Skip to main content

Medicalization and Regulation of Deviant Religions

An Application of Conrad and Schneider’s Model

  • Chapter
Regulating Religion

Part of the book series: Critical Issues in Social Justice ((CISJ))

Abstract

Discussions over the past few decades of involvement in new religions or “cults” in medical and social scientific journals, courtroom trials, and media treatments reveal a volatile controversy about the meaning of membership in groups such as the Unification Church, the Hare Krishna, Scientology, The Family, and other relatively “high demand” religions.1 Such discussions have significant implications for regulating these controversial groups.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • American Psychiatric Association. (1980). The diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders. 3rd edition revised. Washington, D.C.: American Psychiatric Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anthony, D. (1990). Religious movements and brainwashing litigation: Evaluating key testimony. In T. Robbins & D. Anthony (Eds.), In gods we trust, 2nd ed. (pp. 295–344). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anthony, D. (2001). Tactical ambiguity and brainwashing formulations: Science or pseudoscience. In B. Zablocki & T. Robbins (eds.), Misunderstanding cults (pp. 215–317). Toronto: University of Toronto Press,

    Google Scholar 

  • Anthony, D. & Robbins, T. (1992). Law, social science, and the ‘brainwashing’ exception in the First Amendment. Behavioral Sciences & Law,10, 5–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anthony, D. & Robbins, T. (1995). Negligence, coercion, and the protection of religious belief. Journal of Church and State, 37, 509–536.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anthony, D., Robbins, T. & McCarthy, J. (1980). Legitimating repression. Society, 17, 39–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barker, E. (1981). Who’d be a Moonie? A comparative study of those who joins the Unification Church in Britain. In B. Wilson (Ed.), The social impact of new religious movements. New York: Rose of Sharon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barker, E. (1989). New religious movements. London: HMSO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker, H. (1963). Outsiders: Studies in the sociology of deviance. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beckford, J. (1978). Accounting for conversion. British Journal of Sociology, 29, 249–262.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beckford, J. (1985). Cult controversies. London: Tavistock.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beckford, J. & Coles, M. (1988). British and American responses to new religious movements. Bulletin of the John Rylands University Library of Manchester, 70: 209–224.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berger, P. (1967). The sacred canopy. New York: Doubleday.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bromley, D. (1983). Conservatorships and deprogramming: Legal and political prospects. In D. Bromley & J. Richardson (Eds.), The brain washing/deprogramming controversy (pp. 267–293). New York: Edwin Mellen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bromley, D. & Breschel, E. (1992). General population and institutional elite support for control of new religious movements: Evidence from national survey data. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 10, 39–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bromley, D. & Richardson, J. (1983). The brainwashing/deprogramming controversy. Toronto: Edwin Mellen Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bromley, D. & Robbins, T. (1993). The role of government in regulating new and unconventional religions. In J. Wood & D. Davis (eds.), The role of government in monitoring and regulating religion in public life. (pp. 205–240). Waco, TX:: Dawson Institute of Church-State Studies, Baylor University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, L. (1985). Advances in the psychology of religion. New York: Pergamon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carter, L. (1987). The ‘new renunciates’ of the Bhagwan Shree Rajneesh: Observations and identification of problems of interpreting new religious movements. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 26, 148–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, J. (1978). Problems in referral of cult members. Journal of the National Association of Private Psychiatric Hospitals, 9(4), 19–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, J. (1979). Cults. Journal of the American Medical Association 242: 279–281.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conrad, P. & Schneider, J. (1980). Deviance and medicalization. St Louis: Mosby.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conrad P. and Schneider, J. (1992). Deviance and medicalization, Expanded Edition. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conway F. & Siegelman. (1978). Snapping: America’s epidemic of sudden personality change. New York: J.B. Lippincott.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conway F. & Seigleman (1982). Information disease: Have cults created a new mental illness? Science Digest, 90, 88–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawson, L. (1998). Comprehending cults. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Delgado, R. (1977). Religious totalism. Southern California Law Review, 51, 1–99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Delgado, R. (1979). Religious totalism as slavery. New York University Review of Law and Social Change, 4, 51–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Delgado, R. (1989). Options for intervention. In M. Galanter (Ed.), Cults and new religious movements (pp. 291–304). Washington, D.C.: American Psychiatric Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dillon, J. & Richardson, J. (1994). The ‘cult’ concept: A politics of representation analysis. SYZYGY: Journal of Alternative Religion and Culture, 3, 185–197.

    Google Scholar 

  • Durham C. (1994). Treatment of religious minorities in the United States. In European Consortium for Church and State Research: The legal status of religious minorities in the countries of the European Union (pp. 323–379). Thessatoniki: Sakkoulas Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flynn, F. (1987). Criminalizing conversion: The legislative assault on new religions. In J. Day & W. Laufer (Eds.), Crime, values, and religion (pp. 153–191). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fort, J. (1985). What is ‘brainwashing,’ and who says so? In B. Kilbourne (Ed.), Scientific research and new religions: Divergent perspectives (pp. 57–63). San Francisco: American Association for the Advancement of Science.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galanter, M. (1978).The ‘relief effect:’ A sociobiological model of neurotic distress and large group therapy. American Journal of Psychiatry, 135, 588–591.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galanter, M. (1980). Psychological induction into the large-group: Findings from a modern religious sect. American Journal of Psychiatry, 137, 1574–1579.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galanter, M. (1989). Cults and new religious movements. Washington, D.C.: American Psychiatric Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galanter, M. & Buckley, P. (1978). Evangelical religion and meditation: Psychotherapeutic effects. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 166, 685–691.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Galanter, M, Rabkin, R., Rabkin, F. & Deutsch, A. (1979). The ’Moonies:’ A psychological study of conversion and membership in a contemporary religious sect. American Journal of Psychiatry, 136, 165–169.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gershman, C. (1984). Psychiatric abuse in the Soviet Union. Society, 21(5), 54–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ginsburg, G. & Richardson, J. (1998). “Brainwashing” evidence in light of Daubert. In Helen Reece (Ed.), Law and science (pp. 265–288). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greil, A. L. & D. Rudy (1984). What have we learned from process models of conversion: An examination of ten case studies., Sociological Focus, 17: 305–323.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Groves, M. A. (1986). Marginal religious groups as precursors of a sociocultural revolution. Thought: A Review of Culture and Ideas, LXI: 267–276.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gutman, J. (1985). The legislative assault on new religions. In T. Robbins, W. Shepherd, & J. McBride (Eds.), Cults, culture, and the law. Chico, CA: Scholars Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hadden, J. (1989). The role of mental health agents in the social control of religious deviants: A comparative examination of the USSR and the United States. Paper presented at conference on Psychopathology and Religion, Kracow, Poland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hargrove, B. (1983). Social sources and consequences of the brainwashing controversy. In D. Bromley & J, Richardson (Eds.), The brain washing/deprogramming controversy (pp. 299–308). New York: Edwin Mellen Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hopkins, R. (1978). The hospital viewpoint: Mental illness or social maladjustment? Journal of the National Association of Private Psychiatric Hospitals, 9(4), 22–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Introvigne, M. (1998). Blacklisting or greenlisting? A European perspective on the new cult wars. Nova Religio 2: 16–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kelley, D. (1983). Deprogramming and religious liberty. In D. Bromley & J. Richardson (Eds.) The brainwashing/deprogramming controversy (pp. 309–318). New York: Edwin Mellen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kilbourne B. & Richardson, J. (1981). Cults versus families: A case of misattribution of cause? Marriage and Family Review, 4, 81–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kilbourne, B. & Richardson, J. (1984). Psychotherapy and new religions in a pluralistic society. American Psychologist, 39, 237–251.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kilbourne, B. & Richardson, J. (1985). Social experimentation: Self process or social role? International Journal of Social Psychiatry, 31, 13–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kilbourne, B. & Richardson, J. (1986). The communalization of religious experience in contemporary religious groups. Journal of Community Psychology, 14, 206–212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kilbourne, B. & Richardson, J. (1988). A social psychological analysis of healing. Journal of Integrative and Eclectic Psychotherapy, 7, 20–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuner, W. (1983). New religions and mental health. In E. Barker (Ed.), Of gods and men: New religious movements in the west (pp. 255–263). Macon, GA: Mercer University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • LeMoult, J. (1983). Deprogramming members of religious sects. In D. Bromley & J. Richardson (Eds.) The brainwashing/deprogramming controversy (pp. 234–257). New York: Edwin Mellen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, J. (1994). From the ashes: A critical look at Waco. Santa Barbara: University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lofland, J. (1966). Doomsday cult. New York: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lofland, J. & R. Stark. (1965). Becoming a ‘world-saver:’ A theory of conversion to a deviant perspective. American Sociological Review, 30, 862–874.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malony, N. (1987). Anticultism: The ethics of psychologists’ relations to new religions. Paper presented at annual meeting of the American Psychological Association, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muffler, J., Langrod, J., Richardson, J., & Ruiz, P. (1997). Religion. In J. Lowinson, P. Ruiz, R. Millman, & J. Langrod (Eds.), Substance abuse: A comprehensive textbook, 3rd Edition (pp. 492–499). Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nicholi, A. (1974). A new dimension of the youth culture. American Journal of Psychiatry, 131, 396–401.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pfiefer, J. (1992). The psychology of framing cults: Schematic presentations and cult evaluations.Journal of Applied Psychology, 22, 531–544.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pfiefer, J. & Ogloff, J. (1992). Cults and the Law. Special Edition of Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 10, 1–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poling, T. & Kenny, J. (1986). The Hare Krishna character type: A study in sensate personality. L character, NY: Edwin Mellen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richardson J. (1980). Peoples’ Temple and Jonestown: A corrective comparison and critique. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 19, 239–255.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, J. (1985a). Active versus passive converts: Paradigm conflict in conversion recruitment research. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 24, 163–179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, J. (1985b). Psychological and psychiatric studies of new religions. In L. Brown (Ed.), Advances in psychology of religion (pp. 209–223). New York: Pergamon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, J. (1986). Consumer protection and deviant religion. Review of Religious Research, 28, 168–179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, J. (1989). The psychology of induction. In M. Galanter (ed.), Cults and new religious movements (pp. 211–238). Washington, D.C.: American Psychiatric Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, J. (1991a). Cult/brainwashing cases and the freedom of religion. Journal of Church and State, 33, 55–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, J. (1991b). Reflexivity and objectivity in the study of controversial new religions. Religion, 21, 305–318.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, J. (1992a). Mental health of cult consumers: Legal and scientific controversy. In J. Schumaker (Ed.), Religion and mental Health (pp. 233–244). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, J. (1992b). Public opinion and the tax evasion trial of Reverend Moon. Behavioral Sciences & Law, 10, 53–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, J. (1993a). Definitions of cult: From sociological-technical to popular negative. Review of Religious Research, 34: 348–356.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, J. (1993b). Religiosity as deviance: Use and misuse of the DSM with participants in new religions. Deviant Behavior, 14,1–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, J. (1993c). A social psychological critique of “brainwashing” claims about recruitment to new religions. In J. Hadden & D. Bromley (Eds.), The handbook of cults and Sects in America (pp. 75–97). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, J. (1995a). Clinical and personality assessment of participants in new religions. International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 5, 145–170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, J. (1995b). Legal status of minority religions in the United States. Social Compass, 42, 249–264.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, J. (1995c). Manufacturing consent About Koresh: A critical analysis of the role of the media in the Waco tragedy. In S. Wright (Ed.), Armageddon in Waco (pp. 153–176). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, J. (1995d). Minority religions (“cults”) and the law: Comparisons of the United States, Europe, and Australia. University of Queensland Law Journal, 18,183–207.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, J. (1995e). Minority religions, religious freedom, and the new pan European political and judicial institutions. Journal of Church and State, 37, 39–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, J. (1995f). Two steps forward, one back: Psychiatry, psychology, and the new religions. International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 5, 181–185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, J. (1996a). “Brainwashing” claims and minority religions outside the United States: Cultural diffusion of a questionable concept in the legal arena. Brigham Young University Law Review, 1996, 873–904.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, J. (1996b). Journalistic bias toward new religious movements in Australia. Journal of Contemporary Religion, 11, 289–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, J. (1997). Sociology, “brainwashing” claims about new religions, and freedom of religion. In P. Jenkins & S. Kroll-Smith (Eds.), Sociology on trial: Sociologists as expert witnesses (115–134). New York: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, J. (1998). The accidental expert. Nova Religio 2: 31–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, J. (2001). Minority religions and the context of violence: A conflict/interactionist perspective, Terrorism and Political Violence, 13: 103–133.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, J. & Stewart, M. (1979). Conversion process models and the Jesus Movements, in J. Richardson (Ed.) Conversion careers: In and out of the new religions (pp. 24–42). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, J., Stewart, M. & Simmonds, R. (1979). Organized miracles. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, J., van Driel, B. & B. Kilbourne. (1989). Alternative religions and economic individualism, in M. Lynn & D. Moberg (eds.), Research in the social scientific study of religion (pp. 33–56). Green-wich, CT: JAI Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, J. & van Driel, B. (1997). Journalist attitudes toward new religions. Review of Religious Research. 39, 116–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, J. T. & Edelman, B. (2002). Cult controversies and legal developments concerning new religions in Japan and China. In D. Davis & G. Besier (Eds.). International perspectives on freedom and equality of religious belief (pp. 183–212). Waco, TX: Baylor University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, J., Ginsburg, G., Gatowski, S., & Dobbin, S. (1995). Problems Applying Daubert to psychological syndrome evidence. Judicature, 79(1), 10–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robbins, T. (1985). Government regulatory powers over religious movements: Deviant groups as test cases. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 24, 231–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robbins, T. (1988). Cults, converts, and charisma. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robbins, T. & Anthony, D. (1982). Deprogramming, medicalization, and the medicalization of deviant religious groups. Social Problems, 29, 283–297.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robbins, T., Anthony, D., & Curtis, T. (1975). Youth culture religious movements: Evaluating the integrative hypothesis. Sociological Quarterly, 16, 48–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robbins, T. & Bromley, D. (1992). Social experimentation and the significance of American new religions. In M. Lynn & D. Moberg (Eds.), Research in the Social Scientific Study of Religion (pp. 1–28). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robbins, T., Anthony, D., & McCarthy, J. (1983). Legitimating repression. In D. Bromley & J. Richardson (Eds.), The brainwashing/deprogramming controversy (pp. 319–328). New York: Edwin Mellen Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosen, A. & Nordquist. T. (1980). Ego developmental level and values in a yogic community. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39, 1152–1160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenberg, A. (1978). Legal issues in the treatment of cult members. Journal of the National Association of Private Psychiatric Hospitals, 9(4), 22–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross, M. (1983). Clinical profiles of Hare Krishna devotees. American Journal of Psychiatry, 140, 416–420.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross, M. (1985). Mental health in Hare Krishna devotees: A longitudinal study. American Journal of Social Psychiatry, 4, 65–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saliba, J. (1986). Learning from the new religious movements. Thought: A Review of Culture and Ideas LXI: 225–240.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saliba, J. (1993). The new religions and mental health. Pp. 99–113, In J. Hadden & D. Bromley (Eds.), The handbook of cults and sects in America (pp. 99–113). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schein, E., Schneir, I., & Barker, C. (1961). Coercive persuasion, New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Selengut, C. (1988). American Jewish Converts to New Religious Movements. The Jewish Journal of Sociology, 30, 95–109.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shapiro, R. (1983). Of robots, persons, and the protection of religious beliefs. Southern California Law Review, 56, 1277–1318.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sherwood, C. (1991). Inquisition: The persecution and prosecution of the Reverend Sun Myung Moon. Washington, D.C.: Regnery Gateway.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shupe, A. & Bromley, D. (1980). The new vigilantes. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shupe, A. & Bromley. D. (1994). Anticult movements in crosscultural perspective. New York: Garland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shapiro, E. (1977). Destructive cultism. American Family Physician, 15(2), 80–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singer, M. (1978). Therapy with excult members. Journal of the National Association of Private Psychiatric Hospitals, 9(4), 14–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singer, M. (1979). Coming out of the cults. Psychology Today, 12, 72–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singer, M. (1983). Transcript of testimony in George v. 1SKCON. Los Angeles District Court; 248 pages.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singer, M. (1994). Cults in our midst. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snow, D. & C. Phillips. (1980). The Lofland Stark conversion model: A critical reassessment. Social Problems, 27: 430–447.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spector, M. & Kituse, J. (1977). Constructing social problems. Hawthorne, NY: Aldine de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Straus, R. (1979). Religious conversion as a personal and collective accomplishment. Sociological Analysis, 40, 158–165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strong, P. (1979). Sociological imperialism and the profession of medicine: A critical examination of the thesis of medical imperialism. Social Science Med, 13A, 199–221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sundberg, N., Latkin, C, Littman, C, & Hagen, R. (1990). Personality in a religious commune: CPIs in Rajneeshpuram. Journal of Personality Assessment, 55, 7–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taslimi, C., Hood, R., & Watson, P. (1991). Assessment of former members of Shiloh: The Adjective Checklist 17 years later. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 30, 306–311.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ungerleider, T. & Wellisch, D. (1979). Coercive persuasion (brainwashing), religious cults and deprogramming. American Journal of Psychiatry, 136, 279–282.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Driel, B. & Richardson, J. (1988a). The categorization of new religious movements in American print media. Sociological Analysis, 49, 171–183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Diel, B. & Richardson, J. (1988b). Print media treatment of new religious movements. Journal of Communication, 38, 377–391.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiss, A. (1987). Psychological distress and well-being in Hare Krishna. Psychological Reports, 61, 23–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weiss, A. & Comprey, A. (1987). Personality characteristics of Hare Krishna. Journal of Personality Assessment, 51, 399–413.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weiss, A. & Mendoza, R. (1990). Effects of acculturation into the Hare Krishna on mental health and personality. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 29, 173–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woolgar, S. & Pawluch, D. (1985). Ontological gerrymandering: The anatomy of social problems explanations? Social Problems, 32, 214–227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wright, S. (1995). Armageddon in Waco. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zablocki, B. (2001). Towards a demystified and disinterested scientific theory of brainwashing. In B. Zablocki & T. Robbins (eds.), Misunderstand ing cults (pp. 159–214). Toronto: University of Toronto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zablocki, B. & Robbins, T. (2001). Misunderstanding Cults, Toronto: University of Toronto Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2004 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Richardson, J.T., Stewart, M.W. (2004). Medicalization and Regulation of Deviant Religions. In: Richardson, J.T. (eds) Regulating Religion. Critical Issues in Social Justice. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-9094-5_32

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-9094-5_32

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-306-47887-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4419-9094-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics