Skip to main content

Flight Control Reconfiguration

  • Chapter

Part of the book series: Cooperative Systems ((COSY,volume 2))

Abstract

Research into fault-tolerant control is a very actual problem and attracts many investigators. Their proposed solutions have fallen into two categories: passive and active. In the passive category, the impaired aircraft continues to operate with the same controller; the effectiveness of the scheme depends upon the original control law’s possessing a considerable degree of robustness. The active category involves either an on-line re-design of the control law after failure has occurred and has been detected, or the selection of a new pre-computed control law. In this chapter, the active methods are considered.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Ashkenazi, A. and Bryson, A.E. (1982). Control logic for parameter insensitivity and disturbance attenuation, Journal of Guidance, Control and Dynamics, July–Aug.: 383–388.

    Google Scholar 

  • Binmore, K. (1990). Essays on the Foundations of Game Theory. Basil Blackwell Inc. Oxford, U.K.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Blum, H.S. (1974). Minmax feedback control of uncertain systems. In: Differential Games and Control Theory; Lecture Notes in Pure and Applied Mathematics (E.O. Roxin, P.T. Liu, R.L. Sternberg, Eds.): 241–276.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bryson, A.E. and Ho, Y.C. (1969). Applied Optimal Control, Ginn and Company, Waltham.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caliskan, F. and Hajiyev, Ch.M. (2000). EKF-based surface fault detection and reconfiguration in aircraft control systems. Proc. of the American Control Conference (ACC), Chicago, Illinois: 1220–1224.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chang, S.S.L. and Peng, T.K.C. (1972). Adaptive guaranteed cost control of systems with uncertain parameters, IEEE Trans, on Automatic Control, Vol:7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daellenbach, H.G., Gerorge, J.A., and McNickle, D.C. (1983). Introduction to Operation Research Techniques. Allyn and Bacon Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gadzhiev (Hajiyev), Ch. M. (1992). Dynamic systems diagnosis based on Kaiman filter updating sequences. Automation and Remote Control, No.1: 147–150.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gadzhiev (Hajiyev), Ch. M. (1994). Check of the generalized variance of the Kaiman filter updating sequence in dynamic diagnosis. Automation and Remote Control, Vol. 55, No.8: 1165–1169.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Hajiyev, Ch.M. (1996). The Information Provide of Offshore Platform Supervision and Control, Elm, Baku, 1996 (in Russian).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hajiyev, Ch.M. and Caliskan, F. (1998). Fault tolerant aircraft control system based on Kaiman filtering, 2nd Ankara International Aerospace Conference (AIA’98), Ankara, Turkey: 220–227.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hajiyev, Ch. M. and Caliskan, F. (1999). Fault diagnosis in dynamic systems via Kaiman filter innovation sequence, IFAC 14th World Congress, Beijing, China: 499–504.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hajiyev, Ch. and Caliskan, F. (2000). Sensor/actuator fault diagnosis based on statistical analysis of innovation sequence and Robust Kaiman Filtering, Aerospace Science and Technology, 4:415–422.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Hajiyev Ch.M. and F. Caliskan. (2001). Integrated sensor/actuator FDI and reconfigurable control for fault-tolerant flight control system design. The Aeronautical Journal, V. 105, No. 1051,Sept.: 525–533.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howell, W.E., Bundick, W.T., Hueschen, R.M. and Ostroff, A.J. (1983). Restructurable Controls for Aircraft. AIAA Guidance and Control Conf, Gatlinburg: 646–653.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huber, R.R. and McCulloch, B. (1984). Self-repairing flight control system, Society of Automotive Engineers Inc. Aerospace Congress Exposition: 477–496.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaiman, R.E. (1964). When is a linear control system optimal? J. Basic Eng. Trans, of ASME, Series D, 861 March.

    Google Scholar 

  • McMahan, J. (1978). Flight 1080, Air Line Pilot, July: 610.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kosmidou, O.I. and Bertrand, P. (1987). Robust controller design for systems with large parameter variations, Int. Journal of Control, Vol: 45, No.3: 927–938.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Looze D.P., Weiss, J.L., Eterno, J.S. and Barret, N.M. (1985). An automatic redesign approach for restructurable control systems. IEEE Control Systems Magazine, May: 16–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • McLean, D. (1990). Automatic Flight Control Systems, Prentice Hall International (UK).

    Google Scholar 

  • McLean, D. and Aslam-Mir S. (1991). Reconfigurable Flight Control Systems. Proc. on the Int. Conference on Control’ 91, Edinburgh, March: 234–242.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mehra, R.K., and Peschon, J. (1971). An innovations approach to fault detection and diagnosis in dynamic systems. Automatica, Vol.7: 637–640.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miyazawa, Y. (1992). Robust flight control system design with multiple model approach. J. Guidance, 151, No:3, May–June: 785–788.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Montoya, R.J., Howell, W.E., Bundick, W.T., Ostroff, A.J., Hueschen, R.M. and Beicastro, C.M. (eds.) (1982). Restructurable controls, NASA CP 2277. Proceedings of a workshop held at NASA Langley Research Centre, Hampton, Virginia.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Transportation Safety Board (1979). Aircraft Accident Report; American Airlines, Inc. DC10, Chicago O’Hare Int. Airport, May: 23–24 and 54–55, NTSB-AAR-79-17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patton, R.J. (1997). Fault tolerant control: The 1997 situation, IFAC Symposium on Fault Detection, Supervision, and Safety for Technical Processes, SAFEPROCESS’97, Hull, UK: 1033–1055.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rago, C., Prasanth, R., Mehra, R.K. and Fortenbaugh, R. (1998). Failure detection and identification and fault tolerant control using the IMM-KF with applications to the Eagle-Eye UAV. Proc. on the 37th IEEE Conference on Decision & Control, Tampa, Florida USA, December: 4208–4213.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rattan, K.S. (1985). Reconfiguration of flight control systems after effector failure, Proc. of Fourth International Conference on System Engineering, Coventry Polytechnic UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schlee, F.H., Standish, C.L. and Toda, N.F. (1967). Divergence in the Kaiman Filter. AIAA J., V.5, June: 1114–1120.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vinkler A. and Wood, L.J. (1978). A comparison of several techniques for designing controllers of uncertain dynamic systems. Proceedings IEEE Conf. on Decision and Control 18:31–38.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2003 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Hajiyev, C., Caliskan, F. (2003). Flight Control Reconfiguration. In: Fault Diagnosis and Reconfiguration in Flight Control Systems. Cooperative Systems, vol 2. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-9166-9_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-9166-9_10

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4613-4818-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4419-9166-9

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics