Advertisement

Open, Social and Participatory Media

  • Gráinne Conole
Chapter
Part of the Explorations in the Learning Sciences, Instructional Systems and Performance Technologies book series (LSIS, volume 4)

Abstract

This chapter considers the impact of new, open, social and participatory technologies on education and in particular how they are changing learning and teaching practices. It will consider their fundamental characteristics and look at the implications for learners, teachers and institutions. It argues that the impact on practice can be both positive and negative and that as a consequence educational institutions need to develop new policies and strategies to take account of these. This chapter considers the new forms of user behaviour that are resulting and provides examples of ways in which they are being used to support teaching and learning.

Keywords

Virtual World Social Networking Site Social Entrepreneurialism Learn Management System Voice Over Internet Protocol 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Ala-Mutka, K., Bacigalupo, M., Kluzer, S., Pascu, C., Punie, Y., & Redecker, C. (2009). Review of learning 2.0 practices (IPTS Tech. Rep. Prepared for Publication). Seville: IPTS. Available online at http://ipts.jrc.ec.europa.eu/publications/pub.cfm?id=2139. Accessed 18 Apr 2009.
  2. Al-Zoube, M. (2009), E-learning on the cloud. International Arab Journal of e-Technology, 1(2). Available online at http://aou.edu.jo/aou_new/datafiles/Research/iajet/vol_1.2_2009/E-Learning%20on%20the%20Cloud.pdf. Accessed 11 Aug 2011.
  3. Anderson, C. (2004). The long tail. Wired Magazine. Available online at http://www.wired.com/wired/archive/12.10/tail.html. Accessed 11 Aug 2011.
  4. Anderson, P. (2007, February). What is Web 2.0? Ideas, technologies and implications for education. Citeseer, JISC Technology and Standards Watch. Available online at http://www.jisc.ac.uk/media/documents/techwatch/tsw0701b.pdf. Accessed 11 Aug 2011.
  5. Atkins, D. E., Seely Brown, J., & Hammond, A. L. (2007). A review of the open educational resource movement: Achievements, challenges and new opportunities. Report to the William and Hewlett Foundation. Available online at http://www.hewlett.org/uploads/files/ReviewoftheOERMovement.pdf. Accessed 20 Sept 2011.
  6. Beck, U. (1992). Risk society towards a new modernity. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  7. Beetham, H., McGill, L., & Littlejohn, A. (2009). Thriving in the 21st century: Learning literacies for the digital age (LLiDA Project Report). Available online at http://www.academy.gcal.ac.uk/llida/LLiDAReportJune2009.pdf. Accessed 11 Aug 2011.
  8. Borgeman, C. L., Abelson, H., Dirks, L., Johnson, R., Koedinger, K., Linn, M. C., Lynch, C. A., Oblinger, D. G., Pea, R. D., Salen, K., Smith, M., & Azalay, A. (2008). Fostering learning in the networked world: The cyberlearning opportunity and challenge (Report of the NSF Task Force on Cyberlearning). Available online at http://www.nsf.gov/pubs/2008/nsf08204/nsf08204.pdf . Accessed 7 Oct 2011.
  9. Boys, J. (2010). Towards culture learning spaces: Re-thinking the architective of post–Compelxay education. London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  10. Coles, S., Frey, J., Hursthouse, M., Light, M., Milsted, A., Carr, L., DeRoure, D., Gutteridge, C., Mills, H., Meacham, K., Surridge, M., Lyon, E., Heery, R., Duke, M., & Day, M. (2006). An e-science environment for service crystallography-from submission to dissemination. Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling, Special Issue on eScience, 46(3), 1006–1016.Google Scholar
  11. Conole, G. (2009, December 8). New digital spaces – Pushing the boundaries into the unknown; trajectories of user behaviour in new frontiers. Invited keynote, Ascilite 2009, Auckland, New Zealand.Google Scholar
  12. Conole, G. (2010). Stepping over the edge: The implications of new technologies for education. In M. J. W. Lee & C. McLoughlin (Eds.), Web 2.0-based e-learning: Applying social informatics for tertiary teaching. Hershey: IGI Global.Google Scholar
  13. Conole, G., & Alevizou, P. (2010). Review of the use(s) of Web 2.0 in Higher Education (HE Academy Commissioned Report). Available online at http://www.heacademy.ac.uk/assets/EvidenceNet/Conole_Alevizou_2010.pdf. Accessed 11 Aug 2011.
  14. Conole, G., & Culver, J. (2009). Cloudworks: Social networking for learning design. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 25(5). Available online at http://www.ascilite.org.au/ajet/ajet25/conole.html. Accessed 11 Aug 2011.
  15. Conole, G., & Culver, J. (2010). The design of cloud works: Applying social networking practice to foster the exchange of learning and teaching ideas and designs. Computers in Education, 54(3), 679–692.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Craig, E. M. (2007). Changing paradigms: Managed learning environments and Web 2.0. Campus Wide Information Systems, 24(3), 152–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Crook, C., Cummings, J., Fisher, T., Graber, R., Harrison, C., & Lewin, C. (2008). Web 2.0 technologies for learning: The current landscape – Opportunities, challenges and tensions (A BECTA Report) Available online at http://dera.ioe.ac.uk/1474/1/becta_2008_web2_currentlandscape_litrev.pdf. Accessed 11 Aug 2011.
  18. Cummings, D. (2011, June 15). Design considerations of experiential learning spaces, blog post. Random Acts of Learning Blog. http://actrandom.tumblr.com/post/6548128998/conference-paper-at-university-planning-and-design. Accessed 6 Sept 2011.
  19. De Freitas, S., & Conole, G. (2010). Learners experiences: How pervasive and integrative tools influence expectations of study. In R. Sharpe, H. Beetham, & S. De Freitas (Eds.), Rethinking learning for a digital age: How learners are shaping their own experiences (pp. 15–30). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  20. Dong, B., Zheng, Q., Qiao, M., & Yang, J. (2009). Bluesky cloud framework: An e-learning framework embracing cloud computing. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 5931, 577–582.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Downes, S. (2005, October 15). E-learning 2.0. eLearn Magazine, 2005(10). Available online at http://www.elearnmag.org/subpage.cfm?section=articlesandarticle=29-1. Accessed 11 Aug 2011.
  22. Dron, J., & Anderson, T. (2007). Collectives, networks and groups in social software for e-learning. In Proceedings of World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education (Vol. 16, 2008), Quebec.Google Scholar
  23. Ebner, M. (2007, April 10–13). E-learning 2.0  =  e-learning 1.0  +  Web 2.0? In Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Availability, Security and Reliability, Vienna, Austria.Google Scholar
  24. Hernández, D., Asensio, J. I., Dimitriadis, Y., & Villasclaras, E. D. (2011). Pattern languages for generating CSCL scripts: From a conceptual model to the design of a real situation. In P. Goodyear & S. Retalis (Eds.), E-learning, design patterns and pattern languages. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.Google Scholar
  25. Jenkins, H. (2009). Confronting the challenges of participatory culture: Media education for the 21st century. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  26. Jenkins, H., Clinton, K., Purushotma, R., Robison, A. J., & Weigel, M. (2006). Confronting the challenges of participatory culture: Media education for the 21st century (MacArthur Commissioned Report). Available online http://digitallearning.macfound.org/atf/cf/%7B7E45C7E0-A3E0-4B89-AC9C-E807E1B0AE4E%7D/JENKINS_WHITE_PAPER.PDF. Accessed 11 Aug 2011
  27. JISC. (2006). Designing spaces for effective learning: A guide to 21st century learning space design. Available online at http://www.jisc.ac.uk/eli_learningspaces.html. Accessed 6 Sept 2011.
  28. Katz, R. (2008). The tower and the cloud: Higher Education in the age of cloud computing. An Educause ebook. Available online at http://net.educause.edu/ir/library/pdf/PUB7202.pdf. Accessed 11 Aug 2011.
  29. Lankshear, C., & Knobel, M. (2006). Digital literacies: Policy, pedagogy and research considerations for education. Nordic Journal of Digital Literacy, 1(1), 226.Google Scholar
  30. Lévy, P. (1997). Collective intelligence: Mankind’s emerging world in cyberspace (R. Bononno, Trans.). Cambridge, MA: Perseus Books.Google Scholar
  31. Mathes, A. (2004). Folksonomies – Cooperative classification and communication through shared metadata. Computer Mediated Communication. Available online at http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.135.1000andrep=rep1andtype=pdf. Accessed 11 Aug 2011.
  32. McAndrew, P., Godwin, S., & Santos, A. (2008). Identifying Web 2.0 learning in open educational resources. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning (special issue on Web 2.0 and learning: a revolutionary paradigm or a variation of CSCL).Google Scholar
  33. NMC. (2012). The horizon report (2011 ed.). The New Media Consortium. Accessed 11 Aug 2011.Google Scholar
  34. Nozuri, A. (2006). Folksonomies: (Un)controlled vocabulary? Knowledge Organization, 33(4), 199–203. Ergon Verlag. Available online at http://eprints.rclis.org/bitstream/10760/10307/1/Folksonomy%2c_UnControled_Vocabulary.pdf. Accessed 11 Aug 2011.
  35. O’Reilly, T. (2004, January 7, 2011). The architecture of participation. Available online at http://www.oreillynet.com/pub/a/oreilly/tim/articles/architecture_of_participation.html. Accessed 11 Aug 2011.
  36. O’Reilly, T. (2005). What is Web 2.0 – Design patterns and business models for the next generation of software. Available online at http://oreill.ynet.com/pub/a/oreilly/tim/news/2005/09/30/what-is-Web-20.html. Accessed 11 Aug 2011.
  37. OECD. (2007). Giving knowledge for free – The emergence of open educational resources. Paris: OECD Centre for Educational Research and Innovation. Available online at http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/35/7/38654317.pdf. Accessed 11 Aug 2011.
  38. Okada, A., Shum, S. B., & Sherborne, T. (2008). Knowledge cartography: Software tools and mapping techniques. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  39. Redecker, C., Ala-Mutka, K., Bacigalupo, M., Ferrari, A., & Punie, Y. (2009). Learning 2.0: The impact of Web 2.0 innovations in education and training in Europe. Seville: Institute for Prospective Technological Studies. Available online at http://ipts.jrc.ec.europa.eu/publications/pub.cfm?id=2899. Accessed 11 Aug 2011.
  40. Rooney, P., Mac Namee, B. (2007, March 7–9). Students @ play: Serious games for learning in Higher Education. INTED2007 International Technology, Education and Development Conference, Valencia.Google Scholar
  41. Seely Brown, J. (2006). New learning environments for the 21st century – Exploring the edge. The Magazine of Higher Learning, 38, 18–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Sharpe, R., Beetham, H., & De Freitas, S. (Eds.). (2010). Rethinking learning for the digital age: How learners shape their own experiences. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  43. Sharples, M., & Scanlon, E. (Eds.). (2011). Final report: Personal inquiry (PI): Designing for evidence-based inquiry learning across formal and informal settings. Nottingham: University of Nottingham.Google Scholar
  44. Siemens, G. (2009, July 5). Connectivism and connective knowledge 2009, blog post. Available online at http://ltc.umanitoba.ca/connectivism/?p=189. Accessed 11 Aug 2011.
  45. Sigala, M. (2007). Integrating Web 2.0 in e-learning environments: A socio-technical approach. International Journal of Knowledge and Learning, 3(6), 628–648.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Solove, D. J. (2004). The digital person – Technology and privacy in the information age. New York: New University Press.Google Scholar
  47. Surowiecki, J. (2004). The wisdom of the crowds: Why the many are smarter than the few and how collective wisdom shapes business, economies, societies and nations. New York: Doubleday.Google Scholar
  48. Virilio, P. (1998). The information bomb. London: Verso.Google Scholar
  49. Warschauer, M. (2004). Technology and social inclusion: Rethinking the digital divide. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  50. Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice. Learning, meaning and identity (Learning in doing: Social, cognitive, and computational perspectives). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  51. Wills, G., Woukeu, A., Bailey, C., Carr, L., Conole, G., Hall, W., & Grange, S. (2004, June 21–26). Ontologically driven learning agreements. In Proceedings of the Edmedia Conference, Lugano, Switzerland.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Gráinne Conole
    • 1
  1. 1.Beyond Distance Research AllianceUniversity of LeicesterLeicesterUK

Personalised recommendations