergo hormonal stimulation for oocyte or embryo cryopreservation efficiently and that their cancer treatment is not unnecessarily delayed by fertility preservation procedures. Unifying each of these steps ensures that decisions can be made in a timely manner and that the patient is given the best information about reproductive options, which may minimize later regret.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Lee S, et al. Determinants of access to fertility preservation in women with breast cancer. Fertil Steril. 2011;95:1932–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Quinn GP, et al. Physician referral for fertility preservation in oncology patients: a national study of practice behaviors. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27:5952–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Kohler TS, et al. Results from the survey for preservation of adolescent reproduction (SPARE) study: gender disparity in delivery of fertility preservation message to adolescents with cancer. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2011;28:269–77.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Vadaparampil S, et al. Barriers to fertility preservation among pediatric oncologists. Patient Educ Couns. 2008;72:402–10.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Quinn GP, et al. Impact of physicians’ personal discomfort and patient prognosis on discussion of fertility preservation with young cancer patients. Patient Educ Couns. 2009;77:338–43.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. King L, et al. Oncology social workers’ perceptions of barriers to discussing fertility preservation with cancer patients. Soc Work Health Care. 2008;47:479–501.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Lee S, et al. Value of early referral to fertility preservation in women with breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2010;28:4683–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Nagel K, et al. Collaborative multidisciplinary team approach to fertility issues among adolescent and young adult cancer patients. Int J Nurs Pract. 2009;15:311–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Gardino SL, Emanuel LL. Choosing life when facing death: understanding fertility preservation decision-making for cancer patients. Cancer Treat Res. 2010;156:447–58.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Chambers GM, et al. The economic impact of assisted reproductive technology: a review of selected developed countries. Fertil Steril. 2009;91:2281–94.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Basco D, Campo-Engelstien L, Rodriguez S. Insuring against infertility: expanding state infertility mandates to include fertility preservation technology for cancer patients. J Law Med Ethics. 2010;38:832–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Quinn GP, et al. Oncologists’ use of patient educational materials about cancer and fertility preservation. Psychooncology. 2011. doi:10.1002/pon.2022.

  13. Woodruff TK. The Oncofertility Consortium–addressing fertility in young people with cancer. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2010;7:466–75.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Oncology Nursing Society, Association of Oncology Social Work, National Association of Social Workers. Oncology Nursing Society, the Association of Oncology Social Work, and the National Association of Social Workers joint position on the role of oncology nursing and oncology social work in patient navigation. Oncol Nurs Forum. 2010;37:251–2.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Browne H, et al. Ethical and psychological considerations in fertility preservation counseling. Cancer J. 2008;14:340–2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Gardino SL, Jeruss JS, Woodruff TK. Using decision trees to enhance interdisciplinary team work: the case of oncofertility. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2010;27:227–31.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Jona K, Gerber A. MyOncofertility.org: a web-based patient education resource supporting decision making under severe emotional and cognitive overload. Cancer Treat Res. 2010;156:345–61.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Langley LS, Blackston JW. Sperm, egg, and a petri dish. Unveiling the underlying property issues surrounding cryopreserved embryos. J Leg Med. 2006;27:167–206.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Lyerly AD, Nakagawa S, Kuppermann M. Decisional conflict and the disposition of frozen embryos: implications for informed consent. Hum Reprod. 2011;26:646–54.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Dolin G, et al. Medical hope, legal pitfalls: potential legal issues in the emerging field of oncofertility. Cancer Treat Res. 2010;156:111–34.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Reh AE, et al. Treatment outcomes and quality-of-life assessment in a university-based fertility preservation program: results of a registry of female cancer patients at 2 years. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2011;28:635–41.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the Oncofertility Consortium NIH/NICHD 5UL1DE019587.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Clarisa Gracia M.D., M.S.C.E. .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Smith, K., Efymow, B., Gracia, C. (2012). Patient Navigation and Coordination of Care for the Oncofertility Patient: A Practical Guide. In: Gracia, C., Woodruff, T. (eds) Oncofertility Medical Practice. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-9425-7_13

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-9425-7_13

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4419-9424-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4419-9425-7

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics