Skip to main content

The Social Policy Context of Child Care: Effects on Quality

  • Chapter
  • 612 Accesses

Abstract

Examined effects on the quality of children’s child care environments of (a) the stringency of state child care regulations, (b) voluntary compliance with proposed federal child care standards, and (c) the legal auspice of the center. Quality of care was assessed in 227 child care centers in five metropolitan areas. Centers in states with more stringent child care regulations tended to have better staff-child ratios, staff with more child-related training, and lower staff turnover rates. Similarly, centers that more fully complied with the ratio, group size, and training provisions of a set of proposed federal child care standards had significantly lower staff turnover rates, more age-appropriate classroom activities, less harsh and more sensitive teachers, and more teachers with specialized training. For-profit centers offered children less optimal care than did nonprofit centers. These findings are placed in the context of ecological models of research and of contemporary policy debates about child care.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Anderson, C. W., Nagle, R. J, Roberts, W. A., & Smith, J. W. (1981). Attachment to substitute caregivers as a function of center quality and caregiver involvement. Child Development, 52, 53–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). The ecology of human development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke-Stewart, K. A. & Fein, G. (1983). Early childhood programs. In M. Haith & J. Campos (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology: Vol. II. Infancy and developmental psychobiology (pp. 917–1000). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coelen, C, Glantz, E, & Calore, D. (1979). Day care centers in the U.S.: A national profile, 1976-1977. Cambridge, MA: Abt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Culkin, M., Morris, J. R., & Helburn, S. W. (1991). Quality and the true cost of child care. Journal of Social Issues, 47, 71–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cummings, E. M. (1980). Caregiver stability and day care. Developmental Psychology, 16, 31–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Estes, C. L. & Alford, R. R. (1990). Systemic crisis and the nonprofit sector: Toward a political economy of the nonprofit and social services sector. Theory and Society, 19, 173–198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grotberg, E. (1980). The roles of the federal government in regulation and maintenance of quality in child care. In S. Kilmer (Ed.), Advances in early education and day care (Vol. 1, pp. 19–45). Greenwich, CT: JAI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansmann, H. B. (1980). The role of nonprofit enterprise. Yale Law School Journal, 189, 835–901.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harms, T & Clifford, R. M. (1980). The Early Childhood Environment Rating Scale. New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harms, T., Cryer, D., & Clifford, R. M. (1986). Infant-Toddler Environment Rating Scale. Unpublished document, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayes, C., Palmer, J., & Zaslow, M. (1990). Who cares for America’s children? Child Care policy for the 1990s. Report of the Panel on Child Care Policy, Committee on Child Development Research and Public Policy, National Research Council. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howes, C. (1988). Relations between early child care and schooling. Developmental Psychology, 24, 53–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howes, C. Phillips, D., & Whitebook, M. (1992). Thresholds of Quality: Implications for the social development of children in child care. Child Development, 63, 449–460.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Howes, C. & Rubenstein, J. (1985). Determinants of toddlers’ experiences in daycare: Age of entry and quality of setting. Child Care Quarterly, 14, 140–151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howes, C. & Stewart, P. (1987). Child’s play with adults toys, and peers: An examination of family and child care influences. Developmental Psychology, 23, 423–430.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hyson, M. (1982). Playing with kids all day: Job stress in early childhood education. Washington, DC: Acropol.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jorde-Bloom, P. (1988, April). Professional orientation and structural components of early childhood programs: A social-ecological perspective. Paper presented at the annual meetings of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kagan, S. L. (1991). Examining profit and nonprofit child care: An odyssey of quality and auspices. Journal of Social Issues, 47, 87–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kagan, S. L. & Newton, J. W. (1989). For-profit and nonprofit child care: Similarities and differences. Young Children, 45, 4–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahn, A. J. & Kamerman, S. B. (1987). Child care: Facing the hard choices. Dover, MA: Auburn House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keyserling, M. D. (1972). Windows on day care: A report based on findings of the National Council of Jewish Women. New York: National Council of Jewish Women.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kontos, S. & Stremmel, A. (1988). Caregivers& perceptions of working conditions in a child care environment. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 3, 77–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lehrman, K. & Pace, J. (1985). Day care regulation: Serving children or bureaucrats? Policy Analysis, 59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, R. & Krashinsky, M. (1973). Two major issues of public policy: Public subsidy and organization of supply. In D. R. Young & R. Nelson (Eds.), Public policy for day care of young children. Lexington, MA: Heath.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orton, R. D. & Langham, B. (1980). What is government’s role in quality day care? In S. Kilmer (Ed.), Advances in early education and day care (Vol. 1, pp. 47–62). Greenwich, CT: JAI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pattison, R. V. & Katz, H. M. (1983). Investor-owned and not-for-profit hospitals: A comparison based ori California data. New England Journal of Medicine, 309, 347–353.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, D. & Howes, C. (1987). Indicators of quality in child care: Review of the research. In D. A. Phillips (Ed.), Quality in child care: What does research tell us? (Research Monograph of the National Association for the Education of Young Children, Vol. 1). Washington, DC: National Association for the Education of Young Children.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, D., Howes, C., & Whitebook, M. (1991). Child care as an adult work environment. Journal of Social Issues, 47, 49–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, D., Lande, J., & Goldberg, M. (1990). The state of child care regulation: A comparative analysis. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 5, 151–179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, D., McCartney, K., & Scarr, S. (1987). Child care quality and children’s social development. Developmental Psychology, 23, 537–543.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, D., Ricciuti, A., Kiernan, M., Howes, C, & Whitebook, M. The effects of regulatory quality and center auspice on children. Unpublished manuscript.

    Google Scholar 

  • Powell, D. R. (1987). Day care as a family support system. In S. L. Kagan, D. R. Powell, B. Weissbourd, & E. Zigler (Eds.), America’s family support programs: Perspectives and prospects (pp. 115–132). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Price, R. (1989). Bearing witness. American Journal of Community Psychology, 17, 151–167.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rappaport, J. (1981). In praise of paradox: A social policy of empowerment over prevention. American Journal of Community Psychology, 9, 1–26.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Reppucci, N. D. (1985). Psychology in the public interest. In A. M. Rogers & C. J. Scheirer (Eds.), The G. Stanley Hall Lecture Series (Vol. 5, pp. 125–156). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruopp, R., Travers, J., Glantz, E, & Coelen, C. (1979). Children at the center: Final results of the National Day Care Study. Boston: Abt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seidman, E. (1987). Toward a framework for primary prevention research. In J. Steinberg and M. Silverman (Eds.), Preventing mental disorders: A research perspective. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seidman, E. (1988). Back to the future. Community Psychology: Unfolding a theory of social intervention. American Journal of Community Psychology, 16, 3–24.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sibley, A. & Abbott-Shim, M. (1988). Assessment profile for early childhood programs. Atlanta, GA: Quality Assist, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simons, L. S. (1989). Privatization and the mental health system. American Psychologist, 44, 1138–1141.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Vandell, D. & Powers C. (1983). Day care quality and children’s free play activities. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 53, 293–300.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitebook, M., Howes, C, Friedman, J., & Darrah, R. (1982). Caring for caregivers: Burnout in child care. In L. Katz (Ed.), Current topics in early childhood education (Vol. 4). New York: Ablex.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitebook, M., Howes, C, & Phillips, D. (1990). Who cares? Child care teachers and the quality of care in America (Final Report of the National Child Care Staffing Study). Oakland, CA: Child Care Employee Project.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zaslow, M. J. (1991). Variation in child care quality and its implications for children. Journal of Social Issues, 47, 125–138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2002 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Phillips, D.A., Howes, C., Whitebook, M. (2002). The Social Policy Context of Child Care: Effects on Quality. In: Revenson, T.A., et al. A Quarter Century of Community Psychology. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-8646-7_18

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-8646-7_18

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-306-46730-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4419-8646-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics