Skip to main content

OMAX testing of a steel bowstring footbridge

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Civil Engineering Topics, Volume 4

Abstract

A recent development in operational modal analysis (OMA) is the possibility of using measured, artificial loads in addition to the unmeasured, ambient excitation, while the ratio between forced and ambient excitation can be low compared to classical experimental modal analysis (EMA). Most of these so-called OMAX algorithms lack the intuitiveness of their EMA and OMA counterparts, since they fit a system model that takes both the measured and the operational excitation into account directly to the measured signals. A more physically intuitive subspace algorithm for OMAX, that starts with an accurate decomposition of the measured joint response in a forced and an ambient part, was recently introduced. In this paper, the performance of this algorithm, which is called CSI-ic/ref, is assessed by means of a case study, where a two-span steel arch footbridge is tested in operational conditions, with and without using additional actuators. From a comparison of the modal parameters with results from a finite elementmodel, an OMA algorithm, and an alternative OMAX algorithm, it can be concluded that CSI-ic/ref yields accurate modal parameter estimates.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. E. Caetano, ´A. Cunha, and C. Moutinho. Implementation of passive devices for vibration control at Coimbra footbridge. In Proceedings of the converence on experimental vibration analysis for civil engineering structures - EVACES07, pages 43–54, Porto, Portugal, October 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  2. B. Cauberghe. Applied frequency-domain system identification in the field of experimental and operational modal analysis. PhD thesis, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  3. B. Cauberghe, P. Guillaume, P. Verboven, and E. Parloo. Identification of modal parameters including unmeasured forces and transient effects. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 265(3):609–625, 2003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. P. Dallard, A.J. Fitzpatrick, A. Flint, S. Le Bourva, A. Low, R.M. Ridsdill Smith, and M. Willford. The London Millennium Footbridge. The Structural Engineer, 79(22):17–33, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  5. K. Deckers, P. Guillaume, D. Lefeber, G. De Roeck, and E. Reynders. Modal testing of bridges using low-weight pneumatic artificial muscle actuators. In Proceedings of IMAC 26, the International Modal Analysis Conference, Orlando, FL, February 2008. CD-ROM.

    Google Scholar 

  6. P. Guillaume, T. De Troyer, C. Devriendt, and G. De Sitter. OMAX - a combined experimental-operational modal analysis approach. In P. Sas and M. De Munck, editors, Proceedings of ISMA2006 International Conference on Noise and Vibration Engineering, pages 2985–2996, Leuven, Belgium, September 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  7. W. Heylen, S. Lammens, and P. Sas. Modal analysis theory and testing. Department of Mechanical Engineering, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Leuven, Belgium, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  8. S.Y. Kung. A new identification and model reduction algorithm via singular value decomposition. In Proceedings of the 12th Asilomar conference on circuits, systems and computers, pages 705–714, Pacific Grove, CA, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  9. E. Parloo, P. Verboven, P. Guillaume, and M. Van Overmeire. Sensitivity-based operational mode shape normalization. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 16(5):757–767, 2002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. B. Peeters and G. De Roeck. Reference-based stochastic subspace identification for output-only modal analysis. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 13(6):855–878, 1999.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. B. Peeters and G. De Roeck. Stochastic system identification for operational modal analysis: A review. ASME Journal of Dynamic Systems, Measurement, and Control, 123(4):659–667, 2001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. R. Pintelon and J. Schoukens. System Identification. IEEE Press, New York, NY, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  13. E. Reynders. System identification and modal analysis in structural mechanics. PhD thesis, Department of Civil Engineering, K.U.Leuven, 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  14. E. Reynders and G. De Roeck. Reference-based combined deterministic-stochastic subspace identification for experimental and operational modal analysis. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 22(3):617–637, 2008.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. E. Reynders and G. De Roeck. On the separation of a measured structural response in a forced and an ambient part for OMAX testing. In Proceedings of ISMA2010 International Conference on Noise and Vibration Engineering, pages 3287–3302, Leuven, Belgium, September 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  16. E. Reynders, D. Degrauwe, G. De Roeck, F.Magalh˜aes, and E. Caetano. Combined experimental-operational modal testing of footbridges. ASCE Journal of Engineering Mechanics, 136(6):687–696, 2010.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer Science + Business Media, LLC

About this paper

Cite this paper

Reynders, E. et al. (2011). OMAX testing of a steel bowstring footbridge. In: Proulx, T. (eds) Civil Engineering Topics, Volume 4. Conference Proceedings of the Society for Experimental Mechanics Series. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-9316-8_15

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-9316-8_15

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4419-9315-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4419-9316-8

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics