Abstract
In recent decades the intermodal container transport has emerged more and more as the basis for a globalized economy. This results in accordant seaport container terminal requirements as transhipment nodes and as an interface between different modes of transport. However, the performance in the nodes of a network only represents one aspect, as the capacity in the inbound and outbound flows, i.e. the deep sea and the hinterland traffic, has to play an important role in these considerations. To solve the problem of hinterland transport concepts are presented which include a dislocation of the terminal structures as well as a bigger involvement of rail freight transport. Although the rapid growth of the container transport in recent years clearly declined because of the global recession in 2009, no fundamental changes are expected, as shown by current developments (and forecasts). The quantities which have to be dealt with are rising again (and continue to rise), even if with a temporal lag, so that there is still need for action, especially concerning the linking of seaport container terminals with the hinterland.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Alicke K (2002) Modelling and optimization of the intermodal terminal mega hub. OR Spectrum 24:1–17
Anonymous (2008) Prognose der deutschlandweiten Verkehrsverflechtung – Seeverkehrsprognose (Los 3). Gutachten (Planco), Bundesministeriums für Verkehr, Bau und Stadtentwicklung, Duisburg
Baird AJ (2007) The economics of motorways of the sea. Maritime Policies & Management 34:287–310
Belter B, Fricke E (2008) Nutzen für Häfen und Bahnen – Das Projekt Masterplan Seehafenhinterlandanbindung. ETR Eisenbahntechnische Rundschau 57:174–177
Bostel N, Dejax P (1998) Models and algorithms for container allocation problems on trains in a rapid transshipment shunting yard. Transportation Science 32:370–379
Breimeier R (2009) Netzentwicklung der Eisenbahn für den Hinterlandverkehr der deutschen Nordseehäfen. ZEVrail 133:200–209
Paixão Casaca AC, Marlow PB (2009) Logistics strategies for short sea shipping operating as part of multimodal transport chains. Maritime Policy & Management 36:1–19
Charles L (2008) Sea-river shipping competitiveness and its geographical market area for the Rhône-Saône corridor. Journal of Transport Geography 16:100–116
Daduna JR (2005) Einsatz von Flottenmanagementsystemen zur Überwachung und Steuerung logistischer Prozesse. logistik management 7(4):45–63
Daduna JR (2009) Verkehrsträgerwettbewerb im Güterverkehr – Eine Scheindiskussion? In: Voß S, Pahl J, Schwarze S (eds) Logistik Management – Systeme, Methoden, Integration, Physica, Heidelberg, pp 247–260
Dellmann T, Berger A (2006) Autonomie und Automation der Eisenbahn im Kontext der Verkehrstechnik. ETR Einsenbahntechnische Rundschau 55:233–240
Dimitrijevic B, Spasovic LN (2006) Providing Linkages between Port Terminals and Inland Freight Distribution Facilities. Contribution to METRANs National Urban Freight Conference (Long Beach)
Eickmann C, Kohlruss J, Schumann T (2008) Hinterlandanbindung – Sinnvolle Koordination von Maßnahmen im Schienenverkehr zur Bewältigung des zu erwartenden Verkehrsaufkommens. Gutachten (Abschlussbericht), Deutsches Zentrum für Luft- und Raumfahrt (DLR), Köln
Fremont A (2007) Global maritime networks – the case of maersk. Journal of Transport Geography 15:431–442
Gardiner N (ed) (2009a) Annual Review of Global Container Terminal Operators 2009. Drewry Publishing, London
Gardiner N (ed) (2009b) Container Market 2009/10 – Annual Review and Forecast. Drewry Publishing, London
Guy E, Alix Y (2007) A successful upriver port? container shipping in Montréal. Journal of Transport Geography 15:46–55
Heymann E (2006) Containerschifffahrt – Überkapazitäten trotz steigender Nachfrage programmiert. Aktuelle Themen 347, Deutsche Bank Research, Frankfurt am Main
IAPH [International Association of Ports and Harbors] (2010) World Container Traffic. http://www.iaphworldports.org/world_port_info/statistics.html, accessed 05 Jun 2010
Ickert L, Matthes U, Rommerskirchen S, Weyand E, Schlesinger M, Limbers J (2007) Abschätzung der langfristigen Entwicklung des Güterverkehrs in Deutschland bis 2050. Gutachten (progtrans AG), Bundesministeriums für Verkehr, Bau und Stadtentwicklung, Berlin
James KA, Gurol S (2006) Urban Maglev Freight Container Movement at the Ports of Los Angeles / Long Beach. METRANS Transportation Center (ed), Online Publication: http://www.metrans.org/nuf/documents/KenJames.pdf, California, 20 pp
Jaržemskis A, Vasisliaukas AV (2007) Research on dryport concept as intermodal node. Transport 22:207–213
Keppel A (2010) Finanzierungsmodelle auch für Bedarfsmaßnahmen der Schiene. EI – Der Eisenbahningenieur 61(5):33–36
Kücükay F, Haney D (2004) Assistenzsysteme in der Fertigungstechnik (Braunschweig). In: Gesamtzentrum fr Verkehr Braunschweig (ed) Proceedings of the Conference on Automatisierungs- und Assistenzsysteme ür Transportmittel, pp 123–143
Lahl U (2007) Chancen für eine nachhaltige Hafenentwicklung. PPP Infrastructure 2(3+4):13–14
Limbourg S (2007) Planification strategique de Systemes de Transport de Marchandises en Europe – Modèles de Localisations optimales de Hubs de Conteneurs sur un Rèseau multimodal. These de doctorat, Falcultès Universitaires Catholiques de Mons, Mons
Mairhofer F (2003) CargoMover – Das Mobilitätskonzept von Siemens für einen Güterverkehr mit Zukunft. In: Verein Deutscher Ingenieure (VDI) (ed) Gesamtverkehrsforum 2003, VDI Verlag, Düsseldorf, pp 287–295
Mansfeld W (ed) (2004) Satellitenortung und Navigation. 2. Aufl. Vieweg, Braunschweig
Müller M, Schönknecht A (2005) Kapitalrendite bei Großcontainerschiffen. Internationales Verkehrswesen 57:377–379
Notteboom TE (2004) Container shipping and ports – an overview. Review of Network Economics 3(2):86–106
Notteboom TE (2007) Inland waterway transport of containerised cargo – from infancy to a fully-fledged transport mode. Journal of Maritime Research 4(2):63–80
Notteboom TE (2009) Relationships between Seaports and the Intermodal Hinterland in Light of Global Supply Chains – European Challenges. In: OECD / ITF (ed) Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development, pp 25–76
Panayides PM, Song DW (2008) Evaluating the integration of seaport container terminals in supply chains. International Journal of Physical Distribution and Logistics Management 38:562–584
Rosa A, Roscelli R (2009) Innovative Ideas and Design of an Integrated Dry Port and Sea Port System. In: United Nations Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific (ESCAP) (ed) Transport and Communications Bulletin for Asia and the Pacific 78 (Development of Dry Ports), pp 57–72
Roso V (2008) Factors influencing implementation of a dry port. International Journal of Physical Distribution and Logistics Management 38:782–798
Roso V, Woxenius J, Lumsden K (2009) The dry port concept – connecting container seaports with the hinterland. Journal of Transport Geography 17:338–345
Rudolf III CD (2007) Ship-to-shore productivity – can it keep up with mega-ship size increases? (part 1). Port Technology International 34:78–83
Sànchez RJ, Wilmsmeier G (2005) Short-sea shipping potentials in Central America to bridge infrastructural gaps. Maritime Policy & Management 32:227–244
Schönemann R (2010) Schienengüterverkehr an der Schnittstelle zum Seeschiff. Internationales Verkehrswesen 62(4):30–35
Siegmann J, Heidmeier S (2005) Improved Quality of Rail Freight Service by Using Self-Propelled Freight Wagons. In: Konings R, Priemus H, Nijkamp P (eds) The Future of Automated Freight Transport, Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham, pp 35–50
Slack B (1999) Satellite terminals – a local solution to hub congestion? Journal of Transport Geography 7:241–246
Slack B (2007) The Terminalisation of Seaports. In: Wang, J and Olivier, D and Notteboom, T and Slack, B (ed) Ports, Cities and Global Supply Chains, Ashgate, Farnham, pp 41–50
Stahlbock R, , Voß S (2008) Operations research at container terminals – a literature update. OR Spectrum 30:1–52
Steenken D, Voß S, Stahlbock R (2004) Container terminal operation and operation research – a classification and literature review. OR Spectrum 26:3–49
Stenvert R, Penfold A (2007) Container Port Strategy – Emerging Issues. Study, Ocean Shipping Consultants, Ocean House
Van Der Horst MR, de Langen PW (2008) Coordination in hinterland transport chains – a major challenge for the seaport community. Maritime Economics & Logistics 10:108–129
Wiegmans BW, Van Der Hoest A, Notteboom TE (2008) Port and terminal selection by deep-sea container operators. Maritime Policy & Management 35:517–534
Zhang J, Ioannou PH, Chassiakos A (2006) Intelligent Transportation System for Container Movement between Inland Port and Terminals. METRANS Transportation Center (ed), Online Publication: http://www.metrans.org/nuf/documents/Zhang.pdf, California, 27 pp
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2011 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Daduna, J.R. (2011). Importance of Hinterland Transport Networks for Operational Efficiency in Seaport Container Terminals. In: Böse, J. (eds) Handbook of Terminal Planning. Operations Research/Computer Science Interfaces Series, vol 49. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-8408-1_19
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-8408-1_19
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4419-8407-4
Online ISBN: 978-1-4419-8408-1
eBook Packages: Business and EconomicsBusiness and Management (R0)