Skip to main content

Narrating the Difference

  • Chapter
Furthering Talk

Abstract

The long-standing interest I have in the politics of therapy acted as the impetus for the development of therapeutic practices which circumvent the potential for an imposition of meaning within therapeutic conversations. This imposition is particularly relevant where individuals believe in a version of life events even though this version undermines their sense of well-being and sometimes their very existence. In these circumstances we can feel stuck between two positions. These positions are reflected by these two questions (Avis, 1985, p. 36):

  • Do I expose these ideas by presenting an alternative version/explanation for life events? IfI don&t do this will I be supporting the ongoing oppression of these people (clients)?

  • If I do expose these ideas, will people (clients) experience me as another agent of control?

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Avis, J.M. (1985). The politics of functional family therapy: A feminist critique. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 11, 127–138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bateson, G. (1972). Steps to an ecology of mind, New York: Ballantine Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bird, J. (2000). The heart’s narrative. Edge Press, New Zealand

    Google Scholar 

  • Bograd, M. (1988). Emeshment, Fusion or Relatedness? A conceptual analysis in A guide to feminist family therapy, edited by Lois Braverman, Harrington Park Press, pp. 65–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dickerson, Victoria, C. & Zimmermanjeffrey. L. (1996). If problems talked: Narrative therapy in action, the Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Epston, D. (1989). Temper tantrum parties: Saving face, losing face or going off your face. Dulwich Centre Newsletter, Autumn, pp. 12–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Epston, D. & White, M. (1992). Experience, contradiction, narrative and imagination: Selected Papers of David Epston and Michael White 1989-1991, Dulwich Centre Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisch, R., Weakland, J.H. & Segal, L. (1982). The tactics of change: Doing therapy briefly. San Francisco, Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flax, Jane. (1990). ‘Postmodernism and Gender Relations in Feminist Theory’ in Feminism/ Postmodernism edited by Nicholson L.J. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freedman, J. & Combs, G. (1996). Narrative therapy—The social construction of preferred realities, WW Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilligan, C. (1982). In a different voice: Psychological theory and women’s development. Cambridge: Harvard Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldner, V (1985). Feminism and family therapy Family Process, 24, 31–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hare-Mustin, R. (1978). A feminist approach to family therapy. Family Process, 17, 181–94.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hare-Mustin, Rachel, T., Mareck, Jeanne. (June 1988). The meaning of difference, gender theory, postmodernism and psychology, American Psychologist.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffman, L. (1981). Foundations of family therapy. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Monk, G., Winslade, J., Crocket, K., & Epston, D. (1997). Narrative therapy inpractice: The archaeology of hope, Jossey Bass Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, A. (2002). Discerning between structuralist and non-structuralist categories of identity: A training exercise. The International Journal of Narrative Therapy and Community Work, (4).

    Google Scholar 

  • Sampson, E.E. (1989). “The deconstruction of the self” in Texts of Identity, edited by John Shotter and Kenneth J. Gergen. London: Sage Publications Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Selvini Palazzoli, M., Boscolo, L., Cecchin, G., & Prata, G. (1980). Hypothesising-circularity-neutrality: Family Process, 19, 3–12.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Spender, D. (1980). Man made language. Boston: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Unger, Rhoda K. (1989). Sex, gender and epistemology in gender and thought: Psychological perspectives edited by Crawford, M. and Gentry, M. Stringer-Verlog, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watzlawick, P, Weakland, J. & Fisch, R. (1974). Change: Principles of problem formation and problem resolution. New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, Michael. (1988). Theprocess of questioning: A therapy of literary merit? Dulwich Centre Newsletter, Winter.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, Michael. (1988/89). Externalising the problem, Dulwich Centre Newsletter, Summer.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, M. (1989). Selected papers, Dulwich Centre Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, M. (1995). Re-authoringlives: Interviews and essays, Dulwich Centre Publications.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2004 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Bird, J., Cook, C. (2004). Narrating the Difference. In: Strong, T., Paré, D. (eds) Furthering Talk. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-8975-8_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-8975-8_4

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4613-4743-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4419-8975-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics