Advertisement

Reframing Violence Risk Assessment for Female Juvenile Offenders

  • Candice L. Odgers
  • Melinda G. Schmidt
  • Dickon Reppucci
Part of the Perspectives in Law & Psychology book series (PILP, volume 19)

Abstract

The assessment of risk for future violence is a task that clinicians and criminal justice practitioners are faced with on a daily basis. Recent advances in risk assessment research have led to an increased understanding of the empirical relationships between risk factors and violent outcomes among adult male populations (see Borum, 1996; Douglas & Ogloff, 2003; Monahan & Steadman, 1994). Simultaneously, a plethora of risk assessment instruments, such as the Violence Risk Appraisal Guide (VRAG; Harris, Rice, & Quinsey, 1993) Psychopathy Checklist-Revised (PCL-R; Hare, 1991), Psychopathy Checklist-Screening Version (PCL-SV; Hart, Cox, & Hare, 1995) and Historical and Clinical Risk Guide (HCR-20; Webster, Douglas, Eaves, & Hart, 1997) have been developed and tested widely among adult male forensic populations.

Keywords

Risk Assessment Female Youth Female Offender Violence Risk Risk Assessment Instrument 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Achenbach, T. M. (1991). Manual for the Youth Self-Report and 1991 profile. Burlington: University of Vermont, Department of Psychiatry.Google Scholar
  2. Artz, S. (1998). Sex, power, and the violent school girl. Toronto: Trifolium.Google Scholar
  3. Bender, D., & Losel, F. (1997). Protective and risk effects of peer relations and social support on antisocial behaviour in adolescents from multi-problem milieus. Journal of Adolescence, 20, 661–678.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bergsmann, I. R. (1989). The forgotten few: Juvenile female offenders. Federal Probation, 12, 73–78.Google Scholar
  5. Bjorkqvist, K., & Niemela, P. (1992). Of mice and women: Aspects of female aggression. San Diego: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  6. Borum, R., Bartel, P., & Forth, A. (2002). Manual for the structured assessment of violence risk in youth (SAVRY). University of South Florida. Google Scholar
  7. Borum, R. (1996). Improving the clinical practice of violence risk assessment: Technology, guidelines, and training. American Psychologist, 51, 945–956.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Brennan, T., & Austin, J. (1997). Women in jail: Classification issues. Washington, DC: U. S. Department of Justice, National Institute of Corrections.Google Scholar
  9. Cauffman, E., & Steinberg, L. (2000). The cognitive and affective influences of adolescent decision making. Temple haw Review, 68, 1763–1789.Google Scholar
  10. Chesney-Lind, M., & Sheldon, R. (1998). Girls, delinquency, and juvenile justice (2nd ed. ). Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.Google Scholar
  11. Coontz, P., Lidz, C., & Mulvey, E. (1994). Gender and the assessment of dangerousness in the psychiatric emergency room. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 17(4), 369–376.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Corrado, R., Odgers, C, & Cohen, I. (2001). The use of incarceration for female youth: Protection for whom? Canadian Journal of Criminology, 42, 189–206.Google Scholar
  13. Corrado, R., Cohen, I., & Odgers, C. (2000). Teen violence in Canada. In A. M. Hoffman & R. W. Summers (Eds. ), Teen violence: A global view. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.Google Scholar
  14. Coulson, G., Flacqua, G., Nutbrown, V. Giulekas, D., & Cudjoe, F. (1996). Predictive utility of the LSI for incarcerated female offenders. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 23, 427–439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Crick, N. R., & Bigbee, M. A. (1998). Relational and overt forms of peer victimization: A multiinformant approach. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 66, 337–347.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Crick, N. R., & Grotpeter, J. K. (1995). Relational aggression, gender, and social-psychological adjustment. Child Development, 66, 710–722.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Cunningham, A., Baker, L., Mazaheri, N., Ashbourne, L., VanBrunschot, M., & Currie, M. (2000), Best practice programming for phase II young offenders: A literature review. London: Centre for Children and Families in the Justice System.Google Scholar
  18. Douglas, K. S., & Ogloff, R. P. (2003). Multiple facets of risk for violence: The impact of judgmental specificity on structured decisions about risk. International Journal of Forensic Mental Health, 2, 19–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Duffy, A. (1996). Bad girls in hard times: Canadian female juvenile offenders. In G. O’Bireck (Ed. ), Not a kid anymore (pp. 203–220). Scarborough, ON: Nelson Canada.Google Scholar
  20. Farrington, D. P. (1989). Predictors, causes, and correlates of male youth violence. In M. Tonry & M. H. Moore (Eds. ), Crime and justice: A review of research: Vol. 24. Youth violence (pp. 421–476). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  21. FBI Uniform Crime Report. (September 2002). Online Available at:http://www.fbi.gov/ucr/ucr.htm
  22. Fergusson, D. M., & Horwood, J. H. (2002). Male and female offending trajectories. Development and Psychopathology, 14, 159–177.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Forth, A. E. (1996). Psychopathy in adolescent offenders: Assessment, family background, and violence. In D. J. Cooke, A. E. Forth, J. P. Newman, & R. D. Hare (Eds. ), Issues in criminological and legal psychology: No. 24, International perspectives on psychopathy (pp. 42–44). Leicester, UK: British Psychological Society.Google Scholar
  24. Funk, S. (1999). Risk assessment for juveniles on probation: A focus on gender. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 26, 44–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Gendreau, P., Little, T., & Goggin, C. (1996). A meta-analysis of the predictors of adult offender recidivism: What works! Criminology, 34, 574–607.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Gottlieb, G., & Halpern, C. T. (2002). A relational view of causality in normal and abnormal development. Development and Psychopathology, 14, 421–535.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Griffiths, C. T., & A. Cunningham (2000). Canadian corrections. Toronto: ITP Nelson.Google Scholar
  28. Grisso, T. (1998). Forensic evaluation of juveniles. Sarasota, FL. : Professional Resource Press/Professional Resource Exchange, Inc.Google Scholar
  29. Hare, R. D. (1991). The Hare Psychopathy Checklist¡ªRevised. Toronto: Multi Health Systems.Google Scholar
  30. Hare, R. D., McPherson, L. E., & Forth, A. E. (1988). Male psychopaths and their criminal careers. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 56, 710–714.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Harris, G. T., Rice, M. E., & Cormier, C. (1991). Psychopathy and violent recidivism. Law and Human Behavior, 26, 377–394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Harris, G. T., Rice, M. E., & Quinsey, V. L. (1993). Violent recidivism of mentally disordered offenders: The development of a statistical prediction instrument. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 20, 315–335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Hart, S. D., Cox, D. N., & Hare, R. D. (1995). Manual for the Psychopathy Checklist: Screening Version (PCL: SV). Toronto: Multi-Health Systems.Google Scholar
  34. Hart, S. D. (1998). The role of psychopathy in assessing risk for violence: Conceptual and methodological issues. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 3, 121–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Heimer, K., & DeCoster, S. (1999). The gendering of violent delinquency. Criminology, 37, 277–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Horowitz, R., & Pottieger, A. E. (1991). Gender bias in juvenile justice handling of seriously crime-involved youths. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 28, 75–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Hoyt, S., & Scherer, D. G. (1998). Female juvenile delinquency: Misunderstood by the juvenile justice system, neglected by social science. Law and Human Behavior, 22, 81–107.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Kropp, R., Hart, S., Webster, C. & Eaves, D. (1999). Manual for the Spousal Risk Assessment Guide (3rd ed. ). Toronto: Multi-Health Systems.Google Scholar
  39. Lanctot, N. (2002, May). Violence among females from adolescence to adulthood: Results from a longitudinal study. Paper presented at the Vancouver Conference on Aggressive and Violent Girls, Vancouver, Canada.Google Scholar
  40. Leschied, A., Cummings, A., Van Brunschot, M., Cunningham, A., & Saunders, A. (2000). Female adolescent aggression: A review of the literature and the correlates of aggression (User Report No. 2000–04). Ottawa: Solicitor General of Canada.Google Scholar
  41. Lewis, D. O., Yeager, C. A., Cobham-Portorreal, C. S., & Klein, N. (1991). A follow-up of female delinquents: Maternal contributions to the perpetuation of deviance. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 30, 197–201.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Levene, K. S., Augimeri, L. K., Pepler., D. J., Walsh, M. M., Webster, C. D., & Koegl, C. J. (2001). Early Assessment Risk List for Girls (EARL-21G). Toronto: Earlscourt Child and Family Centre.Google Scholar
  43. Lipsey, M. W., & Derzon, J. H. (1998). Predictors of violence and serious delinquency in adolescence and early adulthood: A synthesis of longitudinal research. In R. Loeber & D. P. Farrington (Eds. ), Serious and violent juvenile offenders: Risk factors and successful interventions (pp. 86–105). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  44. MacArthur Violence Risk Assessment Study: Executive Summary. Retrieved December 2, 2001 from the MacArthur Research Network on Mental Health and the Law Web site. http://www. macarthur. virginia. edu/risk. html Google Scholar
  45. Miller, P. A., & Eisenberg, N. (1988). The relation of empathy to aggressive and externalizing/ antisocial behavior. Psychological Bulletin, 103, 324–344.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Moffitt, T. E. (1993). Adolescence-limited and life course-persistent antisocial behavior developmental taxonomy. Psychological Review, 100, 674–701.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Moffitt, T. E., Caspi, A., Rutter, M., & Silva, P. A. (2001). Sex differences in antisocial behavior: Conduct disorder, delinquency, and violence in the Dunedin Longitudinal Study. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  48. Monahan, J. (1995). The violence prediction scheme: Assessing dangerousness in high-risk men. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 22, 446–455.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Monahan, J., & Steadman, H. (1994). Violence and mental disorder: Developments in risk assessment. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  50. Monahan, J., Steadman, H., Silver, E., Appelbaum, P., Robbins, P., Mulvey, E., Roth, L., Grisso, T., & Banks, S. (2001). Rethinking risk assessment: The MacArthur study of mental disorder and violence. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  51. Moretti, M. M., Holland, R., & McKay, S. (2001). Self-other representations and relational and overt aggression in adolescent girls and boys. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 19, 109–126.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Moretti, M. M., & Odgers, C. L. (2002). Aggressive and violent girls: Prevalence, profiles and contributing factors. In R. R. Corrado, R. Roesch, S. D. Hart, & J. Gierowski (Eds. ), Multi-problem violent youth: A foundation for comparative research on needs, interventions and outcomes (pp. 302–329). Amsterdam: IOS Press.Google Scholar
  53. Nicholls, T. L., Hemphill, J. F., Boer, D. A., Kropp, P. R., & Zapf, P., (2001). Offenders: Assessment and treatment in special populations. In R. Schuller & J. R. P. Ogloff (Eds. ), Introduction to psychology and law: Canadian perspectives. (pp. 248–282). Toronto, ON: Uni-versity of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
  54. Nicholls, T. L., Logan, C, Webster, C. D., & Ogloff, J. R. P. (2003, April) Assessing violence risk in women: A review and critique. Society for Research on Child Development Annual Meetings. Tampa, FL.Google Scholar
  55. Odgers, C. L., & Busch, J. (2003, April). The impact of physical and sexual victimization on violent behavior in adolescence: A meta-analytic approach. Society for Research on Child Development Annual Meetings. Tampa, FL.Google Scholar
  56. Odgers, C. L., & Moretti, M. M. (2002). Aggressive and antisocial girls: Research update and future challenges. International journal of Forensic and Mental Health, 2, 17–33.Google Scholar
  57. Odgers, C. L., Moretti, M. M., & Pepler, D. J. (2003, April). Antisocial and aggressive behavior in girls: Are we measuring the same construct? International Association of Forensic Mental Health Services. Miami, FL.Google Scholar
  58. Odgers, C. L., & Reppucci, N. D. (2002, May). Female young offenders: A meta-analytic approach. Paper presented at the Vancouver Conference on Aggressive and Violent Girls: Contributing Factors and Intervention Strategies, Vancouver, Canada.Google Scholar
  59. Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention. (1995). Guide for implementing the comprehensive strategy for serious, violent, and chronic juvenile offenders. Washington, D. C. : Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention, Department of Justice.Google Scholar
  60. Otto, R. (2000). Assessing and managing violence risk in outpatient settings. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 56, 1239–1262.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Paquette, J. A., & Underwood, M. K. (1999). Gender differences in young adolescents’ experiences of peer victimization: Social and physical aggression. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 45, 242–266.Google Scholar
  62. Pepler, D. J., & Sedighdeilami, F. (1998). Aggressive girls in Canada. Ottawa: Applied Research Branch, Strategic Policy Human Resources Development Canada.Google Scholar
  63. Puzzanchera, C., Stahl, A. L., Finnegan, T. A., Tierney, N., & Snyder, H. N. (2003). juvenile Court Statistics 1998. Washington, DC: Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention.Google Scholar
  64. Reitsma-Street, M. (1999). Justice for Canadian girls: A 1990s update. Canadian Journal of Criminology, 41, 335–364.Google Scholar
  65. Rivera, B., & Spatz Widom, C. (1990). Childhood victimization and violent offending. Violence & Victims, 5, 19–35.Google Scholar
  66. Robins, L. N. (1986). The consequence of conduct disorder in girls. In D. Olweus, J. Block, & M. Radke-Yarrow (Eds. ), Development of antisocial and prosocial behavior (pp. 385–414). New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.Google Scholar
  67. Rosenbaum, J. L. (1989). Family dysfunction and female delinquency. Crime & Delinquency, 35, 31–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Rowe, D., Vazsonyi, A., & Flannery, D. (1995). Sex differences: Do means and within-sex variation have similar causes? Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 32, 84–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Rutherford, M. J., Alterman, A. I., & Cacciola, J. S. (1995). Reliability and validity of the Revised-Psychopathy Checklist in opiate and cocaine addicted women. Issues in Criminological and Legal Psychology, 24, 136–141.Google Scholar
  70. Salekin, R., Rogers, R., & Sewell, K. (1998). Psychopathy and recidivism among female inmates. Law and Human Behavior, 22, 109–128.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Seagrave, D., & Grisso, T. (2002). Adolescent development and the measurement of juvenile psychopathy. Law and Human Behavior, 26, 219–239.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Shaw, M., & Dubois, S. (1995). Understanding violence by women: A review of the literature. Ottawa: Correctional Service of Canada.Google Scholar
  73. Simourd, L., & Andrews, D. A. (1994). Correlates of delinquency: A look at the gender differences. Women in Prison, 6, 28–44.Google Scholar
  74. Sommers, I., & Baskin, D. (1994). Factors related to female adolescent initiation into violent street crime. Youth and Society, 25, 468–489.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Sroufe, L. A. (1990). Considering normal and abnormal together: The essence of developmental psychopathology. Development and Psychopathology, 2, 335–347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Straus, M., & Gelles, R. J. (1986). Societal change and change in family violence from 1975 to 1985 as revealed by two national surveys. Journal of Marriage & the Family, 48, 465–479.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Tarasoff v. the Regents of the University of California, et al, 551 P. 2d 334 (Cal. 1976).Google Scholar
  78. Teplin, L. A. (2003, April). Psychiatric disorders in detained youth: Implication for treatment and public health policy. Plenary address at the 3rd annual International Association of Forensic Mental Health Services conference, Miami, FL.Google Scholar
  79. Statistics Canada. (2001). Canadian dimensions: Youth and adult crime rates. Online. Available: http://www. statcan/english/Pgdb/State/Justice/legal.Google Scholar
  80. Totten, M. (2000). The special needs of females in Canada’s youth justice system: An account of some young women’s experiences and views. Ottawa: Department of Justice Canada.Google Scholar
  81. Uggen C., & Kruttschnitt C. (1998). Crime in the breaking: Gender differences in desistance. Law & Society Review, 32, 339–366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. U. S. Bureau of Justice Statistics. (1997). Privacy and juvenile justice records: A mid-decade status report. Annapolis Junction, MD: Bureau of Justice.Google Scholar
  83. Viale-Val, G., & Sylvester, C. (1993). Female delinquency. In M. Sugar (Ed. ), Female adolescent development (pp. 169–191). New York: Brunner-Mazel.Google Scholar
  84. Vincent, G. M. (2002). Investigating the legitimacy of adolescent psychopathy assessment: Contributions of item response theory. Unpublished dissertation, Simon Fraser University.Google Scholar
  85. Vincent, G. M., & Hart, S. (2002). Psychopathy and youth. In R. R. Corrado, R. Roesch, S. D. Hart, & J. Gierowski (Eds. ), Multi-problem violent youth: A foundation for comparative research on needs, interventions and outcomes (pp. 302–329). Amsterdam: IOS Press.Google Scholar
  86. Vitale, J. E., & Newman, J. P. (2001). Using the Psychopathy Checklist-Revised with female samples: Reliability, validity, and implications for clinical utility. Clinical Psychology: Science & Practice, 8, 117–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Webster, C. D, Douglas, K. S., Eaves, D., & Hart, S. D. (1997). HCR-20 assessing risk for violence: Version 2. Burnaby, British Columbia: Mental Health, Law, and Policy Institute, Simon Fraser University.Google Scholar
  88. Zahn-Waxler, C, Cole, P. M., & Barrett, K. C. (1991). Guilt and empathy: Sex differences and implications for the development of depression. In J. Garber & K. A. Dodge (Eds. ), The development of emotion regulation and dysregulation (pp. 243–272). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Zoccolillo M., & Rogers K. (1991). Characteristics and outcome of conduct disorder in hospitalized adolescent girls. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 30, 973–981.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Candice L. Odgers
    • 1
  • Melinda G. Schmidt
    • 1
  • Dickon Reppucci
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyUniversity of VirginiaCharlottesvilleUSA

Personalised recommendations