• Gráinne Conole
Part of the Explorations in the Learning Sciences, Instructional Systems and Performance Technologies book series (LSIS, volume 4)


This chapter provides a conclusion to and reflection on the book. I summarise the key messages conveyed throughout the book, along with considering the implications of each topic. I critically reflect on the implications of each of the topics and, in particular, what impact the learning design methodology described in this book is likely to have on learning and teaching and how it can help to change the way learning interventions are designed. The central thesis of this work is that we need new approaches to design in order to make more effective use of new open, social and participatory media.


Open Educational Resource Learning Intervention Learning Design Massive Online Open Course Teaching Idea 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Agostinho, S., Harper, B., Oliver, R., Hedberg, J., & Wills, S. (2008). A visual learning design representation to facilitate dissemination and reuse of innovative pedagogical strategies in university teaching. In L. Botturi & S. T. Stubbs (Eds.), Handbook of visual languages for instructional design: Theories and practices (pp. 380–393). Hershey: Information Science Reference.Google Scholar
  2. Beetham, H., & Sharpe, R. (2007). Rethinking pedagogy for a digital age: Designing and delivering e-Learning. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  3. Conole, C. (2004). E-Learning: The hype and the reality. Journal of Interactive Media in Education 2004(12). Available online at Accessed 11 Aug 2011.
  4. Conole, G. (2008). Capturing practice, the role of mediating artefacts in learning design. In L. Lockyer, S. Bennett, S. Agostinho, & B. Harper (Eds.), Handbook of learning designs and learning objects. Hershey: IGI Global.Google Scholar
  5. Downes, S. (2007). Models for sustainable open educational resources. Interdisciplinary Journal of Knowledge and Learning Objects, 3, 29–44.Google Scholar
  6. Falconer, I., & Littlejohn, A. (2008). Representing models of practice. In L. Lockyer, S. Bennet, S. Agostinho, & B. Harper (Eds.), Handbook of research on learning design and learning objects. Hershey: Idea Group.Google Scholar
  7. Gibson, J. J. (1977). The theory of affordances. In R. Shaw & J. Bransford (Eds.), Perceiving, acting, and knowing (pp. 67–82). Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  8. Gibson, J. J. (1979). The ecological approach to visual perception. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associated.Google Scholar
  9. Jenkins, H. (2009). Confronting the challenges of participatory culture: Media education for the 21st century. Cambridge, MA: Mit Press.Google Scholar
  10. Jenkins, H., Clinton, K., Purushotma, R., Robison, A. J., & Weigel, M. (2006). Confronting the challenges of participatory culture: Media education for the 21st century, MacArthur commissioned report. Available online Accessed 11 Aug 2011.
  11. Katz, R. (2008). The tower and the cloud: Higher Education in the age of cloud computing, an Educause ebook. Available online at,Accessed 11 Aug 2011.
  12. Koedinger, K. R., & Corbett, A. (2008). Technology bringing learning science to the classroom. In R. K. Sawyer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (pp. 61–77). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Lockyer, L., Bennett, S., Agostinho, S., & Harper, B. (2008). Handbook of research on learning design and learning objects. New York: Information Science Reference.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Masterman, L. (2008). Activity theory and the design of pedagogic planning tools. In L. Lockyer, S. Bennett, S. Agostinho, & B. Harper (Eds.), Handbook of research on learning design and learning objects: Issues, applications and technologies (Vol. 1, pp. 209–227). Hershey: Information Science Reference.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Oliver, R. (2000, December 9–12). Where teaching meets learning: Design principles and strategies for Web-based learning environments that support knowledge construction. ASCILITE 2000 conference, Coffs Harbour. Available online at Accessed 11 Aug 2011.
  16. Sawyer, R. K. (2006). The Cambridge handbook of learning sciences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Sharpe, R., Beetham, H., & De Freitas, S. (2010). Rethinking learning for the digital age: How learners shape their own experiences. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  18. Warschauer, M. (2004). Technology and social inclusion: Rethinking the digital divide. Cambridge: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
  19. Weller, M. (2011). Digital, networked and open. London: Bloomsbury Academics.Google Scholar
  20. Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice. Learning, meaning and identity. Learning in doing: Social, Cognitive, and computational perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Gráinne Conole
    • 1
  1. 1.Beyond Distance Research AllianceUniversity of LeicesterLeicesterUK

Personalised recommendations