Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The Petroleum Revolution

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Energy and the Wealth of Nations

  • 4059 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter focuses on the importance of fossil fuels (coal, gas, and oil) and especially petroleum (meaning natural gas and oil, or sometimes just oil). First we want to ask why petroleum, and especially oil? Why has petroleum been so important, and why is it so hard to unhook ourselves from it? To do that we need to look more broadly for a moment at the energy situation that has faced, and that faces, humanity. Solar energy, either directly or as captured by plants, was and is the principal energy available to run the world or the human economy. It is enormous in quantity but diffuse in quality. As we have developed in the previous chapter, the history of human culture can be viewed as the progressive development of new ways to exploit that solar energy using various conversion technologies, from spear points to fire to agriculture to, now, the concentrated ancient energy of fossil fuels. Until the past few 100 years human activity was greatly limited by the diffuse nature of sunlight and its immediate products, and because that energy was hard to capture and hard to store. Now fossil fuels are cheap and abundant, and they have increased the comfort, longevity, and affluence of most humans, as well as their population numbers [1].

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 74.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Literature

  1. Derived, with substantial modifications from Hall, C., P. Tharakan, J. Hallock, C. Cleveland and M. Jefferson. 2003. Hydrocarbons and the evolution of human culture. Nature 426: 318–322. Updates on EROI are available in a special issue of the Journal Sustainability (in press).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Munasinghe, M. 2002. The sustainomics trans-­disciplinary meta-framework for making development more sustainable: applications to energy issues. Int. J. Sustain. Dev. 5, 125–182.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Interlaboratory Working Group. 2000. Scenarios for a Clean Energy Future <http://www.ornl.gov/ORNL/Energy_Eff/CEF.htm> (Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory LBNL-44029, Berkeley, California).

  4. Hall, C. A. S., Lindenberger, D., Kummel, R., Kroeger, T. and Eichhorn, W. 2001. The need to reintegrate the natural sciences with economics. BioScience 51, 663–673.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Tharakan, P. J., Kroeger, T. and Hall, C. A. S. 2001. Twenty-five years of industrial development: a study of resource use rates and macro-efficiency indicators for five Asian countries. Environ. Sci. Policy 4, 319–332.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Kaufmann, R. K. 2004. The mechanisms for autonomous increases in energy efficiency: a cointegration analysis of the US energy/GDP ratio. Energy J. 25:63–86.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Smulders, S. and de Nooij, M. 2003. The impact of energy conservation on technology and economic growth. Resource Energy Econ. 25, 59–79

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Sadorsky, P. Oil price shocks and stock market activity. 1999 Energy Econ. 21, 449–469. See also Hall C. and Groat, A. 2010. The Corporate Examiner 37: 19–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Tissot, B. P. and Welt, D. H. 1978. Petroleum Formation and Occurrence. Springer-Verlag, New York.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  10. Campbell, C. J. and Laherrère, J. H. 1998. The end of cheap oil. Sci. Am. 278, 78–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. United States Geological Survey (USGS) 2003. The World Petroleum Assessment 2000 <www.usgs.gov>

  12. United States Geological Survey (USGS) 2000. United States Department of Energy Long Term World Oil Supply <http://www.eia.doe.gov/pub/oil_gas/petroleum/presentations/2000/long_term_supply/index.htm>

  13. Hubbert, M. K. Energy Resources (Report to the Committee on Natural Resources) (National Academy of Sciences, Washington DC, 1962).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Hallock, J., Tharakan, P., Hall, C., Jefferson, M. and Wu, W. 2004. Forecasting the availability and diversity of the geography of oil supplies. Energy 30:2017–201. John Hallock, personal communication.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Energy Information Administration, US Department of Energy. 2003. International Outlook 2003. Report No. DOE/EIA-0484(2003), Table 16 at <http://www.eia.doe.gov/oiaf/ieo/oil.html>

  16. Lynch, M. C. 2002. Forecasting oil supply: theory and practice. Q. Rev. Econ. Finance 42, 373–389.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Bartlett, A. 2000. An Analysis of U.S. and World Oil Production Patterns Using Hubbert-Style Curves. Mathematical Geology 32: 1–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Brandt, A. R. 2007. Testing Hubbert. Energy policy 35: 3074–3088.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Kaufmann, R. K. and Shiers, L. D. 2008. Alternatives to conventional crude oil: When, how quickly, and market driven? Ecological Economics, 67: 405–411.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Nashawi, I. S., A. Malallah and M. Al-Bisharah. 2010. Forecasting world crude oil production using multicyclic hubbert model. Energy fuels 24: 1788–1800.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Kaufmann, R. K. and Cleveland, C. J. 2001. Oil Production in the lower 48 states: economic, geological and institutional determinants. Energy J. 22, 27–49.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Kaufmann, R. K. 1991. Oil production in the lower 48 states: Reconciling curve fitting and econometric models. Res. Energy 13, 111–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Hallock, J., Tharakan, P., Hall, C., Jefferson, M. and Wu, W. 2004. Forecasting the availability and diversity of the geography of oil supplies. Energy 30:2017–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Cleveland, C. J., Costanza, R., Hall, C. A. S. and Kaufmann, R. 1984. Energy and the United States economy: a biophysical perspective. Science 225, 890–897.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Gagnon, N., C. A.S. Hall, and L. Brinker. 2009. A Preliminary Investigation of Energy Return on Energy Investment for Global Oil and Gas Production. Energies 2(3), 490–503.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Cooper, C. and Pope, H.1998. Dry wells belie hope for big Caspian reserves. Wall Street J. 12 October.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Hakes. J. 2000. Long term world oil supply: a Presentation Made to the American Association of PetroleumGeochemists, New Orleans, Louisiana  <http:www.eia.doe.gov/pub/oil_gas/petroleum/presentations/2000/long_term_supply/index.htm>

  28. Tainter, J. and Patzek, T. in press. The Gulf oil debacle and our energy future. Springer

    Google Scholar 

  29. Tainter, J. 1988. The Collapse of Complex Systems. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Hirsch, R., Bezdec, R. & Wending, R. (2005). Peaking of world oil production: impacts, mitigation and risk management. U.S. Department of Energy. National Energy Technology Laboratory. Unpublished Report.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Hirsch, R. 2008. Mitigation of maximum world oil production: Shortage scenarios. Energy policy: 36: 881–889.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Hall, C. A. S. (ed). Special issue of journal Sustainability on EROI (in press).

    Google Scholar 

  33. Prieto, P. and C. A. S.Hall. In preparation. EROI of Spain’s solar electricity system.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Murphy, D., C. A.S. Hall and R. Powers. 2010. New perspectives on energy return on (energy) invested (EROI) of corn ethanol. Environment, development and sustainability. 13:179–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Giampietro, M. and K. Mayumi. 2009. The biofuel delusion. Earthscan, London.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Smil, Vaclav. 2011. Global energy: The latest infatuations. American Scientist. 99:212–219.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank S. Ulgiati, R. Kaufmann, and C. Levitan for discussions.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Faculty of Environmental & Forest Biology and Graduate Program in Environmental Science College of Environmental Science & Forestry, State University of New York, Syracuse, NY, 13210, USA

    Charles A. S. Hall (Professor of Systems Ecology)

  2. Social Sciences, Wells College, Aurora, NY, 13026, USA

    Kent A. Klitgaard (Professor of Economics Patti McGill Peterson Professor)

Authors
  1. Charles A. S. Hall
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Kent A. Klitgaard
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Charles A. S. Hall .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Hall, C.A.S., Klitgaard, K.A. (2012). The Petroleum Revolution. In: Energy and the Wealth of Nations. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-9398-4_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-9398-4_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4419-9397-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4419-9398-4

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation