Skip to main content

Energy Diversity: Options and Stakeholders

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Stakeholders and Scientists

Abstract

Energy, climate, food, and economic development are intertwined at regional, national, and global levels. There are large international disparities in the availability of, and demand for, energy which will be exacerbated in the near future as world population increases and per capita demand grows. The traditional energy chains from fossil fuels to electricity, heat, and transportation are being diversified by increased reliance on renewable energy sources, as well as new technologies in varying stages of development. As fossil fuel reserves dwindle, thereby becoming more costly, and carbon and climate considerations grow, diversification to low carbon renewables becomes more attractive and cost-effective. Layers of stakeholders include owner–investors, workers, consumers, and regulators, each with different stakes in different energy chains. Issues of economic, ecologic and aesthetic consequences, footprint, emissions, and costs challenge stakeholders to agree on energy options. Often overlooked in stakeholder discussions, investors play a powerful role in the invention, design, demonstration, and implementation of new technologies. Often undervalued, workers facing health and safety hazards are stakeholders influencing the design, construction, and operation of energy chains. As energy dispersion (rather than large centralized power plants) becomes more popular or necessary, siting issues will confront larger numbers of neighbor stakeholders. Certain groups like the United Nations and the U.S. Department of Energy are positioned to facilitate stakeholder input on the international and national scale, achieving a diversity of energy chains.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Agterbosch S, Vermeulen W, Glasbergen P (2004) Implementation of wind energy in the Netherlands: the importance of the social-institutional setting. Energy Pol 32:2049–2066

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allison E (2008) Methane hydrates. In: Letcher TM (ed) Future Energy: Improved, Sustainable and Clean Options for our Planet. Elsevier, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Andrews A (2008) Nuclear Fuel Reprocessing: U.S. Policy Development. Congressional Res Service Report RS22542, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  • Balat M (2008) Clean coal. In: Letcher TM (ed) Future Energy: Improved, Sustainable and Clean Options for our Planet. Elsevier, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Berman DM, O’Connor JT (1996) Who Owns the Sun? People, Politics and the Struggle for a Solar Economy. Chelsea Green Publ Co, White River Jct

    Google Scholar 

  • Bezdek RH, Wendling RM (2005) Fuel efficiency and the economy. Amer Sci 93:132–139

    Google Scholar 

  • Bockris J (2008) Preface. In: Letcher TM (ed) Future Energy: Improved, Sustainable and Clean Options for our Planet. Elsevier, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradner T (2008) Toshiba continues efforts for Galena nuclear power plant The Alaska Journal of Commerce. Apr 27, 2008. http://www.alaskajournal.com/stories/042708/hom_20080427006.html. Accessed 13 Oct 2010

  • Bratrich C, Truffer B, Jorde K et al (2004) Green Hydropower: a new assessment procedure for river management. River Res & Applic 20:865–882

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Breslow PB, Sailor DJ (2002) Vulnerability of wind power resources to climate change in the continental United States. Renew Energy 27:585–598

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burger J, Clarke J, Gochfeld M (2011) Information needs for siting new, and evaluating current, nuclear facilities: ecology, fate and transport, and human health. Environ Monit Assess 172(1–4):121–134

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chelapati CV, Kennedy RP, Wall IB (1972) Probabilistic assessment of aircraft hazard for nuclear power plants. Nuclear Engin Design 19:33–364

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cornot-Gandolphe S, Appert O, Dickel R et al (2003) The Challenges of Further Cost Reductions for New Supply Options (Pipeline, LNG, GTL). 22ND World Gas Conference (Tokyo 2003), CEDIGAZ, Paris. http://www.cedigaz.org/Fichiers/pdf_papers/challenge of further.pdf. Accessed 10 Oct 2010

  • Cravens G (2007) Power to Save the World: The Truth About Nuclear Energy. A.A. Knopf, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • DOE (2010) Grid 2030 Vision. http://www.oe.energy.gov/smartgrid.html. Accessed 14 Oct 2010

  • DOE-OS (2010) Office of Science-Energy Research. http://www.er.doe.gov/. Accessed 10 Oct 2010

  • Fay JA. 1980. Risks of LNG and PNG. Ann. Review Energy 5:89–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gipe P (2010) Deaths DataBase: Wind-works. http://www.wind-works.org/articles/DeathsDatabase.xls. Accessed 17 Oct 2010

  • Gochfeld M, Mohr S (2007) Protecting Contract Workers: Case Study of the US Department of Energy’s Nuclear and Chemical Waste Management. Am J Pub Health 97:1607–1617

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldenberg J (2007) Ethanol for a Sustainable Energy Future. Science 315:808–810

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodwin ARH (2008) The future of oil and gas fossil fuels. In: Letcher TM (ed) Future Energy: Improved, Sustainable and Clean Options for our Planet. Elsevier, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Gore A (2008) Speech on renewable energy. July 17, 2008. Washington, DC. http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyID=92638501

    Google Scholar 

  • Green S, Kennedy D (2008) Nuclear energy (fission). In: Letcher TM (ed) Future Energy: Improved, Sustainable and Clean Options for our Planet. Elsevier, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenberg M (2009) NIMBY, CLAMP, and the Location of New Nuclear-Related Facilities: U.S. National and 11 Site-Specific Surveys. Risk Anal 29:1242–1254

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenberg MR, Krueckeberg DA (1974) Demographic analysis for nuclear power plant siting: A set of computerized models and a suggestion for improving siting practices. Comp Op Res 1:497–506

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hanjali’c K, De Krol RV, Leki’CA (2008) Sustainable Energy Technologies: Options and Prospects. Springer, Netherland

    Google Scholar 

  • Hardin G (1968) Tragedy of the Commons. Science 162:1243–1248

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Holt M, Andrews A (2010) Nuclear plant security and vulnerabilities. Congressional Research Service Report for Congress.7–5700, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  • Hubbert MK (1956) Nuclear Energy and the Fossil Fuel Drilling and Production Practice, Report. American Petroleum Institute: Shell Development Company. http://www.onepetro.org/mslib/servlet/onepetropreview?id=API-56-007&soc=API&speAppNameCookie=ONEPETRO. Accessed 11 Oct 2010

  • Hvistendahl, M (2007) Coal ash is more radioactive than nuclear waste. Scientific American 12/13/2007. http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=coal-ash-is-more-radioactive-than-nuclear-waste. Accessed 17 Oct 2010

  • IMF (2007) Biofuel demand pushes up food prices. International Monetary Fund. http://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/survey/so/2007/RES1017A.html. Accessed 17 Oct 2010

  • IPCC (2010) Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Chapter 9.2.2 Coal. http://www.ipcc.ch/ipccreports/tar/wg3/index.php?idp=359. Accessed 17 Oct 2010

  • Keeley G (2009) Spain’s wind turbines supply half of the national power grid. The Sunday Times (London). Nov 9, 2009. http://business.timesonline.co.uk/tol/business/industry_sectors/natural_resources/article6910298.ece. Accessed 15 Oct 2010

  • ICBE (2010) Carbon as a commodity. International Carbon Bank and Exchange. http://www.icbe.com/emissions/commodity.asp. Accessed 15 Oct 2010

  • Jardinre CG, Predy G, Mackenzie A (2007) Stakeholder participation I investigating the health impacts from coal-fired power generating stations in Alberta, Canada. J. Risk research 10:693–714

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson JH (2011) Minority Participants in Environmental and Energy Decision Making. In: J Burger (ed) Stakeholders and Scientists. Springer: New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Ley W (1954) Engineers’ Dreams: Great Projects that Could Come True. Viking Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Madlener R, Vögtli S (2008) Diffusion of bioenergy in urban areas: a socio-economic analysis of the Swiss wood-fired cogeneration plant. Biomass Bioenergy 32:815–828

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marshall E (2010) Republicans Charge ‘Impropriety’ in Halting Yucca Mountain Safety Review. Science Insider website. 14 Oct 2010. http://news.sciencemag.org/scienceinsider/2010/10/republicans-charge-impropriety.html. Accessed 21 Oct 2010

  • Metz WD (1978) Energy storage and solar power: an exaggerated problem. Science 200:1471–1473

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Miles EL (1999) The concept of ocean governance: evolution toward the 21st century and the principle of sustainable ocean use. Coast Manag 27:1–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moyer M (2010) Fusion’s false dawn. Sci Am. 302(3):50–57

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • NIOSH (2010) Agriculture Health and Safety http://www.cdc.gov/niosh/topics/agriculture/#agcenters. Accessed 14 Oct 2010

  • Normile D (2008) As food prices rise, U.S. support for agricultural centers wilts. Science 320:303

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • National Research Council (2007) Environmental Impacts of Wind Energy Projects. National Academies Press, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  • NREL (2008) National Renewable Energy Laboratory. U.S. Department of Energy. http://www.nrel.gov/. Accessed 15 Oct 2010

  • OSEIA (2006) Oregon Solar Energy Industries Association. Solar Construction Safety. http://www.coshnetwork.org/sites/default/files/OSEIA_Solar_Safety_12-06.pdf. Accessed 10 Oct 2010

  • Ostrum E (2001) Reformulating the commons. In: Burger J, Ostrum E, Norgaard RB, Policansky D, Goldstein BD, (eds) Protecting the Commons. Island Press, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearce F (2005) Act now before it’s too late. New Sci Feb 12, 185:8–11

    Google Scholar 

  • Plog B, Niland J, Quinlan PJ (2004) Fundamentals of Industrial Hygiene. National Safety Council, 4th edition, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter E, Brower D (1963) The Place No One Knew: Glen Canyon on the Colorado San Francisco: Sierra Club

    Google Scholar 

  • Renner JL (2008) Geothermal energy. In: Letcher TM (ed) Future Energy: Improved, Sustainable and Clean Options for our Planet. Elsevier, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Rifkin J (2003) The Hydrogen Economy: After Oil, Clean Energy From a Fuel-Cell-Driven Global Hydrogen Web. EMagazine.com 14(1) Jan – Feb 2003. http://www.emagazine.com/view/?171. Accessed 13 Oct 2010

  • Roscoe RJ, Steenland K, Halperin WE et al (1989) Lung Cancer Mortality Among Nonsmoking Uranium Miners Exposed to Radon Daughters. J Am Med Ass 262:629–633

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Saito Y (2004) Machines in the ocean: the aesthetics of wind farms. Contemporary Aesthetics vol 2. http://www.contempaesthetics.org/newvolume/pages/article.php?articleID=247. Accessed 14 Oct 2010

  • Salminen J, Steingart D, Kallio T (2008) Fuel cells and batteries. In Letcher TM (ed) Future Energy: Improved, Sustainable and Clean Options for our Planet. Elsevier, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneider SH (2009) Science as a Contact Sport: Inside the Battle to Save the Earth’s Climate. National Geographic, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  • Schipper L, Ketoff AN (1985) The international decline in household oil use. Science 230:1118–1125

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Service RF (2009) Another biofuel drawback: the demand for irrigation. Science 326:516–517

    Google Scholar 

  • Smil V (2010) Energy Transitions: History, Requirements, Prospects. Praeger, Santa Barbara

    Google Scholar 

  • SVTC (2009) Towards a Just and Sustainable Solar Industry. A Silicon Valley Toxics Coalition White Paper. http://www.svtc.org/site/DocServer/Silicon_Valley_Toxics_Coalition_Toward_a_Just_and_Sust.pdf?docID=821. Accessed 14 Oct 2010

  • Tester JW, Drake EM, Driscoll MJ et al (2005) Sustainable Energy: Choosing Among Options. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Tester J, Incropera F (2007) Sustainable Energy- Spring 2007. Massachusetts Institute of Technology: MIT (10.391J OpenCourseWare) License: Creative Commons BY-NC-SA. http://ocw.mit.edu. Accessed 01 Mar 2010

  • United Nations (UN2010) Oceans and Law of the Sea. http://www.un.org/Depts/los/index.html. Accessed 13 Oct 2010

  • United Nations Environmental Programme (UNEP2010) Six Priorities. http://www.unep.org/. Accessed 13 Oct 2010

  • Von Braun J (2008) High and rising food prices: why are they rising, who is affected how are they affected, and what should be done. Internatl Food Policy Research Institute. www.ifpri.org/sites/default/files/publications/20080411jvbfoodprices.pdf. Accessed 20 Oct 2010

  • Wing RD (2008) Smart energy houses of the future – self-supporting in energy and zero emission. In: Letcher TM (ed) Future Energy: Improved, Sustainable and Clean Options for our Planet. Elsevier, New York

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

I have benefited greatly from the discussions with colleagues in the Environmental and Occupational Health Sciences Institute and the Consortium for Risk Evaluation with Stakeholder Participation (CRESP), particularly Joanna Burger, David Kosson, Paul Lioy, Chuck Powers, and Michael Greenberg. Part of this synthesis was funded by the Department of Energy through a grant to CRESP (DE-FC01-06EW07053) and National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences grant (P30ES005022). I very much appreciate Joanna Burger’s patience, advice, and encouragement.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael Gochfeld .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Gochfeld, M. (2011). Energy Diversity: Options and Stakeholders. In: Burger, J. (eds) Stakeholders and Scientists. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-8813-3_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics