Skip to main content

Abstract

Ecological assessments are a critical component of land management planning and regulatory decision making. Their scope and nature commonly differ due to the issues addressed; the discipline, agency, or audience involved; and the associated legislative or regulatory requirements (Lessard et al., 1999). In the United States, for example, the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) of 1969 directed that all federal lands be managed to “encourage productive and enjoyable harmony between man and his environment; to promote efforts which will prevent or eliminate damage to the environment and biosphere and stimulate the health and welfare of man; (and) to enrich understanding of the ecological systems and natural resources important to the Nation.” To ensure compliance with these objectives, NEPA dictated that the environmental consequences associated with proposed management of federal lands be fully disclosed to the general public through appropriate ecological assessment documents (e.g., environmental impact assessments). In a similar manner, over 40 other countries have legislated the use of some type of ecological assessment as a prerequisite for effective environmental planning and land management (Robinson, 1992; Treweek, 1999).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Allen, T. F. H.; Starr, T. B. 1982. Hierarchy: perspectives for ecological complexity. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker, W. L. 1992. The landscape ecology of large disturbances in the design and management of nature reserves. Landscape Ecol. 7:181–194.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beek, K. J.; Bannema, J. 1972. Land evaluation for agricultural land use planning—an ecological methodology. Wageningen, The Netherlands: Department of Soil Sciences and Geology, Agricultural University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourgeron, P. S.; Jensen, M. W. 1994. An overview of ecological principles for ecosystem management. In: Jensen, M. E.; Bourgeron, P. S., tech. eds. Volume II: ecosystem management: principles and applications. Gen. Tech. Rep. PNW-GTR-318. Portland, OR: U.S. Dept. Agric, For. Serv., Pacific Northw. Res. Sta.: 45–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourgeron, P. S.; Humphries, H. G; Jensen, M. E.; Brown, B. A. (2001). Integrated regional ecological assessments and land use planning. In: Dale, V.; Haueber, R., eds. Applying ecological principles to land management. New York: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyce, M. S.; Haney, A. 1997. Ecosystem management: applications for sustainable forest and wildlife resources. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christensen, N. L. 1996. The scientific basis for sustainable use of land. In: Diamond, H. L.; Noonan, P., eds. The use of land. Washington, DC: Island Press: 273–308.

    Google Scholar 

  • Costanza, R.; Wainger, L.; Folke, C.; Maler, K. 1993. Modeling complex ecological economic systems. BioScience 43:545–555.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Everett, R.; Hessburg, P.; Jensen, M.; Bormann, B. 1994. Volume 1: executive summary. Gen. Tech. Rep. PNW-GTR-317. Portland, OR: U.S. Dept. Agric., For. Serv., Pacific Northw. Res. Sta.

    Google Scholar 

  • Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO). 1976. A framework for land evaluation. 32. Rome: United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization.

    Google Scholar 

  • Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO). 1993. Guidelines for land use planning. Rome: United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forman, R. T. T.; Godron, M. 1986. Landscape ecology. New York: John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Golley, F. B. 1994. Development of landscape ecology and its relation to environmental management. In: Jensen, M. E.; Bourgeron, P. S., tech. eds. Volume II: ecosystem management: principles and applications. Gen. Tech. Rep. PNW-GTR-318. Portland, OR: U.S. Dept. Agric., For. Serv., Pacific Northw. Res. Sta.: 34–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graham, R. L.; Hunsaker, C. T.; O’Neill, R. V.; Jackson, B. L. 1991. Ecological risk assessment at the regional scale. Ecol. Appl. 1:196–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grumbine, R. E. 1994. What is ecosystem management? Conserv. Biol. 8:27–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haynes, R. W.; Graham, R. T.; Quigley, T.M. 1996. A framework for ecosystem management in the interior Columbia basin and portions of the Klamath and Great Basins. Gen. Tech. Rep. PNW-GTR-374. Portland, OR: U.S. Dept. Agric., For. Serv., Pacific Northw. Res. Sta.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heissenbuttel, A. E. 1995. Industry perspectives on ecosystem management: an evolution in forest science and policy. In: Everett, R. L.; Baumgartner, D. M., eds. Ecosystem management in western interior forests. Pullman, WA: Department of Natural Resource Sciences, Washington State University: 11–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Houing, C. S., editor. 1978. Adaptive environmental assessment and management. London: John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holling, C. S. 1986. The resilience of terrestrial ecosystems: local surprise and global change. In: Clark, W. M.; Munn, R. E., eds. Sustainable development in the biosphere. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press: 292–320.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunsaker, C. T.; Graham, R. T.; Suter II, G. W.; O’Neill, R.V.; Barnthouse, L.W.; Gardner, R. H. 1990. Assessing ecological risk on a regional scale. Environ. Manage. 14:325–332.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hunter, M. 1991. Coping with ignorance: the coarse-filter strategy for maintaining biodiversity. In: Kohn, K.A., ed. Balancing on the brink of extinction—the endangered species act and lessons for the future. Washington, DC: Island Press: 256–281.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, M. E.; Bourgeron, P. S., editors. 1994. Volume II: ecosystem management: principles and applications. Gen. Tech. Rep. PNW-GTR-318. Portland, OR: U.S. Dept. Agric., For. Serv., Pacific Northw. Res. Sta.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, M. E.; Bourgeron, P. S.; Everett, R.; Goodman, I. 1996. Ecosystem management: a landscape ecology perspective. J. Amer. Water Resources Association 32:208–216.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kay, J. J. 1991. A nonequilibrium themodynamic framework for discussing ecosystem integrity. Environ. Manage. 15:483–495.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kessler, J. J., editor. 1997. Strategie environmental analysis, AIDEnvironment. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: The Hague.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klingebiel, A. A.; Montgomery, D. H. 1961. Land capability classification. Agricultural Handbook 210. Washington, DC: Soil Conservation Service, U.S. GPO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lessard, G.; Jensen, M.E.; Crespi, M.; Bourgeron, P.S. 1999. A general framework for integrated ecological assessments. In: Cordel, H. K.; Bergstrom, J. C, eds. Integrating social sciences with ecosystem management: human dimensions in assessment policy and management. Champaign-Urbana, IL: Sagamore: 35–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levin, S. A. 1992. The problem of pattern and scale in ecology. Ecology 73:1942–1968.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marcot, B. G. 1986. Concepts of risk analysis as applied to viable population assessment and planning. In: Wilcox, B. A.; Brassard, P. F.; Marcot, B. G., eds. The management of viable populations: theory, applications and case studies. Standord, CA: Center for Conservation Biology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maxwell, J. R.; Edwards, C. J.; Jensen, M. E.; Paustian, S.J.; Parrott, H.; Hill, D. M. 1995. A hierarchical framework of aquatic ecological units in North America. NC-GTR-176. St. Paul, MN: U.S. Dept. Agric. For. Serv., North Central Exp. Sta.

    Google Scholar 

  • May, R. 1976. Simple mathematical models witery complicated dynamics. Nature 261:459–467.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • National Research Council. 1994. Rangeland health: new methods to classify, inventory, and monitor rangelands. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Naveh, Z.; Lieberman, A. 1984. Landscape ecology: theory and application. New York: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noss, R. F.; Cooperrider, A. Y. 1994. Saving nature’s legacy. Washington, DC: Island Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olson, G. W. 1974. Land classifications. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Neill, R. V.; King, A. W. 1998. Homage to St. Michael; or, why are there so many books on scale? In: Peterson, D. L.; Parker, V. T., eds. Ecological scale: theory and applications. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Neill, R. V.; DeAngelis, D. L.; Waide, J. B.; Allen, T. F. H. 1986. A hierarchical concept of ecosystems. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ortolano, L.; Shepherd, A. 1995. Environmental impact assessment. In: Vanclay, F.; Bronstein, D. A., eds. Environmental and social impact assessment. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons: 3–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, G.; Allen, C. R.; Holling, C. S. 1998. Ecological resilience, biodiversity, and scale. Ecosystems 1:6–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rahel, F. J. 1990. The hierarchical nature of community persistence: a problem of scale. Amer. Naturalist 136:328–344.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, N. 1992. International trends in environmental impact assessment. Boston College Environ. Affairs Law Rev. 19(3):591–621.

    Google Scholar 

  • Samson, F. B.; Knopf, F. L. 1996. Ecosystem management: selected readings. New York: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slocombe, D. S. 1993. Implementing ecosystem-based management: development of theory, practice, and research for planning and managing a region. BioScience 4:612–622.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Therivel, R.; Rosărio Partidărio, M. 1996. The practice of strategic environmental assessment. London: Earthscan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Therivel, R.; Thompson, S. 1996. Strategic environmental assessment and nature conservation. Peterborough, UK: English Nature.

    Google Scholar 

  • Therivel, R.; Wilson, E.; Thompson, S.; Heaney, D.; Pritchard, D. 1992. Strategie environmental assessment. London: Earthscan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Treweek, J. 1999. Ecological impact assessment. Oxford, UK: Blackwell Science.

    Google Scholar 

  • Urban, D. L.; O’Neill, R. V.; Shugart, H. H., Jr. 1987. Landscape ecology: a hierarchical perspective can help scientists understand spatial patterns. BioScience 37:119–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 1992. Framework for ecological risk assessment. EPA/630/R-92/001. Washington, DC: Risk Assessment Forum, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 1998. Guidelines for ecological risk assessment. EPA/630/R-95/002F. Washington, DC: Risk Assessment Forum, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, F. H. 1995. What have we learned? In: Wagner, F. H., ed. Proceedings of the symposium: ecosystem management of natural resources in the Intermountain West, April 20-22, 1994, Logan, Utah. Natural Resources and Environmental Issues, Logan, UT: College of Natural Resources, Utah State University, 5:121–125.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walters, C. 1986. Adaptive management of renewable resources. New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walters, C. J.; Holling, C. S. 1990. Large-scale management experiments and learning by doing. Ecology. 71(6):2060–2068.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilcove, D. S.; Blair, R. B. 1995. The ecosystem management bandwagon. Tree 10:345.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zonneveld, I. S. 1988. Basic principles of land evaluation using vegetation and other land attributes. In: Kuchler, A. W.; Zonneveld, I. S., eds. Vegetation mapping. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers: 499–517.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2001 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Jensen, M.E., Bourgeron, P.S. (2001). Introduction. In: Jensen, M.E., Bourgeron, P.S. (eds) A Guidebook for Integrated Ecological Assessments. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-8620-7_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-8620-7_1

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-387-98583-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4419-8620-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics