Skip to main content

Use of Absorbable Mesh in the Staged Repair of Contaminated Abdominal Wall Defects

  • Chapter
Abdominal Wall Hernias
  • 47 Accesses

Abstract

Virtually every abdominal surgeon has faced the problem of closing a contaminated abdominal defect in which the fascia cannot be easily brought together primarily. Infected fascia may be inadequately debrided in the hope of leaving enough fascia for primary closure without tension, or, as observed by Stone et al, there may be an obsession with obtaining fascia-to-fascia approximation regardless of tension. Usually, however, the surgeon recognizes that closure of an extensively contaminated abdominal defect under tension virtually guarantees a return trip to the operating room to repair a fascial dehiscence. Whatever the circumstances, inadequate debridement of necrotic fascia, or fascia of questionable viability, is a violation of surgical principles.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 259.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Stone HH, Fabian TC, Turkles ML, et al. Management of acute full-thickness losses of the abdominal wall. Ann Surg. 1981; 193:612–617.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Dayton MT, Buchele BA, Shirazi SS, et al. Use of an absorbable mesh to repair contaminated abdominal wall defects. Arch Surg. 1986; 121: 954–960.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Witzel O. Ueber die Verschliessung von Bauchwunden unter Brucht-pforten durch Versenkte Silverdrahtnetze. Cent Chir. 1900; 27:257.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Goepel R. Uber die Verschliessung von Bruchpforten durch einheilung Geflochtener Feriger Silberdrahtnetze. Verh Dtsch Ges Chir. 1900; 29:4.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Usher FC, Wallace SA. Tissue reaction to plastics: a comparison of nylon, Orion, Dacron, Teflon, and Marlex. Arch Surg. 1958; 76:997–999.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Schmitt JH Jr, Grinnan GLB. Use of Marlex mesh in infected abdominal war wound. Am J Surg. 1967; 113:825–828.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Eng K, Casson P, Berman IR, et al. Clostridial myonecrosis of the abdominal wall. Am J Surg. 1973; 125:367–371.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Gilsdorf RB, Shea MM. Repair of massive septic abdominal wall defects with Marlex mesh. Am J Surg. 1975; 130:634–638.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Wouters DB, Krom RAF, Slooff MJH, et al. The use of Marlex mesh in patients with generalized peritonitis and multiple organ system failure. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1983; 156:609–614.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Boyd WC. Use of Marlex mesh in acute loss of the abdominal wall due to infection. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1977; 144:251–252.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Voyles CR, Richardson JD, Bland KI, et al. Emergency abdominal wall reconstruction with polypropylene mesh. Ann Surg. 1981; 194:219–223.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Jones JW, Jurkovich GJ. Polypropylene mesh closure of infected abdominal wounds. Am Surg. 1989; 55:73.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Delaney HM, Porreca F, Mitsudo S, Solanki B, Rudavsky A. Splenic capping: an experimental study of a new technique for splenorrhaphy using woven polyglycolic acid mesh. Ann Surg. 1982; 196:187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Lamb JP, Vitale T, Kaminskin DL. Comparative evaluation of synthetic meshes used for abdominal wall replacement. Surgery 1983; 93:643.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Jenkins SD, Klamer TW, Parteka JJ, et al. A comparison of prosthetic materials used to repair abdominal wall defects. Surgery. 1983; 94:392.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Tyrell J, Silberman H, Chandrasoma P, et al. Absorbable versus permanent mesh in abdominal operations. Surgery. 1989; 168:227–232.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Klinge U, Klosterhalfen B, Conze J, et al. Modified mesh for hernia repair that is adapted to the physiology of the abdominal wall. Eur J Surg. 1998; 164(12):951–960.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Dasika UK, Widmann WD. Does lining polypropylene with polyglactin mesh reduce intraperitoneal adhesions? Am Surg. 1998; 64(9):817–820.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Zieren J, Castenholz E, Baumgart E, et al. Effects of fibrin glue and growth factors released from platelets on abdominal hernia repair with a resorbable PGA mesh: experimental study. J Surg Res. 1999; 85(2): 267–272.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Klinge U, Klosterhalfen B, Muller M, et al. Influence of polyglactin-coating on functional and morphological parameters of polypropylenemesh modifications for abdominal wall repair. Biomaterials. 1999; 20(7):613–623.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Delaney HM, Rudavsky A, Lan S. Preliminary clinical experience with the use of absorbable mesh splenorrhaphy. J Trauma. 1985; 25:909.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Delaney HM, Solanki B, Driscoll WB. Use of absorbable mesh for splenorrhaphy and pelvic peritoneum reconstruction. Contemp Surg. 1985; 27:11.

    Google Scholar 

  23. McGahren ED, Rodgers BM, Waldron PE. Successful management of stage 4S neuroblastoma and severe hepatomegaly using absorbable mesh in an infant. J Pediatr Surg. 1998; 33(10):1554–1557.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Smith PC, Tweddell JS, Bessey PQ. Alternative approaches to abdominal wound closure in severely injured patients with massive visceral edema. J Trauma. 1992; 32(1):16–20.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Buck JR, Fath JJ, Chung SK, et al. Use of absorbable mesh as an aid in abdominal wall closure in the emergent setting. Am Surg. 1995; 61(8):655–658.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Gentile AT, Feliciano PD, Mullins RJ, et al. The utility of polyglycolic acid mesh for abdominal access in patients with necrotizing pancreatitis. J Am Coll Surg. 1998; 186(3):313–318.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Chendrasekhar A. Bedside placement of polyglycolic acid mesh: a novel treatment of uncomplicated abdominal wound dehiscence. W V Med J. 1996; 92(3):136–137.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Fabian TC, Croce MA, Pritchard FE, et al. Planned ventral hernia. Staged management for acute abdominal wall defects. Ann Surg. 1994; 219(6):643–653.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Greens MA, Mullins RJ, Malangoni MA, et al. Laparotomy wound closure with absorbable polyglycolic acid mesh. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1993; 176(3):213–218.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Ramadwar RH, Carachi R, Young DG. Collagen-coated Vicryl mesh is not a suitable material for repair of diaphragmatic defects. J Pediatr Surg. 1997; 32(12):1708–1710.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Carachi R, Audry G, Ranke A, et al. Collagen-coated Vicryl mesh: a new bioprosthesis in pediatric surgical practice. J Pediatr Surg. 1995; 30(9): 1302–1305.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Barie PS, Thompson WA, Mack CA. Planned laparoscopic repair of a spigelian hernia using a composite prosthesis. J Laparoendosc Surg. 1994; 4(5):359–363.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Porter JM. A combination of Vicryl and Marlex mesh: a technique for abdominal wall closure in difficult cases. J Trauma. 1995; 39(6): 1178–1180.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Alponat A, Lakshminarasappa SR, Yavuz N, et al. Prevention of adhesion by Seprafilm, an absorbable adhesion barrier: an incisional hernia model in rats. Am Surg. 1997; 63(9):818–819.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Edlich RF, Panek PH, Rodeheaver GT, et al. Physical and chemical configuration of sutures in the development of surgical infection. Ann Surg. 1997; 177:679–687.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2001 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Dayton, M.T. (2001). Use of Absorbable Mesh in the Staged Repair of Contaminated Abdominal Wall Defects. In: Bendavid, R., Abrahamson, J., Arregui, M.E., Flament, J.B., Phillips, E.H. (eds) Abdominal Wall Hernias. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-8574-3_42

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-8574-3_42

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4612-6440-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4419-8574-3

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics