Abstract
Having established that the MacSAC-CD is a psychometrically sound and valid research instrument, we conducted additional analyses of the data from the main field study to explore three important research issues regarding the competence of criminal defendants. These issues are: (a) the relationships of diagnosis and psychiatric symptomatology to legal capacity, (b) the extent to which defendants’ capacities are consistent across different competence-related abilities and different legal domains (assisting counsel versus decisional competence), and (c) the degree to which impaired abilities in the adjudicative competence area are mirrored by impaired competence in the area of competence to make treatment decisions (i.e., to accept or refuse psychotropic medication). In this chapter we report the results of these additional analyses.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2002 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Poythress, N.G., Bonnie, R.J., Monahan, J., Otto, R., Hoge, S.K. (2002). Research Issues in Adjudicative Competence. In: Adjudicative Competence. Perspectives in Law & Psychology, vol 15. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-8493-7_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-8493-7_4
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-1-4613-4629-6
Online ISBN: 978-1-4419-8493-7
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive