Abstract

This chapter defines the term affordance, starting from its original use in an ecological context to its use in human-computer interactions (HCI). It then considers how the term can be used to describe the characteristics of technologies, along with illustrative examples. This chapter argues that the concept is valuable in that it accurately describes the ways in which the inherent characteristics of different technologies can be instantiated in different contexts and through the different preferences of individuals and how they interact with technologies. This chapter describes how the term affordances can be used to help develop a better understanding of the characteristics of different technologies and inform design decisions.

Keywords

Harness 

References

  1. Barron, F. (1955). The disposition toward originality. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 51, 478–485.Google Scholar
  2. Blumenfeld, P. C., Soloway, E., Marx, R., Krajcik, J. S., Guzdial, M., & Palincsar, A. (1991). Motivating project-based learning: Sustaining the doing, supporting the learning. Educational Psychologist, 26(3 and 4), 369–398.Google Scholar
  3. Borgeman, C. L., Abelson, H., Dirks, L., Johnson, R., Koedinger, K., Linn, M. C., Lynch, C. A., Oblinger, D. G., Pea, R. D., Salen, K., Smith, M., & Azalay, A. (2008). Fostering learning in the networked world: The cyberlearning opportunity and challenge (Report of the NSF Task Force on Cyberlearning). Available online at http://www.nsf.gov/pubs/2008/nsf08204/nsf08204.pdf. Accessed 7 Oct 2011.
  4. Boyle, T., & Cook, J. (2004). Understanding and using technological affordances: A commentary on Conole and Dyke. ALT-J, 12(3), 295–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Buzzetto-More, N. (Ed.). (2010). The e-portfolio paradigm: Informing, educating, assessing, and managing with e-portfolios. Santa Rosa: Informing Science Press.Google Scholar
  6. Conole, G., & Dyke, M. (2004a). What are the inherent affordances of information and communication technologies? ALT-J, 12(2), 113–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Conole, G., & Dyke, M. (2004b). Response to Boyle and Cook review of affordances paper. ALT-J, 12(3), 301–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Conole, G., Smith, J., & White, S. (2007). A critique of the impact of policy and funding on practice. In G. Conole & M. Oliver (Eds.), Contemporary perspectives in e-learning research: Themes, methods and impact on practice (Part of the Open and distance learning series, F. Lockwood, ed.) London: RoutledgeFalmer.Google Scholar
  9. Conole, G., McAndrew, P., & Dimitriadis, Y. (2010). The role of CSCL pedagogical patterns as mediating artefacts for repurposing open educational resources. In F. Pozzi & P. Donatella (Eds.), Techniques for fostering collaboration in online learning communities: Theoretical and practical perspectives. Hershey: IGI Global. Available online at http://oro.open.ac.uk/23040/. Accessed 11 Aug 2011.
  10. Dewey, J. (1916). Democracy and education. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  11. Dewey, J. (1933). The middle works, 1899–1924, in Boydston, J. edited collection. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press 1976–1983.Google Scholar
  12. Dewey, J. (1938). Experience and education. New York: Collier Books.Google Scholar
  13. Dewey, J. (1949). Experience and existence in Boydston, J. edited collection, John Dewey The later works, 1949–1952 (Vol. 16). Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Dillenbourg, P. (1999). Collaborative-learning: Cognitive and computational approaches. Oxford: Elsevier.Google Scholar
  15. Dyke, M., Conole, G., Ravenscroft, A., & De Freitas, S. (2007). Learning theories and their application to e-learning. In G. Conole & M. Oliver (Eds.), Contemporary perspectives in e-learning research: Theories, methods and impact on practice. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  16. Edelson, D. C., Gordin, D. N., & Pea, R. D. (1999). Addressing the challenges of inquiry-based learning through technology and curriculum design. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 8(3 and 4), 391–450.Google Scholar
  17. Garrison, D. R. (2002, September). Cognitive presence for effective asynchronous online learning: The role of reflective inquiry, self-direction and meta-cognition. Invited paper presented to the Sloan Consortium Asynchronous Learning Network Invitational Workshop, Lake George, NY. Available online at http://oit.hostos.cuny.edu/socialnetwork/effectiveonlinelearning/files/2009/09/Learning-Effectiveness-paper-Garrison.pdf. Accessed 11 Aug 2011.
  18. Gaver, W. W. (1991, April 28–May 2). Technology affordances. CHI’91 Conference Proceedings (pp. 79–84), New Orleans, Louisiana.Google Scholar
  19. Gibson, J. J. (1977). The theory of affordances. In R. Shaw & J. Bransford (Eds.), Perceiving, acting, and knowing (pp. 67–82). Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  20. Gibson, J. J. (1979). The ecological approach to visual perception. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  21. Jafari, A., & Kaufman, C. (2006). Handbook of research on ePortfolios. Hershey: Idea Group Reference.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Jones, C., Cook, J., Jones, A., & De Laat, M. (2007). Collaboration. In G. Conole & M. Oliver (Eds.), Contemporary perspectives in e-learning research. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  23. Kaye, A. R. (Ed.). (1992). Collaborative learning through computer conferencing: The Najdeen papers. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
  24. Kerawalla, L., Minocha, S., Kirchup, G., & Conole, G. (2008). Characterising the different blogging behaviours of students on an online distance learning course. Learning Media and Technology, 33(1), 21–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Lombardi, M. M. (2007). Authentic learning for the 21st century – An overview. Educause Learning Initiative publication. Available online http://net.educause.edu/ir/library/pdf/ELI3009.pdf. Accessed 11 Aug 2011.
  26. Lyons, N. (Ed.). (2010). Handbook of reflection and reflective inquiry: Mapping a way of knowing for professional reflective inquiry. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  27. Mason, R., & Kaye, A. (1989). Mindweave: Communication, computers and distance education. Oxford: Pergamon.Google Scholar
  28. McGrenere, J., & Ho, W. (2000, May). Affordances: Clarifying and evolving a concept. In Proceedings of Graphics Interface. Available online at: http://www.dgp.utoronto.ca/∼joanna/papers/gi_2000_affordances.pdf. Accessed 11 Aug 2011.
  29. Norman, D. (1988). The psychology of everyday things. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  30. Norman, D. (1998). The invisible computer. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  31. Runco, M. A. (1996). Creativity and development; Recommendations. New Directions for Child Development, 72(Summer), 87–90.Google Scholar
  32. Runco, M. A. (1998). Creativity research: Originality, utility, and integration. Creativity Research Journal, 1, 1–7.Google Scholar
  33. Runco, M. A. (2008, May). Creativity and education. New Horizons in Education, 56(1).Google Scholar
  34. Salomon, G. (Ed.). (1993). Distributed cognitions – Psychological and educational considerations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  35. Sharples, M., & Scanlon, E. (Eds.). (2011). Final report: Personal inquiry (PI): Designing for evidence-based inquiry learning across formal and informal settings. Nottingham: University of Nottingham.Google Scholar
  36. Siemens, G. (2005). Connectivism: A learning theory for the digital age. International Journal of Instructional Technology and Distance Learning, 2(1), 3–10.Google Scholar
  37. Soegaard, M. (2010). Affordance. Available online from Interaction-Design.org: http://www.interaction-design.org/encyclopedia/affordances.html. Accessed 11 Aug 2011.
  38. Sorenson, E., Conole, E., & Marlung, A. M. (2010). Special journal issue on creativity and Open Educational Resource (OER), Special issue of EURODL, http://www.eurodl.org/?p=Special&sp=init2. Accessed 11 Aug 2011.Google Scholar
  39. Stephani, L., Mason, R., & Pegler, C. (2007). The educational potential of e-portfolios: Supporting personal development and reflective learning. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  40. Topping, K. (1992). Cooperative learning and peer tutoring: An overview. The Psychologist: Bulletin of the British Psychological Society, 5, 151–161.Google Scholar
  41. Vygotsky, L. S. (1962). Thought and language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  43. Wagner, E. D. (1994). In Support of a function definition of interaction. The American Journal of Distance Education, 8(20), 6–29.Google Scholar
  44. Wallas, G. (1926). Art of thought. New York: Harcourt Brace.Google Scholar
  45. Weiser, M., & Seely Brown, J. (1995). Designing calm technology. Palo Alto: Xerox Parc. Available online at http://www.ubiq.com/hypertext/weiser/calmtech/calmtech.htm. Accessed 11 Aug 2011.
  46. Yang, S. H. (2009). Using blogs to enhance critical reflection and community of practice. Educational Technology and Society, 12(2), 11–21. Available online at http://www.ifets.info/journals/12_2/2.pdf. Accessed 11 Aug 2011.

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Gráinne Conole
    • 1
  1. 1.Beyond Distance Research AllianceUniversity of LeicesterLeicesterUK

Personalised recommendations