Abstract
The last century has seen the ascendancy, indeed intellectual dominance, of neoclassical economics (NCE, also known as market or Walrasian or University of Chicago or, Washington consensus or, occasionally, neo welfare economics). The basic neoclassical model represents the economy as a self-maintaining circular flow among firms and households, driven by the psychological assumptions that humans act principally in a materialistic, self-regarding, and predictable way. Unfortunately the NCE model violates a number of physical laws and is inconsistent with actual human behavior. Consequently the NCE model is unrealistic and a poor predictor of people’s actions, as an array of experimental and physical evidence and recent theoretical breakthroughs demonstrate. Despite the abundance and validity of these critiques, few economists seriously question the neoclassical paradigm that forms the foundation of their applied work. This is a problem because policy makers, scientists, and others turn to economists for answers to important policy questions. The supposed virtues of “privatization,” “free markets,” “consumer choice,” and “cost–benefit analysis” are considered to be self-evident by most practicing economists, as well as many in business and government. In fact the evidence that these concepts are correct or do what most people believe they do is rather slim and contradictory. Thus this chapter is a strong critique of economic theory, in this case NCE [1].
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
This chapter is derived in part from J. Gowdy, C. Hall, K. Klitgaard and L. Krall 2010. The End of Faith-Based Economics. The Corporate Examiner 37:5–11, and Hall, C., Lindenberger, D., Kummel, R., Kroeger, T. and Eichhorn, W., 2001. The need to reintegrate the natural sciences with economics. BioScience, 51: 663–673.
Georgescu-Roegen, N. 1975. Energy and economic myths. Southern Economic Journal, 41: 347–381.
Daly, H., 1977. Steady-State Economics. W. H. Freeman, San Francisco.
Cleveland, C., Costanza, R., Hall, C., and Kaufmann, R., 1984. Energy and the U.S. economy: a Biophysical perspective. Science, 225: 890–897.
Hall, C., Cleveland, C. and Kaufmann, R., 1986. Energy and Resource Quality: The Ecology of the Economic Process. Wiley Interscience, New York.
Hall, C., Lindenberger, D., Kummel, R., Kroeger, T. and Eichhorn, W., 2001. The need to reintegrate the natural sciences with economics. BioScience, 51: 663–673. Also: Kummel R., J. Henn, D. Lindenberger. 2002. Capital, labor, energy and creativity: modeling. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics. 3 (2002) 415–433
Wilson, E., 1998. Consilience: The Unity of Knowledge. Alfred Knopf, New York.
Denison, E.F., 1989. Estimates of Productivity Change by Industry, an Evaluation and an Alternative. The Brookings Institution, Washington, DC.
Ayres, R. and Warr, D., 2005. Accounting for growth: the role of physical work. Change and Economic Dynamics. 16: 211–220.
Cleveland, C.J., 1991. Natural Resource Scarcity and Economic Growth Revisited: Economic and Biophysical Perspectives. Pages 289–317. in Costanza R., ed. Ecological Economics: The Science and Management of Sustainability. New York: Columbia University Press.
Solow, RM. 1974. The economics of resources or the resources of economics. American Economic Review 66: 1–14. Also Solow, R.M., 1994. Perspectives on growth theory. Journal of Economic Perspectives 8, 45–54.
LeClerc, G. and Charles, H., (Eds.) 2008. Making development work: A new Role for science. University of New Mexico Press. Albuquerque
McCauley, J.L. and C. M. Kuffner. 2004. Economic System Dynamics. Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society 1 (2004): pp. 213–220
Leontief W. 1982. Academic economics. Science 217: 104.
Mirowski, P. 1989. More Heat than Light. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Gintis, H., 2000. Beyond Homo economicus: evidence from experimental economics. Ecological Economics. 35: 311–322.
Camerer, C., and Loewenstein, G., 2004. Behavioral economics: past present and future. In: Camerer, C, Loewenstein, G. and Rabin, M (Editors), Advances in Behavioral Economics. Princeton U. Press, Princeton, NJ and Oxford UK 3–52.
Henrich, J. et al., 2001. Cooperation, reciprocity and punishment in fifteen small-scale societies. American Economics Review, 91: 73–78.
Ackerman, F. and Heinzerling, L., 2004. Priceless: On Knowing the Price of Everything and the Value of Nothing. The New Press, New York and London.
Frey, B. and Stutzer, A., 2002. Happiness and Economics: How the Economy and Institutions Affect Well-Being. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
Diener, ES., Diener, M. and Diener, C., 1995. Factors predicting the well-being of nations. Journal of Social Psychology, 69: 851–864.
Brickman, P., Coates, D. and Janoff-Bulman, R., 1978. Lottery winners and accident victims: Is happiness relative? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 36: 917–927.
Blanchflower, D. and Oswald, D. 2000. Well-Being over Time in Britain and the U.S.A. NBER Working Paper No.7481, National Bureau of Economic Analysis. Cambridge, MA.
Lane, R., 2000. The Loss of Happiness in Market Economies. Yale University Press, New Haven and London.
Meyers, D., 2000. The funds, friends, and faith of happy people. American Psychologist. 55: 56–6.
Arrow, K., Dasgupta, P., Goulder, L., Daily, G., Ehrlich, P., Heal, G., Levin, S., Goran-Maler, K., Schneider, S., Starrett, D., Walker, B., 2004. Are we consuming too much? Journal of Economic Perspectives. 18: 147–172.
Gowdy, J., 2004. The revolution in welfare economics and its implications for environmental valuation. Land Economics. 80: 239–257.
Gowdy, J. and J. Erickson. 2005. The approach of ecological economics. Cambridge Journal of Economics. 29 (2): 207–222.
Makgetla, N. and Sideman, R., 1989. The applicability of law and economics to policymaking in the third world. Jour. of Econ. Issues, 23: 35–78.
Hall, C., 2000. Quantifying Sustainable Development: the Future of Tropical Economies. Academic Press, San Diego.
Hall, C.A. S., Pontius, R.G. Coleman L. and Ko J-Y. 1994. The environmental consequences of having a baby in the United State. Population and the Environment. 15: 505–523.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2012 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Hall, C.A.S., Klitgaard, K.A. (2012). The Limits of Conventional Economics. In: Energy and the Wealth of Nations. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-9398-4_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-9398-4_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4419-9397-7
Online ISBN: 978-1-4419-9398-4
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)