Abstract
Ecosystems are complex and dynamic; often, they support many diverse and competing demands. (1996) states that “in simple terms, the ecosystem concept states that the earth operates as a series of interrelated systems within which all components are linked, so that a change in any one component may bring about some corresponding changes in other components and in the operation of the whole system.” Managing ecosystems requires that we look at numerous phenomena and deal with information and analyses at multiple scales, whether geographic or temporal. The human dimension also must not be neglected. Effective management of ecosystems requires access to current and consistent geospatial information that can be shared by resource managers and the public. Geospatial information describing our land and natural resources comes from many sources and is most effective when stored in a geospatial database and used in a geographic information system (GIS). Information on the location and condition of current vegetation patterns is one of the key elements in ecosystem management. Remotely sensed data are primary sources for mapping vegetation. Furthermore, comparing images acquired several days, or several years, apart can assist in determining changes over time.
Keywords
- Geographic Information System
- Remote Sensing
- Advance Very High Resolution Radiometer
- Advance Very High Resolution Radiometer
- Ecosystem Management
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Achard, F.; Estreguil, C. 1995. Forest classification of Southeast Asia using NOAA AVHRR data. Remote Sens. Environ.54(3): 198–208.
Agee, J. K.; Johnson, D. R. 1988. Introduction to ecosystem management. In: Agee, J. K.; Johnson, D. R., eds. Ecosystem management for parks and wilderness. Seattle: University of Washington Press: 3–14.
Atkinson, P. M.; Curran, P. J. 1997. Choosing an appropriate spatial resolution for remote sensing investigation. Photogramm. Eng. Remote Sensing63(12): 1345–1351.
Avers, P. E.; Cleland, D. T.; McNab, W. H.; Jensen, M. E.; Bailey, R. G.; King, T.; Goudey, C. B. 1993. National hierarchical framework of ecological units. Washington DC: U.S. Dept. Agric., For. Serv.
Avery, T. E.; Berlin, G. L. 1992. Fundamentals of remote sensing and airphoto interpretation, 5th ed. Minneapolis, MN: Burgess Publishing Co.
Bailey, R. G. 1996. Ecosystem geography. New York: Springer-Verlag.
Bobbe, T.; McKean, J. 1995. Evaluation of a digital camera system for natural resource management. Earth Observation Magazine:45–48.
Bobbe, T.; Reed, D.; Schramek, J. 1993. Georeferenced airborne video imagery. J. For.91(8):34–37.
Boudreau, S. L.; Maus, P. A. 1996. An ecological approach to assess vegetation change after large scale fires on the Payette National Forest. In: Greer, J. D., ed. Proceedings of the sixth biennial Forest Service Conference on remote sensing. Denver, CO: Amer. Soc. Photogramm. Remote Sensing: 330–339.
Brand, D. G. 2001. Criteria and indicators for the conservation and sustainable management of forests: progress to date and future directions. New Zealand J. For. An online version of the paper is located at: http://www.forest.nsw.gov.au/sfm/JCIPAPE.html.
Campbell, J. B. 1996. Introduction to remote sensing, 2nd ed. New York: Guilford Press.
Cohen, W. B.; Spies, T. A. 1992. Estimating structural attributes of Douglas-fir/western hemlock forest stands from Landsat and SPOT imagery. Remote Sens. Environ.41(1): 1–17.
Collins, J. B.; Woodcock, C. E. 1997. An assessment of several linear change detection techniques for mapping forest mortality using multitemporal Landsat TM data. Remote Sens. Environ.56(l):66–77.
Congalton, R.; Green, K. 1998. Assessing the accuracy of remotely sensed data, principles and practices. Boca Raton, FL: Lewis Publishers.
Congalton, R.; Green, K.; Teply, J. 1993. Mapping old growth forests on national forest and park lands in the Pacific Northwest from remotely sensed data. Photogramm. Eng. Remote Sensing59(4):529–535.
Cristofani, A. 1996. The earth in balance-maintaining Brazil’s biodiversity. GPS World7(6):20–30.
Edwards, T. C.; Moisen, G. G.; Cutler, D. R. 1998. Assessing map accuracy in a remotely sensed, ecoregion-scale cover map. Remote Sens. Environ.63(l):73–83.
Federal Geographic Data Committee. 1997a. Content Standard for digital geospatial data. Washington, DC: The Committee.
Federal Geographic Data Committee. 1997b. National vegetation classification system. FGDC-STD-OO5. Reston, VA: The Committee.
Flood, M.; Gutelius, B. 1997. Commercial implications of topographie terrain mapping using scanning airborne laser radar. Photogramm. Eng. Remote Sensing 63(4):327–329, 363-366.
French, W. D., publisher. 1997. Photogramm. Eng. Remote Sensing 63(7).
GIS Core Data Team. 1997. Recommended core data Standards for GIS application, report to the Ecosystem Management Corporate Team and Inter-Regional Ecosystem Management Coordinating Group. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest-Service.
Grumbine, R. E. 1994. What is ecosystem management? Conserv. Biol.8:27–39.
Hardwick, P.; Lachowski, H.; Griffith, R.; Parsons, A. 1998. Burned area emergency rehabilitation project: an example of successful technology transfer. In: Greer, J. D., ed. Proceedings of the seventh biennial Forest Service conference on remote sensing. Nassau Bay, TX: Amer. Soc. Photogramm. Remote Sensing: 62–71.
Hoffer, R.; Maxwell, S.; Ochis, H. 1995. Use of radar for forestry applications. Internal report. Salt Lake City, UT: U.S. Dept. Agric., For. Serv., Remote Sensing Applications Center.
Imhoff, M. L.; Sisk, T. D.; Milne, A.; Morgan, G.; Orr, T. 1997. Remotely sensed indicators of habitat heterogeneity: use of synthetic aperture radar in mapping vegetation structure and bird habitat. Remote Sens. Environ. 60(3):217–227.
Jensen, J.R. 1996. Introductory digital image processing. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Kasischke, E. S.; French, N. H. F. 1995. Locating and estimating the areal extent of wildfires in Alaska Boreal forests using multiple-season AVHRR NDVI composite data. Remote Sens. Environ.51(2):263–275.
Kasischke, E. S.; Melack, J. M.; Dobson, M. C. 1997. The use of imaging radars for ecological assessments. Remote Sens. Environ.59(2): 141–156.
King, D. J. 1995. Airborne multispectral digital camera and video sensors: a critical review of system designs and applications. Can. J. Remote Sensing21(3):245–273.
Knapp, K. A.; Disperati, A.; Sheng, Z. J. 1998. Evaluation and integration of a digital camera system into forest health protection programs in the Western United States, Southern Brazil, and Anhui Province, China. In: Greer, J. D., ed. Proceedings of the seventh biennial Forest Service conference on remote sensing. Nassau Bay, TX: Amer. Soc. Photogramm. Remote Sensing: 257–268.
Lachowski, H.; Wirth, T.; Maus, P.; Powell, J.; Suzuki, K.; McNamara, J.; Riordan, P.; Brahman, R. 1996. Monitoring aspen decline using remote sensing and GIS, Gravelly Mountain landscape, Montana. Internal Project Report. Salt Lake City, UT: U.S. Dept. Agric., For. Serv. Remote Sensing Applications Center.
Lachowski, H.; Hardwick, P.; Griffith, R.; Parsons, A.; Warbington, R. 1997. Faster, better data for burned watersheds needing emergency rehab. J. For. 95(6): 4–8.
Lambin, E. F. 1996. Change detection at multiple temporal scales: seasonal and annual variations in landscape variables. Photogramm. Eng. Remote Sensing 62(8):931–938.
Lefsky, M. A.; Harding, D.; Cohen, W. B.; Parker, G.; Shugurt, H. H. 1999. Surface lidar remote sensing of basal area and biomass in deciduous forests of eastern Maryland, USA. Remote Sens. Environ.67(l):83–98.
Lillesand, T. M.; Kiefer. R. W. 1994. Remote sensing and image interpretation, 3rd ed. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
Loveland, T. R.; Shaw, D. M. 1996. Multiresolution landscape characterization: building collaborative partnerships. In: Scott, J. M.; Tear, T. H.; Davis, F. W., eds. Gap analysis: a landscape approach to biodiversity planning. Bethesda, MD: Amer. Soc. Photogramm. Remote Sensing: 83–89.
Lunetta, R.; Lyon, J. G.; Guindon, B.; Elvidge, C. D. 1998. North American landscape characterization dataset development and data fusion issues. Photogramm. Eng. Remote Sensing 64(8):821–829.
Lyon, J. G.; Yuan, D.; Lunetta, R. S.; Elvidge, C. D. 1998. A change detection experiment using vegetation indices. Photogramm. Eng. Remote Sensing64(2): 143–150.
Malone, C. R. 1998. The federal ecosystem management initiative in the United States. In: Lemons, J.; Good-land, R.; Westra, L., eds. Environmental stability: case studies on the prospects of science and ethics. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Means, J. E.; Acker, S. A.; Harding, D. J.; Blair, J. B.; Lefsky, M. A.; Cohen, W. B.; Harmon, M. E.; McKee, W. A. 1999. Use of large-footprint scanning airborne lidar to estimate forest stand characteristics in the western Cascades of Oregon. Remote Sens. Environ. 67(3):298–308.
Michener, W. K.; Houhoulis, P. F. 1997. Detection of vegetation changes associated with extensive flooding in a forested ecosystem. Photogramm. Eng. Remote Sensing 63(12):1363–1374.
Montreal Process Working Group. 1994. Montreal Process Working Group[on line]. Available: (http://www.dpie, gov.au/agfor/forests/montreal/international.html).
Muchoney, D. M.; Haack, B. N. 1994. Change detection for monitoring forest defoliation. Photogramm. Eng. Remote Sensing 60(10):1243–1251.
Nelson, R. F. 1983. Detecting forest canopy change due to insect activity using Landsat MSS. Photogramm. Eng. Remote Sensing 49(9):1303–1314.
Powell, D. S.; Faulkner, J. L.; Darr, D. R.; Zhu, Z.; Mac-Cleery, D. W. 1993. Forest resources of the United States, 1992. Gen. Tech. Rep. RM-234. Fort Collins, CO: U.S. Dept. Agric., For. Serv., Rocky Mt. For. Range Exp. Sta.
Pozo, D.; Olmo, F. J.; Alados-Arboledas, L. 1997. Fire detection and growth monitoring using a multitemporal technique on AVHRR mid-infrared and thermal channels. Remote Sens. Environ.60(2): 11–120.
Ramsey, R. D.; Falconer, A.; Jensen, J. R. 1995. The relationship between NOAA-AVHRR NDVI and ecoregions in Utah. Remote Sens. Environ.53(3):188–198.
Rosenfeld, C. L.; Thatcher, T. 1994. On the move: GPS monitors Alaska’s Surging Bering Glacier. GPS World 5(11):18–24.
Slaymaker, D. M.; Jones, K. M. L.; Griffin, C. R.; Finn, J. T. 1996. Mapping deciduous forests in southern New England using aerial videography and hyperclustered multi-temporal Landsat TM imagery. In: Scott, J. M.; Tear, T. H.; Davis, F. W., eds. Gap analysis: a landscape approach to biodiversity planning. Bethesda, MD: Amer. Soc. Photogramm. Remote Sensing: 87–101.
Stehman, S. V.; Czaplewski, R. L. 1998. Design and analysis for thematic map accuracy assessment: fundamental principles. Remote Sens. Environ.64(3): 331–344.
Stoms, D.; Davis, F.; Cogan, C.; Cassidy, K. 1994. Assessing land cover map accuracy for GAP analysis [on line]. Available: (http://www.gap.uidaho.edu/gap/ Publications/Publications.htm).
Thomas, J. W. 1999. Guiding principles and workshop overviews. In: Sexton, W.T.; Szaro, R.C.; Johnson, N.; Malk, A.J., eds. Ecological Stewardship: A Common Reference for Ecosystem Management. Oxford, UK: Elsevier Science.
USDA Forest Service. 1995. Burned area emergency rehabilitation handbook.GPO FSH 2509.13. Washington DC: Govt. Print. Off.
USDA Forest Service Regional Ecology Group. 1981. CALVEG: a classification of California vegetation. San Francisco: U.S. Dept. Agric., For. Serv., Region Five.
USDA Forest Service Remote Sensing Advisory Team. 1998. Implementation of remote sensing for ecosystem management. Salt Lake City, UT: U.S. Dept. Agric., For. Serv., Remote Sensing Applications Center.
Varner, V.; Lachowski, H.; Lake, L.; Anderson, B. 1998. Mapping and monitoring noxious weeds using remote sensing. In: Greer, J. D., ed. Proceedings of the seventh biennial Forest Service conference on remote sensing. Nassau Bay, TX: Amer. Soc. Photogramm. Remote Sensing: 182–193.
Viedma, D.; Melia, J.; Segarra, D.; Garcia-Haro, J. 1997. Modeling rates of ecosystem recovery after fire using Landsat TM data. Remote Sens. Environ.61(3): 383–398.
Wirth, T.; Maus, P.; Lachowski, H.; Taylor, J.; Linquist, E. 1994. Investigative report on digital orthophoto quadrangles using data from the Superior National Forest. Internal report. Salt Lake City, UT: U.S. Dept. Agric., For. Serv., Remote Sensing Applications Center.
Woodcock, C. E.; Strahler, A. H. 1987. The factor of scale in remote sensing. Remote Sens. Environ. 21: 311–332.
Woodcock, C. E.; Collins, J. B.; Gopal, S.; Jakabhazy, V. D.; Li, X.; Macomber, S.; Ryherd, S.; Harward, V. J.; Levitan, J.; Wu, Y.; Warbington, R. 1994. Mapping forest vegetation using Landsat TM imagery and a canopy reflectance model. Remote Sens. Environ.50: 240–254.
Zhu, Z. 1994. Forest density mapping in the lower 48 states: a regression procedure. Research Paper SO-280. New Orleans: U.S. Dept. Agric., For. Serv., Southern For. Exp. Sta.
Zhu, Z.; Evans, D. L. 1994. U.S. forest types and predicted percent forest cover from AVHRR data. Photogramm. Eng. Remote Sensing 60(5):525–531.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2001 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Lachowski, H.M., Johnson, V.C. (2001). Remote Sensing Applied to Ecosystem Management. In: Jensen, M.E., Bourgeron, P.S. (eds) A Guidebook for Integrated Ecological Assessments. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-8620-7_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-8620-7_11
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-0-387-98583-1
Online ISBN: 978-1-4419-8620-7
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive