Decentralized Modal Analysis and System Identification Using Embedded Markov Parameter Extraction within Distributed Wireless Sensor Networks
As wireless monitoring systems continue to mature as a viable alternative to traditional wired data acquisition systems, scalable approaches to autonomously processing measurement data in-network are necessary. Embedded data processing has the benefit of improving system scalability, reducing the amount of wireless communications, and reducing overall power consumption. A system identification strategy based on Markov parameters is proposed for embedment within the decentralized computational framework of a wireless sensor network. Utilizing the computational resources of wireless sensors, individual sensor nodes perform local data processing to identify the Markov parameters of a structural system. Eventually, the global structural properties (e.g., mode shapes) are assembled by the wireless sensor network base station via an eigensystem realization algorithm executed using the limited number of Markov parameters transmitted by the wireless sensor nodes. The proposed strategy is evaluated using input-output and output-only data recorded during dynamic testing of a balcony structure.
KeywordsAutocorrelation Phan Crossbow
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 1.Straser, E.G. and A.S. Kiremidjian, A Modular, Wireless Damage Monitoring System for Structures. 1998, John A. Blume Earthquake Engineering Center,Stanford University: Stanford, CA.Google Scholar
- 3.Juang, J.N., M. Phan, and L.G.L. Horta, R.W., Identification of Observer/Kalman Filter Markov Parameters: Theory and Experiment. 1991, Langley Research Center: Hampton, Virginia.Google Scholar
- 4.James, J.H., T.G. Carne, and J.P. Lauffer, The Natural Excitation Technique (NExT) for Modal Parameter Extraction from Operating Structures. The International Journal of Analytical and Experimental Modal Analysis, 1996. 10(4): p. 260–277.Google Scholar
- 5.Van Pelt, T.H. and D.S. Bernstein. Least Squares Identification Using μ-Markov Parameterizations. in 37th IEEE Conference on Decision & Control. 1998. Tampa, FL.Google Scholar
- 6.Holzel, M.S. and D.S. Bernstein. On the Accuracy of Least Squares Estimations of Markov Parameters Based on μ-Markov Models. in 15th International Federation of Automatic Control Symposium on System Identification (IFAC SYSID). 2009. Saint-Malo, France.Google Scholar
- 7.Ho, B.L. and R.E. Kalman, Effective Construction of Linear State-variable Models from Input-Output Functions. Regelungtechnik, 1965. 12: p. 545–548.Google Scholar
- 11.Swartz, R.A., D. Jung, J.P. Lynch, Y. Wang, D. Shi, and M.P. Flynn. Design of a Wireless Sensor for Scalable Distributed In-Network Computation in a Structural Health Monitoring System. in 5th International Workshop on Structural Health Monitoring. 2005. Palo Alto, CA.Google Scholar
- 12.Kim, J., R.A. Swartz, J.P. Lynch, J.J. Lee, and C.G. Lee, Extended-range Narada wireless sensors for rapid reconfigurable vibration monitoring of highway bridges. Smart Structures and Systems, 2010. 6(5–6).Google Scholar