Abstract
With today‘s ubiquity and popularity of social network applications, the ability to analyze and understand large networks in an efficient manner becomes critically important. However, as networks become larger and more complex, reasoning about social dynamics via simple statistics is not a feasible option. To overcome these limitations, we can rely on visual metaphors. Visualization nowadays is no longer a passive process that produces images from a set of numbers. Recent years have witnessed a convergence of social network analytics and visualization, coupled with interaction, that is changing the way analysts understand and characterize social networks. In this chapter, we discuss the main goal of visualization and how different metaphors are aimed towards elucidating different aspects of social networks, such as structure and semantics. We also describe a number of methods where analytics and visualization are interwoven towards providing a better comprehension of social structure and dynamics.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Aleks Aris and Ben Shneiderman. Designing semantic substrates for visual network exploration. Information Visualization, 6(4):281–300, 2007.
Enrico Bertini and Denis Lalanne. Surveying the complementary role of automatic data analysis and visualization in knowledge discovery. In VAKD ’09: Proceedings of the ACM SIGKDD Workshop on Visual Analytics and Knowledge Discovery, pages 12–20, New York, NY, USA, 2009. ACM.
Philip Bonacich. Factoring and weighting approaches to status scores and clique identification. J. of Mathematical Sociology, 2(1):113–120, 1972.
Ulrik Brandes. Drawing on physical analogies. pages 71–86, 2001.
Ulrik Brandes, Patrick Kenis, Jörg Raab, Volker Schneider, and Dorothea Wagner. Explorations into the visualization of policy networks. Journal of Theoretical Politics, 11(11):75–106, 1998.
Ulrik Brandes, Patrick Kenis, and Dorothea Wagner. Communicating centrality in policy network drawings. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 9(2):241–253, 2003.
Ulrik Brandes and Christian Pich. An experimental study on distancebased graph drawing. pages 218–229, 2009.
Ulrik Brandes and Dorothea Wagner. Visone - analysis and visualization of social networks. In Graph Drawing Software, pages 321–340. Springer-Verlag, 2003.
Carlos D. Correa, Tarik Crnovrsanin, Kwan-Liu Ma, and Kimberly Keeton. The derivatives of centrality and their applications in visualizing social networks. Technical report, Computer Science, CSE-2009-5. University of California at Davis, 2009.
Tarik Crnovrsanin, Carlos D. Correa, and Kwan-Liu Ma. Social network discovery based on sensitivity analysis. In ASONAM ’09: Proceedings of the 2009 International Conference on Advances in Social Network Analysis and Mining, pages 107–112, Washington, DC, USA, 2009. IEEE Computer Society.
Patrick Doreian, Vladimir Batagelj, Anuska Ferligoj, and Mark Granovetter. Generalized Blockmodeling (Structural Analysis in the Social Sciences). Cambridge University Press, New York, NY, USA, 2004.
Tim Dwyer, Seok-Hee Hong, Dirk Koschützki, Falk Schreiber, and Kai Xu. Visual analysis of network centralities. In APVis ’06: Proceedings of the 2006 Asia-Pacific Symposium on Information Visualisation, pages 189–197, Darlinghurst, Australia, Australia, 2006. Australian Computer Society, Inc.
Linton Freeman. Visualizing social networks. Journal of Social Structure, 1(1), 2000.
Linton C Freeman. Centrality in social networks: Conceptual clarification. Social Networks, Vol. 1, No. 3(3):215 –239, 1979.
Stefan Hachul and Michael Jünger. An experimental comparison of fast algorithms for drawing general large graphs. In In Proc. Graph Drawing, pages 235–250. Springer-Verlag, 2005.
Jeffrey Heer and Danah Boyd. Vizster: Visualizing online social networks. In INFOVIS ’05: Proceedings of the Proceedings of the 2005 IEEE Symposium on Information Visualization, page 5, Washington, DC, USA, 2005. IEEE Computer Society.
Jeffrey Heer and Danah Boyd. Vizster: Visualizing online social networks. In Proc. IEEE Symposium on Information Visualization, page 5, 2005.
Nathalie Henry and Jean-Daniel Fekete. Matlink: enhanced matrix visualization for analyzing social networks. In INTERACT’07: Proceedings of the 11th IFIP TC 13 international conference on Human-computer interaction, pages 288–302, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2007. Springer-Verlag.
Nathalie Henry, Jean-Daniel Fekete, and Michael J. McGuffin. Nodetrix: a hybrid visualization of social networks. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 13(6):1302–1309, 2007.
Ivan Herman, Guy Melançon, and M. Scott Marshall. Graph visualization and navigation in information visualization: A survey. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 6(1):24–43, 2000.
Danny Holten. Hierarchical edge bundles: Visualization of adjacency relations in hierarchical data. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 12(5):741–748, 2006.
Yuntao Jia, Jared Hoberock, Michael Garland, and John Hart. On the visualization of social and other scale-free networks. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 14:1285–1292, 2008.
Goh Oh Kahng, E. Oh, B. Kahng, and D. Kim. Betweenness centrality correlation in social networks. Phys. Rev. E, 67:01710–1, 2003.
Hyunmo Kang, Lise Getoor, and Lisa Singh. Visual analysis of dynamic group membership in temporal social networks. SIGKDD Explor. Newsl., 9(2):13–21, 2007.
Alden S. Klovdahl. A note on images of networks. Social Networks, 3(3):197–214, 1981.
Yehuda Koren. On spectral graph drawing. In Proc. 9th Inter. Computing and Combinatorics Conference (COCOONÕ03), LNCS 2697, pages 496–508. Springer-Verlag, 2002.
D. Koschützki and F. Schreiber. Comparison of centralities for biological networks. In Proc German Conf Bioinformatics (GCB’04), pages 199–2006, 2004.
James Moody, Daniel Mc Farland, and Skye Bender-deMoll. Dynamic network visualization. American Journal of Sociology, 110(4):1206–1241, 2005.
Chris Muelder and Kwan-Liu Ma. Rapid graph layout using space filling curves. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 14(6):1301–1308, 2008.
Galileo Mark Namata, Brian Staats, Lise Getoor, and Ben Shneiderman. A dual-view approach to interactive network visualization. In CIKM ’07: Proceedings of the sixteenth ACM conference on Conference on information and knowledge management, pages 939–942, New York, NY, USA, 2007. ACM.
Andreas Noack. Modularity clustering is force-directed layout. CoRR, abs/0807.4052, 2008.
M. L. A Northway. Method for depicting social relationships obtained by sociometric testing. sociometry. 3(2), 1940.
Adam Perer and Ben Shneiderman. Balancing systematic and flexible exploration of social networks. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 12(5):693–700, 2006.
Adam Perer and Ben Shneiderman. Integrating statistics and visualization: case studies of gaining clarity during exploratory data analysis. In CHI ’08: Proc. SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, pages 265–274, 2008.
William A. Pike, John Stasko, Remco Chang and Theresa A. O’Connell. The Science of Interaction. In Information Visualization, 8(4):263–274, 2009.
Zeqian Shen and Kwan-Liu Ma. Path visualization for adjacency matrices. In EuroVis, pages 83–90, 2007.
Zeqian Shen and Kwan-Liu Ma. Mobivis: A visualization system for exploring mobile data. In PacificVis, pages 175–182, 2008.
Zeqian Shen, Kwan-Liu Ma, and Tina Eliassi-Rad. Visual analysis of large heterogeneous social networks by semantic and structural abstraction. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 12(6):1427–1439, 2006.
Lei Shi, Nan Cao, Shixia Liu, Weihong Qian, Li Tan, Guodong Wang, Jimeng Sun, and Ching-Yung Lin. Himap: Adaptive visualization of largescale online social networks. In PACIFICVIS ’09: Proceedings of the 2009 IEEE Pacific Visualization Symposium, pages 41–48, Washington, DC, USA, 2009. IEEE Computer Society.
Edward R. Tufte. The visual display of quantitative information. Graphics Press, Cheshire, CT, USA, 1986.
F. van Ham and M. Wattenberg. Centrality based visualization of small world graphs. Computer Graphics Forum, 27(3):975–982, 2008.
Frank van Ham and Adam Perer. Search, Show Context, Expand on Demand: Supporting large graph exploration with degree-of-interest. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 15(6):953–960, 2009.
VAST Challenge. IEEE VAST 2008 challenge. http://www.cs.umd.edu/hcil/vastchallenge08/, 2008.
Fernanda B. Viégas, Danah Boyd, David H. Nguyen, Jeffrey Potter, and Judith Donath. Digital artifacts for remembering and storytelling: Posthistory and social network fragments. In HICSS ’04: Proceedings of the Proceedings of the 37th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS’04) - Track 4, page 40109.1, Washington, DC, USA, 2004. IEEE Computer Society.
Fernanda B. Vi?gas, Danah Boyd, David H. Nguyen, Jeffrey Potter, and Judith Donath. Digital artifacts for remembering and storytelling: Posthistory and social network fragments. Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 4:40109a, 2004.
Martin Wattenberg. Visual exploration of multivariate graphs. In CHI ’06: Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human Factors in computing systems, pages 811–819, New York, NY, USA, 2006. ACM.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2011 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Correa, C.D., Ma, KL. (2011). Visualizing Social Networks. In: Aggarwal, C. (eds) Social Network Data Analytics. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-8462-3_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-8462-3_11
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-1-4419-8461-6
Online ISBN: 978-1-4419-8462-3
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)