Skip to main content

Importance of Hinterland Transport Networks for Operational Efficiency in Seaport Container Terminals

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Handbook of Terminal Planning

Part of the book series: Operations Research/Computer Science Interfaces Series ((ORCS,volume 49))

Abstract

In recent decades the intermodal container transport has emerged more and more as the basis for a globalized economy. This results in accordant seaport container terminal requirements as transhipment nodes and as an interface between different modes of transport. However, the performance in the nodes of a network only represents one aspect, as the capacity in the inbound and outbound flows, i.e. the deep sea and the hinterland traffic, has to play an important role in these considerations. To solve the problem of hinterland transport concepts are presented which include a dislocation of the terminal structures as well as a bigger involvement of rail freight transport. Although the rapid growth of the container transport in recent years clearly declined because of the global recession in 2009, no fundamental changes are expected, as shown by current developments (and forecasts). The quantities which have to be dealt with are rising again (and continue to rise), even if with a temporal lag, so that there is still need for action, especially concerning the linking of seaport container terminals with the hinterland.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Alicke K (2002) Modelling and optimization of the intermodal terminal mega hub. OR Spectrum 24:1–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anonymous (2008) Prognose der deutschlandweiten Verkehrsverflechtung – Seeverkehrsprognose (Los 3). Gutachten (Planco), Bundesministeriums für Verkehr, Bau und Stadtentwicklung, Duisburg

    Google Scholar 

  • Baird AJ (2007) The economics of motorways of the sea. Maritime Policies & Management 34:287–310

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Belter B, Fricke E (2008) Nutzen für Häfen und Bahnen – Das Projekt Masterplan Seehafenhinterlandanbindung. ETR Eisenbahntechnische Rundschau 57:174–177

    Google Scholar 

  • Bostel N, Dejax P (1998) Models and algorithms for container allocation problems on trains in a rapid transshipment shunting yard. Transportation Science 32:370–379

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Breimeier R (2009) Netzentwicklung der Eisenbahn für den Hinterlandverkehr der deutschen Nordseehäfen. ZEVrail 133:200–209

    Google Scholar 

  • Paixão Casaca AC, Marlow PB (2009) Logistics strategies for short sea shipping operating as part of multimodal transport chains. Maritime Policy & Management 36:1–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Charles L (2008) Sea-river shipping competitiveness and its geographical market area for the Rhône-Saône corridor. Journal of Transport Geography 16:100–116

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daduna JR (2005) Einsatz von Flottenmanagementsystemen zur Überwachung und Steuerung logistischer Prozesse. logistik management 7(4):45–63

    Google Scholar 

  • Daduna JR (2009) Verkehrsträgerwettbewerb im Güterverkehr – Eine Scheindiskussion? In: Voß S, Pahl J, Schwarze S (eds) Logistik Management – Systeme, Methoden, Integration, Physica, Heidelberg, pp 247–260

    Google Scholar 

  • Dellmann T, Berger A (2006) Autonomie und Automation der Eisenbahn im Kontext der Verkehrstechnik. ETR Einsenbahntechnische Rundschau 55:233–240

    Google Scholar 

  • Dimitrijevic B, Spasovic LN (2006) Providing Linkages between Port Terminals and Inland Freight Distribution Facilities. Contribution to METRANs National Urban Freight Conference (Long Beach)

    Google Scholar 

  • Eickmann C, Kohlruss J, Schumann T (2008) Hinterlandanbindung – Sinnvolle Koordination von Maßnahmen im Schienenverkehr zur Bewältigung des zu erwartenden Verkehrsaufkommens. Gutachten (Abschlussbericht), Deutsches Zentrum für Luft- und Raumfahrt (DLR), Köln

    Google Scholar 

  • Fremont A (2007) Global maritime networks – the case of maersk. Journal of Transport Geography 15:431–442

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gardiner N (ed) (2009a) Annual Review of Global Container Terminal Operators 2009. Drewry Publishing, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardiner N (ed) (2009b) Container Market 2009/10 – Annual Review and Forecast. Drewry Publishing, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Guy E, Alix Y (2007) A successful upriver port? container shipping in Montréal. Journal of Transport Geography 15:46–55

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heymann E (2006) Containerschifffahrt – Überkapazitäten trotz steigender Nachfrage programmiert. Aktuelle Themen 347, Deutsche Bank Research, Frankfurt am Main

    Google Scholar 

  • IAPH [International Association of Ports and Harbors] (2010) World Container Traffic. http://www.iaphworldports.org/world_port_info/statistics.html, accessed 05 Jun 2010

  • Ickert L, Matthes U, Rommerskirchen S, Weyand E, Schlesinger M, Limbers J (2007) Abschätzung der langfristigen Entwicklung des Güterverkehrs in Deutschland bis 2050. Gutachten (progtrans AG), Bundesministeriums für Verkehr, Bau und Stadtentwicklung, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • James KA, Gurol S (2006) Urban Maglev Freight Container Movement at the Ports of Los Angeles / Long Beach. METRANS Transportation Center (ed), Online Publication: http://www.metrans.org/nuf/documents/KenJames.pdf, California, 20 pp

  • Jaržemskis A, Vasisliaukas AV (2007) Research on dryport concept as intermodal node. Transport 22:207–213

    Google Scholar 

  • Keppel A (2010) Finanzierungsmodelle auch für Bedarfsmaßnahmen der Schiene. EI – Der Eisenbahningenieur 61(5):33–36

    Google Scholar 

  • Kücükay F, Haney D (2004) Assistenzsysteme in der Fertigungstechnik (Braunschweig). In: Gesamtzentrum fr Verkehr Braunschweig (ed) Proceedings of the Conference on Automatisierungs- und Assistenzsysteme ür Transportmittel, pp 123–143

    Google Scholar 

  • Lahl U (2007) Chancen für eine nachhaltige Hafenentwicklung. PPP Infrastructure 2(3+4):13–14

    Google Scholar 

  • Limbourg S (2007) Planification strategique de Systemes de Transport de Marchandises en Europe – Modèles de Localisations optimales de Hubs de Conteneurs sur un Rèseau multimodal. These de doctorat, Falcultès Universitaires Catholiques de Mons, Mons

    Google Scholar 

  • Mairhofer F (2003) CargoMover – Das Mobilitätskonzept von Siemens für einen Güterverkehr mit Zukunft. In: Verein Deutscher Ingenieure (VDI) (ed) Gesamtverkehrsforum 2003, VDI Verlag, Düsseldorf, pp 287–295

    Google Scholar 

  • Mansfeld W (ed) (2004) Satellitenortung und Navigation. 2. Aufl. Vieweg, Braunschweig

    Google Scholar 

  • Müller M, Schönknecht A (2005) Kapitalrendite bei Großcontainerschiffen. Internationales Verkehrswesen 57:377–379

    Google Scholar 

  • Notteboom TE (2004) Container shipping and ports – an overview. Review of Network Economics 3(2):86–106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Notteboom TE (2007) Inland waterway transport of containerised cargo – from infancy to a fully-fledged transport mode. Journal of Maritime Research 4(2):63–80

    Google Scholar 

  • Notteboom TE (2009) Relationships between Seaports and the Intermodal Hinterland in Light of Global Supply Chains – European Challenges. In: OECD / ITF (ed) Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development, pp 25–76

    Google Scholar 

  • Panayides PM, Song DW (2008) Evaluating the integration of seaport container terminals in supply chains. International Journal of Physical Distribution and Logistics Management 38:562–584

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosa A, Roscelli R (2009) Innovative Ideas and Design of an Integrated Dry Port and Sea Port System. In: United Nations Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific (ESCAP) (ed) Transport and Communications Bulletin for Asia and the Pacific 78 (Development of Dry Ports), pp 57–72

    Google Scholar 

  • Roso V (2008) Factors influencing implementation of a dry port. International Journal of Physical Distribution and Logistics Management 38:782–798

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roso V, Woxenius J, Lumsden K (2009) The dry port concept – connecting container seaports with the hinterland. Journal of Transport Geography 17:338–345

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rudolf III CD (2007) Ship-to-shore productivity – can it keep up with mega-ship size increases? (part 1). Port Technology International 34:78–83

    Google Scholar 

  • Sànchez RJ, Wilmsmeier G (2005) Short-sea shipping potentials in Central America to bridge infrastructural gaps. Maritime Policy & Management 32:227–244

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schönemann R (2010) Schienengüterverkehr an der Schnittstelle zum Seeschiff. Internationales Verkehrswesen 62(4):30–35

    Google Scholar 

  • Siegmann J, Heidmeier S (2005) Improved Quality of Rail Freight Service by Using Self-Propelled Freight Wagons. In: Konings R, Priemus H, Nijkamp P (eds) The Future of Automated Freight Transport, Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham, pp 35–50

    Google Scholar 

  • Slack B (1999) Satellite terminals – a local solution to hub congestion? Journal of Transport Geography 7:241–246

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Slack B (2007) The Terminalisation of Seaports. In: Wang, J and Olivier, D and Notteboom, T and Slack, B (ed) Ports, Cities and Global Supply Chains, Ashgate, Farnham, pp 41–50

    Google Scholar 

  • Stahlbock R, , Voß S (2008) Operations research at container terminals – a literature update. OR Spectrum 30:1–52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steenken D, Voß S, Stahlbock R (2004) Container terminal operation and operation research – a classification and literature review. OR Spectrum 26:3–49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stenvert R, Penfold A (2007) Container Port Strategy – Emerging Issues. Study, Ocean Shipping Consultants, Ocean House

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Der Horst MR, de Langen PW (2008) Coordination in hinterland transport chains – a major challenge for the seaport community. Maritime Economics & Logistics 10:108–129

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wiegmans BW, Van Der Hoest A, Notteboom TE (2008) Port and terminal selection by deep-sea container operators. Maritime Policy & Management 35:517–534

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang J, Ioannou PH, Chassiakos A (2006) Intelligent Transportation System for Container Movement between Inland Port and Terminals. METRANS Transportation Center (ed), Online Publication: http://www.metrans.org/nuf/documents/Zhang.pdf, California, 27 pp

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Joachim R. Daduna .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Daduna, J.R. (2011). Importance of Hinterland Transport Networks for Operational Efficiency in Seaport Container Terminals. In: Böse, J. (eds) Handbook of Terminal Planning. Operations Research/Computer Science Interfaces Series, vol 49. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-8408-1_19

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics