Abstract
The new speech-processing strategy, the so called “Continuous Interleaved Sampling” (CIS) strategy, used in cochlear implant subjects is based on a paradigm of stimulation at high rates where 1000-1500 pulses/s (pps) are used on each channel (Wilson et al., 1991; McDermott et al., 1992). Recent psychophysical studies on cochlear implant subjects have demonstrated, with the CIS as compared to previous paradigms of stimulation, an improvement in speech perception (Wilson et al., 1991; McDermott et al., 1992; Pelizzone et al., 1995). However, electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve (AN) at such high rates will affect its responses because of the neurons’ refractory period. Furthermore, prolonged electrical stimulation at high rate might influence neurons’ metabolism, possibly leading to fatigue. Therefore, study on the physiological behavior of the AN when stimulated by cochlear implant at higher rates is important to better understand the speech coding procedure, as well as to provide insight into the safety of such new speech processing strategy. A cochlear implant animal model has been established in the rat (Hall, 1990; Vischer et al., 1994; Zhang et al, 1996), in order to address such issues that might not be conducted routinely in patients.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Hall, R.D. (1990) Estimation of survival spiral ganglion cells in the deaf rat using the electrically evoked auditory brainstem response. Hear. Res. 45, 123–136.
Keithley, E.M. and Feldman, M.L. (1979) Spiral ganglion cell counts in an age-graded series of rat cochleas. J. Comp. Neurol. 188, 429–442.
Leake, P.A., Snyder, R.L., Hradck, G.T. and Rebscher, S.J. (1992) Chronic intracochlear electrical stimulation in neonatally deafened cats: Effects of intensity and stimulating electrode location. Hear. Res. 64, 99–117.
McDermott, H.J., McKay, CM. and Vandali, A.E. (1992) A new portable sound processor for the University of Melbourne/Nucleus Limited multielectrode cochlear implant. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 91, 3367–3391.
Pelizzone, M., Boex-Spano, C, Sigrist, A., Francois, J., Tinembart, J., Degive, C. and Montandon, P. (1995) First field trials with a portable CIS processor for the ineraid multichannel cochlear implant. Acta Otolaryngol. (Stockh) 115, 622–628.
Tykocinski, M., Shepherd, R.K. and Clark, G.M. (1995) Reduction in excitability of the auditory nerve following electrical stimulation at high stimulus rates. Hear. Res. 88, 124–142.
Vischer, M.W., Häusler, R., Rouiller, E.M. (1994) Distribution of Fos-like immunoreactivity in the auditory pathway of the Sprague-Dawley rat elicited by cochlear electrical stimulation. Neurosci. Res. 19, 175–185.
Wilson, B.S., Finley, C.C., Lawson, D.T., Wolford, R.D., Eddington, D.K. and Rabinowitz, W.M. (1991) Better speech recognition with cochlear implants. Nature 352, 236–238.
Zhang, J.S., Haenggeli, CA., Tempini, A., Vischer, M.W., Moret, V. and Rouiller, E.M. (1996) Electrically induced Fos-like immunoreactivity in the auditory pathway of the rat: effects of survival time, duration and intensity of stimulation. Brain Res. Bull. 39, 75–82.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1997 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Zhang, J.S., Vischer, M.W., Haenggeli, C.A., Rouiller, E.M. (1997). Responses of the Auditory Nerve to High Rate Pulsatile Electrical Stimulation. In: Syka, J. (eds) Acoustical Signal Processing in the Central Auditory System. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-8712-9_53
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-8712-9_53
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-1-4613-4673-9
Online ISBN: 978-1-4419-8712-9
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive