Skip to main content

Criticism to “The Limits to Growth”

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Limits to Growth Revisited

Part of the book series: SpringerBriefs in Energy ((ENERGYANALYS))

Abstract

Thomas Huxley (who liked to be defined “Darwin’s bulldog”) said that “It is the customary fate of new truths to begin as heresies and to end as superstitions.” There are many cases in which excessive conservatism in science has prevented new ideas (“heresies”) from being adopted and has kept old ideas (“superstitions”) alive for too long. Conservatism, however, is not a negative feature of science. It is useful, actually essential, in order to maintain intact the core methods of science and eliminate misplaced enthusiasm not based on sufficient evidence. The problem is: what is a genuine innovation and what a fad that will soon disappear?

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    1  Physicists may not agree on this point. Perhaps, Sterman’s statement should be modified as “all non linear models are wrong.”

References

  • Bailey, Ronald 1989, “Dr. Doom” Forbes, Oct 16, p. 45

    Google Scholar 

  • Bardi, Ugo; Lavacchi, Alessandro. 2009. "A Simple Interpretation of Hubbert’s Model of Resource Exploitation." Energies 2, no. 3: 646–661.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bongaarts, J.P. (1973), “A review of the population sector in The Limits to Growth”, Studies in Family Planning. Vol 4, No. 12, pp 327–334

    Google Scholar 

  • Cole H.S.D., Freeman C., Jahoda M., Pavitt K.L.R., 1973, “Models of Doom” Universe Books, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • R. G. Coyle, The technical elements of the system dynamics approach, European Journal of Operational Research, Volume 14, Issue 4, December 1983, Pages 359–370, ISSN 0377–2217, DOI: 10.1016/0377-2217(83)90236-9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forrester, J. W. 1971 World Dynamics. Wright-Allen, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forrester, J. W., Low G. W., Mass N. J., 1974 “The Debate on World Dynamics: A Response to Nordhaus”, Policy Sciences 5, 169–190

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Franses, P. H., 2002 “A concise Introduction to Econometrics”, Cambridge University Press, London.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Koehler, J.E, 1973, The Journal of Politics, 35 p 513–514

    Google Scholar 

  • Meadows, Donella H., Dennis L. Meadows, Jorgen Randers, and William W. Behrens III. 1972. “The Limits to Growth”. New York: Potomac.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meadows, Donella H; Meadows, Dennis L; and Randers, Jorgen (1992) Beyond the Limits, Chelsea Green, Post Mills, VT

    Google Scholar 

  • Mikesell, R.F., (1995) “The Limits to Growth, a reappraisal” Resources Policy, Volume 21, Issue 2, June 1995, Pages 127–131

    Google Scholar 

  • Myrtveit, Magne, 2005 “Working papers in System dynamics” -http://www.ifi.uib.no/sd/workingpapers/WPSD1.05WorldControversy.pdf (accessed July 20, 2010)

  • Nordhaus W., 1973 “Word Dynamics: Measurements without Data”, The Economic Journal n. 332.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nordhaus W. D., 1992a, “Lethal Models” Brookings Papers on Economic Activity 2, 1

    Google Scholar 

  • Nordhaus W. D., 1992b “An optimal transition path for controlling greenhouse gases” Science, 258(20 November) 1315–1319

    Google Scholar 

  • Simmons, M., 2000, “Revisiting The Limits to Growth: Could The Club of Rome Have Been Correct, After All?” http://www.simmonsco-intl.com/files/172.pdf

  • Sterman J. D., 2002, “All models are wrong: reflections on becoming a system scientist”, System Dynamics Review, Vol 18, No. 4, pp. 501–531

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stiglitz, J.E. (1974a). Growth with Exhaustible Natural Resources: Efficient and Optimal Growth Paths. Review of Economic Studies, Symposium on the Economics of Exhaustible Resources, 123–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stiglitz, J.E. (1974b). Growth with Exhaustible Natural Resources: The Competitive Economy. Review of Economic Studies, Symposium on the Economics of Exhaustible Resources, 138–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Townsend, Robert L. (1970). Up the Organization; How to Stop the Corporation from Stifling People and Strangling. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ugo Bardi .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Ugo Bardi

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Bardi, U. (2011). Criticism to “The Limits to Growth”. In: The Limits to Growth Revisited. SpringerBriefs in Energy(). Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-9416-5_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics