Skip to main content

Collective Intelligence and Multilevel Selection

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Development and Causality
  • 1783 Accesses

Abstract

Multilevel selection concerns the evolutionary influence of group relative to individual adaptive pressures. It is being applied increasingly to human behavior, from development to economic dynamics. In the present chapter, I expand multilevel selection to five levels – (a) natural selection or individual fitness, (b) kin selection, (c) Group-for-Individual selection, (d) reciprocal altruism or selection, and (e) group (Individual-for-Group) selection. I speculate that the five levels of multilevel selection could have worked in concert to have helped evolve the five proposed Neo-Piagetian stages in human cognitive development – (a) reflexive, (b) sensorimotor, (c) perioperational (representational; preoperational and concrete operational), (d) abstract (formal), and (e) collective intelligence (postformal). The latter adult stage includes cognitive activities such as brainstorming at work, illustrating the adaptive advantages of behavioral products of group selection processes in human evolution.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Dawkins, R. (1976). The selfish gene. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawkins, R. (1982). The extended phenotype: The gene as the unit of selection. San Francisco: Freeman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flinn, M., & Alexander, R. (2007). Runaway social selection in human evolution. In S. W. Gangstad & J. A. Simpson (Eds.), The evolution of mind: Fundamental questions and controversies (pp. 249–255). New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldstone, R. L., Roberts, M. E., & Gureckis, T. M. (2008). Emergent processes in group behavior. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 17, 10–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton, W. D. (1964). The genetical evolution of social behavior I and II. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 7, 1–52.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jablonka, E., & Lamb, M. J. (2005). Evolution in four dimensions: Genetic, epigenetic, behavioral, and symbolic variation in the history of life. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kauffman, S. (1993). The origins of order: Self-organization and selection in evolution. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kurzban, R., & Aktipis, C. A. (2007). On detecting the footprints of multilevel selection in humans. In S. W. Gangstad & J. A. Simpson (Eds.), The evolution of mind: Fundamental questions and controversies (pp. 226–232). New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Labouvie-Vief, G. (1992). A neo-Piagetian perspective on adult cognitive development. In R. J. Sternberg & C. A. Berg (Eds.), Intellectual development (pp. 197–228). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Landa, J. T. (2008). The bioeconomics of homogenous middleman groups as adaptive units. Journal of Bioeconomics, 10, 259–278.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Landa, J. T. (2009). Homogenous middleman groups as superorganisms, endogenous ethnic groups, and trust networks: Reply to comments on Janet Landa’s target article, ‘The bioeconomics of homogenous middleman groups as adaptive units’. Journal of Bioeconomics, 10, 259–278.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mesoudi, A. (2009). How cultural evolutionary theory can inform social psychology and vice versa. Psychological Review, 116, 929–952.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nowak, M. A. (2006). Five rules for the evolution of cooperation. Science, 314, 1560–1563.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nowak, M. A., Tarnita, C. E., & Wilson, E. O. (2010). The evolution of eusociality. Nature, 466, 1057–1062.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Okasha, S. (2006). Evolution and the levels of selection. Oxford: Clarendon.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Richards, F. A., & Commons, M. L. (1990). Postformal cognitive-developmental theory and research: A review of its current status. In C. N. Alexander & E. J. Langer (Eds.), Higher stages of human development: Perspectives on adult growth (pp. 139–160). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richerson, P. J., & Boyd, R. (2005). Not by genes alone: How culture transformed human evolution. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stewart, J. E. (1995). Metaevolution. Journal of Social and Evolutionary Systems, 18, 113–147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tomasello, M. (2009). Why we cooperate. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trivers, R. L. (1971). The evolution of reciprocal altruism. Quarterly Review of Biology, 46, 35–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van den Bergh, J. C. J. M., & Gowdy, J. M. (2009). A group selection perspective on economic behavior, institutions, and organizations. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 72, 1–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weber, B. H., & Depew, D. J. (2003). Evolution and learning: The Baldwin effect reconsidered. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, D. S. (2009). Convergent cultural evolution and multilevel selection: Reply to comments on Janet Landa’s ‘The bioeconomics of homogenous middleman groups as adaptive units: Theory and empirical evidence viewed from a group selection framework’. Journal of Bioeconomics, 11, 185–190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, D. S., Van Vugt, M., & O’Gorman, R. (2008). Multilevel selection theory and major evolutionary transitions: Implications for psychological science. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 17, 6–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, D. S., & Wilson, E. O. (2007). Rethinking the theoretical foundation of sociobiology. The Quarterly Review of Biology, 82, 327–348.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Young, G. (1990a). Early neuropsychological development: Lateralization of functions - hemispheric specialization. In C. A. Hauert (Ed.), Developmental psychology: Cognitive, perceptuo-motor and neuropsychological perspectives (pp. 113–181). Amsterdam: North Holland.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Young, G. (1990b). The development of hemispheric and manual specialization. In G. E. Hammond (Ed.), Cerebral control of speech and limb movements (pp. 79–139)). Amsterdam: North Holland.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Young, G. (1997). Adult development, therapy, and culture: A postmodern synthesis. New York: Plenum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, G. (2008). Causality and causation in law, medicine, psychiatry, and psychology: Progression or regression? Psychological Injury and Law, 1, 161–181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gerald Young .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Young, G. (2011). Collective Intelligence and Multilevel Selection. In: Development and Causality. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-9422-6_32

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics