Advertisement

Mechanistic Equations to Represent Digestion and Fermentation

  • Richard A. Kohn
Part of the Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology book series (AEMB, volume 537)

Abstract

Current mathematical models use different forms of equations to represent feed degradation and microbial fermentation in the rumen. For example, the Cornell Net Carbohydrate and Protein System (CNCPS; Sniffen et al., 1992) assumes that feed digestion rate is first order with respect to substrate, but the models of Baldwin et al. (1987) and Dijkstra et al. (1992) assume Michaelis-Menten kinetics. A model proposed by Kohn and Boston (2000) suggests an alternative form of equations that incorporates the Second Law of Thermodynamics to represent fermentation processes in the rumen. The purpose of this paper is to explore the differences among these approaches, including the form of the equations, the theoretical basis and assumptions, and the behavior. This analysis will identify a number of important research questions to pursue.

Keywords

Methane Production Volatile Fatty Acid Concentration ofES Mechanistic Equation Propionate Production 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Allen, M.S., and Mertens, D.R., 1988, Evaluating constraints on fiber digestion by rumen microbes, J. Nutr. 118:261–270.Google Scholar
  2. Baldwin, R.L., Thornley, J.H.M., and Beever, D.E., 1987, Metabolism of the lactating cow. II. Digestive elements of a mechanistic model, J. Dairy Res. 54:107–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Chang, R., 1981, The Second Law of Thermodynamics, in: Physical Chemistry with Applications to Biological Systems, 2nd ed., Macmillian, New York.Google Scholar
  4. Dijkstra, J., Neal, H.D.C., Beever, D.E., and France, J., 1992, Simulation of nutrient digestion, absorption and outflow in the rumen: model description, J. Nutr. 122:2239–2256.Google Scholar
  5. France, J., Thornley, J.H.M., and Beever, D.E., 1982, A mathematical model of the rumen, J. Agric. Sci. Camb. 99:343–353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Kohn, R.A., and Boston, R.C., 2000, The role of thermodynamics in controlling rumen metabolism, in: Modelling Nutrient Utilization in Farm Animals, J.P. McNamara, J. France, and D.E. Beever, eds, CABI Publishing, Wallingford.Google Scholar
  7. Mertens, D.R., 1993, Rate and extent of digestion, in: Quantitative Aspects of Ruminant Digestion and Metabolism, J.M. Forbes and J. France, eds, CABI Publishing, Wallingford.Google Scholar
  8. Neal, H.D.C., Dijkstra, J., and Gill, M., 1992, Simulation of nutrient digestion, absorption and outflow in the rumen: model evaluation, J., Nutr. 122:2257–2272.Google Scholar
  9. prins, R.A., 1977, Biochemical activities of gut micro–organisms, in: Microbial Ecology ofthe Gut, R.T.J. Clarke and T. Bauchop, eds, Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
  10. Russell, J.B., 1998, The importance of pH in the regulation of ruminal acetate to propionate ratio and methane production in vitro, J. Dairy Sci. 81:3222–3230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Russell, J.B., and Strobel, H.J., 1989, Effect of ionophores on ruminal fermentation, Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 55:1–6.Google Scholar
  12. Sniffen, C.J., O’Connor, J.D., Van Soest, P.J., Fox, D.G., and Russell, J.B., 1992, A net carbohydrate and protein system for evaluating cattle diets: II. Carbohydrate and protein availability, J. Anim. Sci. 70:3562– 3577.Google Scholar
  13. Van Soest, P.J., 1994, Mathematical applications: digestibility, in: Nutritional Ecology of the Ruminant, 2nd ed. Cornell University Press, Ithaca.Google Scholar
  14. Wolfe, R.S., and Higgins, I.J., 1979, Microbial biochemistry of methane -- a study in contrasts. Microbial Biochem. 21:267–353.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • Richard A. Kohn
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.University of MarylandDepartment of Animal and Avian ScienceCollege Park
  2. 2.University of MarylandDepartment of Animal and Avian SciencesCollege Park

Personalised recommendations