Understanding Underemployment Among Contingent Workers

  • Catherine E. Connelly
  • Christa L. Wilkin
  • Daniel G. Gallagher
Chapter

Abstract

Contingent workers, who do not have ongoing employment with a single organization, are an increasingly important component of the workforce in many countries (e.g., Batt, Holman, & Holtgrewe, 2009; De Cuyper et al., 2008; Mauno, Kinnunen, Mäkikangas, & Nätti, 2005). The proportion of workers with contingent work arrangements, alternatively known as fixed-term contracts, precarious work arrangements, or nonstandard employment contracts, are likely to increase, because these types of contracts present several advantages to employers.

Keywords

Contingent work Direct-hire temporary workers Temporary agency workers Independent contractors 

References

  1. Adams, J. S. (1965). Inequity in social exchange. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (pp. 267–299). New York: Academic.Google Scholar
  2. Ang, S., & Slaughter, S. A. (2001). Work outcomes and job design for contract versus permanent information systems professionals on software development teams. MIS Quarterly, 25, 321–350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ashford, S. J., George, E., & Blatt, R. (2007). Old assumptions, new work: The opportunities and challenges of research on nonstandard employment. The Academy of Management Annals, 1(1), 65–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Barling, J., & Gallagher, D. G. (1996). Part-time employment. In C. Cooper & I. Robertson (Eds.), International review of industrial & organizational psychology (Vol. 11, pp. 243–277). New York: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
  5. Barney, J. B. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17, 99–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Batt, R., Holman, D., & Holtgrewe, U. (2009). The globalization of service work: Comparative institutional perspectives on call centers. Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 62, 453–488.Google Scholar
  7. Beltrán-Martín, I., Roca-Puig, V., Escrig-Tena, A., & Bou-Llusar, J. C. (2008). Human resource flexibility as a mediating variable between high performance work systems and performance. Journal of Management, 34, 1009–1044.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bendapudi, V., Mangum, S. L., & Tansky, J. W. (2003). Nonstandard employment arrangements: A proposed typology and policy planning framework. Human Resource Planning, 26, 24–40.Google Scholar
  9. Bergman, M. E. (2002). Psychological and objective contingency as predictors of work attitudes and behavior. Paper presentation at the Academy of Management Meeting, Denver, CO, August 2002.Google Scholar
  10. Bernasek, A., & Kinnear, D. (1999). Worker’s willingness to accept contingent employment. Journal of Economic Issues, 33, 461–469.Google Scholar
  11. Blau, G. J. (1964). Exchange and power in social life. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  12. Blau, G. J. (1968). Social exchange. In D. Sills (Ed.), International encyclopedia of the social sciences (pp. 452–458). New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  13. Boyce, A. S., Ryan, A. M., Imus, A. L., & Morgeson, F. P. (2007). Temporary worker, permanent loser? A model of the stigmatization of temporary workers. Journal of Management, 33, 5–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Brown, J. D., Gimpelson, V., Lehmann, H., Vantu, I., Voicu, A., Earle, J., et al. (2006). Nonstandard forms and measures of employment and unemployment in transition: A comparative study of Estonia, Romania, and Russia (Discussion Paper No. 1961). Germany: The Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA).Google Scholar
  15. Church, P. H., & Lambert, K. R. (1993). Employee or independent contractor? Management Accounting, 74, 52–55.Google Scholar
  16. Cohany, S. R. (1998). Workers in alternative employment arrangements: A second look. Monthly Labor Review, 121(11), 3–21.Google Scholar
  17. Collinson, D. L. (1999). ‘Surviving the rigs’: Safety and surveillance on north sea oil installations. Organization Studies, 20, 579–600.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Connelly, C. E., & Gallagher, D. G. (2004). Emerging trends in contingent work research. Journal of Management, 30, 959–983.Google Scholar
  19. Connelly, C. E., Gallagher, D. G., & Gilley, K. M. (2007). Organizational commitment among contracted employees: A replication and extension with temporary workers. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 70, 326–335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Coyle-Shapiro, J. A.-M., & Morrow, P. C. (2006). Organizational and client commitment among contracted employees. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 68, 416–431.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Cross, R., & Cummings, J. N. (2004). Tie and network correlates of individual performance in knowledge-intensive work. The Academy of Management Journal, 47, 928–937.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. De Cuyper, N., de Jong, J., De Witte, H., Isaksson, K., Rigotti, T., & Schalk, R. (2008). Literature review of theory and research on the psychological impact of temporary employment: Towards a conceptual model. International Journal of Management Reviews, 10, 25–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. De Cuyper, N., Isaksson, K., & De Witte, H. (Eds.). (2005). Employment contracts and well-being among European workers. Aldershot, UK: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  24. Dennis, W. J. (2006). Self-employment: When nothing else is available?. Journal of Labor Research, 17, 645–661.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. De Witte, H., & Näswall, K. (2003). “Objective” vs. “subjective” jobs insecurity: Consequences of temporary work for job satisfaction and organizational commitment in four European countries. Economic and Industrial Democracy, 24, 149–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Ellingson, J. E., Gruys, M. L., & Sackett, P. R. (1998). Factors related to the satisfaction and performance of temporary employees. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83, 913–921.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Evans, J. A., Kunda, G., & Barley, S. R. (2004). Beach time, Bridge time, and billable hours: The temporal structure of technical contracting. Administrative Science Quarterly, 49, 1–38.Google Scholar
  28. Feldman, D. C. (1996). The nature, antecedents and consequences of underemployment. Journal of Management, 22, 385–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Feldman, D. C. (2006). Toward a new taxonomy for understanding the nature and consequences of contingent employment. Career Development International, 11, 28–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Feldman, D. C., Doerpinghaus, H. I., & Turnley, W. H. (1994). Managing temporary workers: A permanent HRM challenge. Organizational Dynamics, 13, 49–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Feldman, D. C., Leana, C. R., & Bolino, M. C. (2002). Underemployment and relative deprivation among re-employed executives. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 75, 453–471.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Festinger, L. (1954). A theory of social comparison processes. Human Relations, 7(2), 117–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Forde, C. (2001). Temporary arrangements: The activities of employment agencies in the UK. Work, Employment and Society, 15(3), 631–644.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Fragoso, J. L., & Kleiner, B. H. (2005). How to distinguish between independent contractors and employees. Management Research News, 28, 136–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Gallagher, D. G. (2002). Contingent work contracts: Practice and theory. In C. L. Cooper & R. J. Burke (Eds.), The new world of work (pp. 115–136). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  36. Gallagher, D. G., & McLean Parks, J. (2001). I pledge thee my troth… contingently: Commitment and the contingent work relationship. Human Resource Management Review, 11, 181–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Gebel, M. (2009). Fixed-term contracts at labour market entry in West Germany: Implications for job search and first job quality. European Sociological Review, 25(6), 661–675.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Gephart, R. P., Jr. (2002). Introduction to the brave new workplace: Organizational behavior in the electronic age. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 23, 327–344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Hardy, D. J., & Walker, R. J. (2003). Temporary but seeking permanence: A study of New Zealand temps. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 24(3), 141–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Hipple, S., & Stewart, J. (1996). Earnings and benefits of workers in alternative work arrangements. Monthly Labor Review, 119, 46–54.Google Scholar
  41. Hitt, M. A., Bierman, L., Shimizu, K., & Kochhar, R. (2001). Direct and moderating effects of human capital on strategy and performance in professional service firms: A resource based perspective. Academy of Management Journal, 44, 13–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Ho, V. T., Ang, S., & Straub, D. (2003). When subordinates become IT contractors: Persistent managerial expectations in IT outsourcing. Information Systems Research, 14, 66–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Homans, G. C. (1961). Social behavior: Its elementary forms. London, UK: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
  44. Houseman, S. N. (2001). Why employers use flexible staffing arrangements: Evidence from an establishment survey. Industrial and Labor Relations Review , 55, 149–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Isaksson, K., & Bellagh, K. (2002). Health problems and quitting among female “temps”. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 11, 27–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Kalleberg, A. L. (2000). Nonstandard employment relations: Part-time, temporary and contract work. Annual Review of Sociology, 26, 341–365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Kalleberg, A. L. (2008). The mismatched worker: When people don’t fit their jobs. Academy of Management Perspectives, 22(1), 24–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Kalleberg, A. L., Reskin, B. F., & Hudson, K. (2000). Bad jobs in America: Standard and nonstandard employment relations and job quality in the United States. American Sociological Review, 65(2), 256–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Krausz, M., Brandwein, T., & Fox, S. (1995). Work attitudes and emotional responses of permanent, voluntary, and involuntary temporary-help employees: An exploratory study. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 44, 217–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Krausz, M., Sagie, A., & Bidermann, Y. (2000). Actual and preferred work schedules and scheduling control as determinants of job-related attitudes. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 56(1), 1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Lautsch, B. A. (2002). Uncovering and explaining variance in the features and outcomes of contingent work. Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 56, 23–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Lautsch, B. A. (2003). The influence of regular work systems on compensation for contingent workers. Industrial Relations, 42(4), 565–588.Google Scholar
  53. Lepak, D. P., Takeuchi, R., & Snell, S. A. (2003). Employment flexibility and firm performance: Examining the interaction effects of employment mode, environmental dynamism, and technology intensity. Journal of Management , 29, 681–703.Google Scholar
  54. Loutfi, M. F. (2001). Women, gender, and work. What is equality and how do we get there? Geneva, CH: International Labour Organization.Google Scholar
  55. Marler, J. H., Barringer, M. W., & Milkovich, G. T. (2002). Boundaryless and traditional contingent employees: Worlds apart. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 23, 425–452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Masterson, S. S., Lewis, K., Goldman, B. M., & Taylor, M. S. (2000). Integrating justice and social exchange: The differing effects of fair procedures and treatment on work relationships. Academy of Management Journal, 43, 738–748.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Matusik, S. F., & Hill, C. W. (1998). The utilization of contingent work, knowledge creation, and competitive advantage. Academy of Management Review, 23, 690–697.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Mauno, S., Kinnunen, U., Mäkikangas, A., & Nätti, J. (2005). Psychological consequences of fixed-term employment and perceived job insecurity among health care staff. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 14, 209–237.Google Scholar
  59. Maynard, D. C., Joseph, T. A., & Maynard, A. M. (2006). Underemployment, job attitudes, and turnover intentions. Journal of Organizational Behaviour, 27(4), 509–536.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Morrow, P. C., McElroy, J. C., & Elliott, S. M. (1994). The effect of preference for work status, schedule, and shift on work-related attitudes. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 45(2), 202–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Nollen, S. D., & Axel, H. (1996). Managing contingent workers. New York: American Management Association.Google Scholar
  62. Orr, J. E. (1996). Talking about Machines. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  63. Pearce, J. L. (1993). Volunteers: The organizational behavior of unpaid workers. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  64. Pink, D. H. (2001). Free agent nation. New York: Time Warner.Google Scholar
  65. Polivka, A. E. (1996). Into contingent and alternative employment: By choice? Monthly Labor Review, 119(10), 55–74.Google Scholar
  66. Reagans, R., & McEvily, B. (2003). Network structure and knowledge transfer: The effects of cohesion and range. Administrative Science Quarterly, 48(2), 240–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Reilly, P. A. (1998). Balancing flexibility, meeting the interests of employer and employee. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 7, 7–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Segal, L. M., & Sullivan, D. G. (1997). The growth of temporary services work. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 11(2), 117–136.Google Scholar
  69. Sias, P. M., Kramer, M. W., & Jenkins, E. (1997). A comparison of the communication behaviors of temporary employees and new hires. Communication Research, 24, 731–754.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Silla, I., Gracia, F. J., & Peiró, J. M. (2005). Job insecurity and health-related outcomes among different types of temporary workers. Economic and Industrial Democracy, 26, 89–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Standing, G. (2009). Work and occupation in a tertiary society. Labour and Industry, 19, 49–72.Google Scholar
  72. Stanworth, C., & Druker, J. (2006). Human resource solutions? Dimensions of employers’ use of temporary agency labour in the UK. Personnel Review, 35, 175–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In W. G. Austin & S. Worchel (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 33–47). London: Academic.Google Scholar
  74. Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. (1986). The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. In S. Worchel & W. G. Austin (Eds.), Psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 7–24). Chicago: Nelson-Hall.Google Scholar
  75. Tan, H., & Tan, C. (2002). Temporary employees in Singapore: What drives them?. The Journal of Psychology, 136(1), 83–102.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Theisen, B. A., & Pelfrey, S. (1993). The advantages and risks of being a tax-exempt, nonprofit organization. Journal of Nursing Administration, 23(2), 36–41.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Tipps, H. C., & Gordon, H. A. (1985). Inequality at work: Race, sex, and underemployment. Social Indicators Research, 16, 35–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Uzzi, B., & Barsness, Z. I. (1998). Contingent employment in British establishments: Organizational determinants of the use of fixed-term hires and part-time workers. Social Forces, 76, 967–1007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Van Arsdale, D., & Mandarino, M. (2009). The proliferation and consequences of temporary help work: A cross-border comparison. Just Labour: A Canadian Journal of Work and Society, 14, 1–12.Google Scholar
  80. Van Breugel, G., Van Olffen, W., & Olie, R. (2005). Temporary liaisons: The commitment of ‘temps’ towards their agencies. Journal of Management Studies, 42, 539–566.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Virtanen, M., Kivimäki, M., Virtanen, P., Elovainio, M., & Vahtera, J. (2003). Disparity in occupational training and career planning between contingent and permanent employees. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 12, 19–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Wang, S., & Noe, R. A. (2010). Knowledge sharing: A review and directions for future research. Human Resource Management Review, 20(2), 115–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Wasko, M. M., & Faraj, S. (2005). Why should I share? Examining social capital and knowledge contribution in electronic networks of practice. MIS Quarterly, 29, 35–57.Google Scholar
  84. Webster, J., Brown, G., Zweig, D., Connelly, C. E., Brodt, S., & Sitkin, S. (2008). Beyond knowledge sharing: Withholding knowledge at work. In J. Martocchio (Ed.), Research in personnel and human resources management (Vol. 27, pp. 1–37). United Kingdom: Emerald Group.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Catherine E. Connelly
    • 1
  • Christa L. Wilkin
    • 2
  • Daniel G. Gallagher
    • 3
  1. 1.DeGroote School of BusinessMcMaster UniversityHamiltonCanada
  2. 2.Organizational Behaviour and Human Resource ManagementMcMaster UniversityHamiltonCanada
  3. 3.James Madison UniversityHarrisonburgUSA

Personalised recommendations