Abstract
As therapists, our tools are our discursive performance. But, how do we know what our actions accomplish? When we talk about such practices as collaboration, co-construction, transparency, and gender and cultural equality, how are these constructs performed, and what consequences are achieved? While one’s goal for integrity of ideology and practice may be sincere, we need to reflect upon the following question: “How does our ‘talk about the talk’ of therapy match our discursive performances achieved in session?” In this chapter we will present some ideas about discursive approaches to clinical research. Several analytical methods will be presented that can be used to consider how talk manages, maintains, creates, and challenges the construction of identity and social interaction, and key differences and tensions between these discursive methods will be highlighted. In particular, we note how these methodological tensions are similar to tensions between various discursive therapy approaches, and reflect epistemological choices made by researchers and practitioners. Finally, implications of discursive research for practitioners, supervisors/educators, and researchers, as well as potential concerns involved with this type of research are also provided.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Bhaskar, R. (1978). A realist theory of science London: Harvester Press.
Billig, M. (1999a). Whose terms? Whose ordinariness? Rhetoric and ideology in conversation analysis. Discourse and Society, 10(4), 543–558.
Billig, M. (1999b). Conversation analysis and claims of naiveté. Discourse and Society, 10(4), 572–577.
Bograd, M. (1988). Scapegoating mothers in family therapy: Re-exploring enmeshment. In M. Mirkin (Ed.)-The social andpoliücal contexts of family therapy (pp. 69–87). New York: Gardner Press.
Cobb, S. (1994). “Theories of responsibility.” The social construction of intentions in mediation. Discourse Processes, 18, 165–186.
Crotty, M. (1998). The foundations of social research. London: Sage.
Day, J.M. & Tappan, M.B. (1996). The narrative approach to moral development: From epistemic subject to dialogical selves. Human Development, 39, 67–82.
deShazer, S. (1991). Putting difference to work. New York: WW Norton.
Edley, N. & Wetherell, M. (2001). Jekyll and Hyde: Men’s constructions of feminism and feminists. Feminism & Psychology, 11, 439–457.
Edwards, D. & Potter, J. (1992). Discursive Psychology. London: Sage.
Ewick, P & Silby, S.S. (1995). Subversive stories and hegemonic tales: Toward a sociology of narrative. Law and Society, 29, 197–226.
Foucault, M. (1980). The history of sexuality, Vol. 1: An introduction (R. Hurley, Trans.). New York: Vintage/Random House.
Gale, J. (1991a). The use of self in qualitative research. Qualitative Family Research Newsletter. 5, 1, 3–4.
Gale, J. (1991b). Conversation analysis of therapeutic discourse: Pursuit of an agenda. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
Gale, J.E. (1996). Conversation analysis: Studying the construction of therapeutic realities. In D. Sprenkle and S. Moon (Eds.), Family therapy research: A handbook of methods (pp. 107–124). New York: Guilford.
Gale J.E. & Newfield, N. (1992). A conversation analysis of solution-focused marital therapy session. Journal of Marital & Family Therapy, 18, 153–165.
Garfinkel, H. (1967). Studies in ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Garfinkel, H. (2002). Ethnomethodology’s program: Working out Durkheim’s Aphorism. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.
Gee, J.P., Michaels, S., & O’Connor, M.C. (1992). Discourse analysis. In M.D. LeCompte, W L Millroy & J. Preissle (Eds.), The handbook of qualitative research in education (pp. 227–292). San Diego: Academic Press, Inc.
Goolishian, H.A., & Anderson, H. (1992). Strategy and intervention versus nonintervention: A matter of theory. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 18, 5–16.
Griffith, J., & Griffith, M. (1992). Owning one’s epistemological stance in therapy. Dulwich Centre Newsletter, 1, 5–11.
Harré, R. & van Langenhove, L. (1999). Introducing positioning theory. In R. Harré & L. van Langenhove (Eds.), Positioning Theory (pp. 14–31). Oxford: Blackwood.
Hare-Mustin, R. T (1994). Discourses in the mirrored room: A postmodern analysis of therapy. Family Process, 33, 19–35.
Hartsock, N. (1983). The feminist standpoint: Developing the ground for a specifically feminist historical materialism. In S. Harding & M. Hintikka (Eds.). Discovering reality: Feminist perspectives on metaphysics, methodology, and philosophy of science (pp. 283–310). Dordrecht: Reidel.
Heap, J.L. (1990). Applied ethnomethodology: Looking for the local rationality of reading activities. Human Studies, 13, 39–72.
Held, B.S. (1995). Back to reality: A critique of postmodern theory in psychotherapy. New York: WW Norton.
Heritage, J. (1984). Garfinkel and ethnomethodology. Cambridge, England: Polity
Heritage, J., & Greatbatch D. (1991). On the institutional character of institutional talk: The case of news interviews. In D. Boden I & D.H. Zimmerman (Eds.), Talk and social structure: Studies in ethnomethodology and conversation analysis (pp. 93–137). Berkeley: University of California Press
Heritage, J. (1997). Conversation analysis and institutional talk: Analyzing data. In D. Silverman (Ed.). Qualitative research: Theory, method andpractice (pp. 161–182). London: Sage Publications Ltd.
Heritage, J. & Watson, R. (1979). Formulations as conversational objects. In G. Psathas (Ed.), Everyday Language (pp. 123–162). New York: Irvington Press.
Kogan, S.M. & Brown, A.C. (1998). Reading against the lines: Resisting foreclosure in therapy discourse. Family Process, 37, 495–512.
Kogan, S.M. & Gale, J.E. (1997). Decentering therapy: Textual analysis of a narrative therapy session. Family Process, 36, 101–126.
Korobov, N. (2001, September). Reconciling theory with method: From conversation analysis and critical discourse analysis to positioning analysis. Forum: Qualitative Social Research. On line journal: 2(3). www.qualitative-research.net/fqs-eng.htm
Lawless, J. (2001). Exploring the discourse of race, ethnicity, and culture of clinical supervision in marriage and family therapy utilizing conversation analysis (Doctoral dissertation, University of Georgia, 2000). Dissertation Abstracts International, 6, 3372.
Lawless, JJ, Gale, J.E., & Bacigalupe, G. (2001). The discourse of race and culture in family therapy supervision: A conversation analysis. Contemporary Family Therapy, 23, 181–197.
Maynard, D.W & Cayman, S.E. (1991). The diversity of ethnomethodology. Annual Review of Sociology, 17, 385–418.
Miller, G. (1997). Building bridges: The possibility of analytic dialogue between ethnography, conversation analysis and Foucault. In D. Silverman (Ed.), Qualitative Research: Theory, Method and Practice (pp. 24–44). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Peräkylä, A. (1997). Reliability and validity in research based on tapes and transcripts. In D. Silverman (Ed.), Qualitative Research: Theory, Method and Practice (pp. 201–220). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Pollner, M. (1991). Left of ethnomethodology: The rise and decline of radical reflexivity. American Sociological Review, 56, 370–380.
Pomerantz, A. (1986). Extreme case formulations: A way of legitimizing claims. Human Studies, 9, 219–229.
Pomerantz, A. & Fehr, B.J. (1997). Conversation analysis: An approach to the study of social action as sense making practices. In T van Dijk (Ed.), Discourse as Structure and Process: Discourse Studies: A Multidisciplinary Introduction (pp. 64–91). London: Sage.
Potter, J. (1997). Discourse analysis as a way of analysing naturally occurring talk. In D. Silverman (Ed.). Qualitative research: Theory, method andpractice (pp. 144–160). London: Sage.
Potter, J., & Wetherell, M. (1987). Discourse and social psychology:Beyond attitudes and behavior. London: Sage.
Psathas, G. (1995). Conversation analysis: the study of talk-in-interaction. (Vol. 35). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Rogers, M.F. (1992). They all were passing: Agnes, Garfinkel, and company. Gender & Society, 6, 169–191.
Roulston, K., deMarrais, K. & Lewis, J. (Under review). Learning to interview in the social sciences. Qualitative Inquiry.
Sacks, H.(1992). (1964-1968). Lectures on Conversation (Vols. 1-2), G. Jefferson (Ed.). Oxford: Blackwell.
Sacks, H., Schegloff, E.A., & Jefferson, G. (1974). A simplest systematics for the organization of turntaking for conversation. Language, 50, 696–735.
Schegloff, E. (1992). In another context. In A. Duranti and C Goodwin (Eds.), Rethinking Context (pp. 191–228). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Schegloff, E. (1999a). ’schegloff’s tests’ as Billig’s data’: A critical reply. Discourse and Society, 10, 558–572.
Schegloff, E. (1999b). Naiveté versus sophistication or discipline versus self-indulgence: A rejoinder to Billig. Discourse and Society, 10, 577–583.
Shotter, J. (1984). Social accountability and selfhood. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Smith, D.E. (1990). Texts, facts, and femininity: Exploring the relations of ruling. New York: Routledge.
Tapsell, L. (2000). Using applied conversation analysis to teach novice dietitians history taking skills. Human Studies, 23, 281–307.
ten Have, P (1999). Doing Conversation Analysis: A Practical Guide. London: Sage.
van Dijk, T.A. (1997). Discourse as structure and process. London: Sage.
Watson, R. (1997). Ethnomethodology and textual analysis. In D. Silverman (Ed.). Qualitative research: Theory, method and practice (pp. 80–98). London: Sage.
Weingarten, K. (1991). The discourses of intimacy: Adding a social constructionist and feminist view. Family Process, 30, 286–306.
Wetherell, M. (1998). Positioning and interpretive repertoires: Conversation analysis and poststructuralism in dialogue. Discourse & Society, 9, 387–412.
White, M., (1997). Therapeutic Relationship. Narratives of Therapists’ Lives. (pp. 127–147). Adelaide, Australia: Dulwich Centre Publications.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2004 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Gale, J., Lawless, J., Roulston, K. (2004). Discursive Approaches to Clinical Research. In: Strong, T., Paré, D. (eds) Furthering Talk. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-8975-8_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-8975-8_8
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-1-4613-4743-9
Online ISBN: 978-1-4419-8975-8
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive