Numerical Illustrations to Part II

  • Ingvar LindgrenEmail author
Part of the Springer Series on Atomic, Optical, and Plasma Physics book series (SSAOPP, volume 63)


In this chapter, we shall give some numerical illustrations of the three QED methods described in Part II, the S-matrix, the two-times Green’s function, and the covariant-evolution-operator methods.


Feynman Diagram Vacuum Polarization Lamb Shift Virtual Pair Atomic Hartree Unit 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. 1.
    Artemyev, A.N., Shabaev, V.M., Yerokhin, V.A., Plunien, G., Soff, G.: QED calculations of the n =1 and n =2 energy levels in He-like ions. Phys. Rev. A 71, 062,104 (2005)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Åsén, B.: QED effects in excited states of helium-like ions. Ph.D. thesis, Department of Physics, Chalmers University of Technology and University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden (2002)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Åsén, B., Salomonson, S., Lindgren, I.: Two-photon exchange QED effects in the 1s2s  1 S and 3 S states of heliumlike ions. Phys. Rev. A 65, 032,516 (2002)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Beier, T., Djekic, S., Häffner, H., Indelicato, P., Kluge, H.J., Quint, W., Shabaev, V.S., Verdu, J., Valenzuela, T., Werth, G., Yerokhin, V.A.: Determination of electron’s mass from g-factor experiments on 12 C +5 and 16 O +7. Nucl. Instrum. Methods 205, 15–19 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Beier, T., Häffner, H., Hermanspahn, N., Karshenboim, S.G., Kluge, H.J.: New Determination of the Electron’s Mass. Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 011,603.1–4 (2002)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Beier, T., Lindgren, I., Persson, H., Salomonson, S., Sunnergren, P., Häffner, H., Hermanspahn, N.: g j factor of an electron bound in a hydrogenlike ion. Phys. Rev. A 62, 032,510 (2000)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Blundell, S.: Calculations of the screened self-energy and vacuum polarization in Li-like, Na-like, and Cu-like ions. Phys. Rev. A 47, 1790–1803 (1993)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Blundell, S., Mohr, P.J., Johnson, W.R., Sapirstein, J.: Evaluation of two-photon exchange graphs for highly charged heliumlike ions. Phys. Rev. A 48, 2615–26 (1993)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Blundell, S., Snyderman, N.J.: Basis-set approach to calculating the radiative self-energy in highly ionized atoms. Phys. Rev. A 44, R1427–30 (1991)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Blundell, S.A.: Accurate screened QED calculations in high-Z many-electron ions. Phys. Rev. A 46, 3762–75 (1992)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Blundell, S.A., Cheng, K.T., Sapirstein, J.: Radiative corrections in atomic physics in the presence of perturbing potentials. Phys. Rev. A 55, 1857–65 (1997)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Borbely, J.S., George, M.C., Lombardi, L.D., Weel, M., Fitzakerley, D.W., Hessels, E.A.:. Phys. Rev. A 79, 060,503 (2009)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Brown, G.E., Langer, J.S., Schaeffer, G.W.: Lamb shift of a tightly bound electron. I. Method. Proc. R. Soc. London, Ser. A 251, 92–104 (1959)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Brown, G.E., Mayers, D.F.: Lamb shift of a tightly bound electron. II. Calculation for the K-electron in Hg. Proc. R. Soc. London, Ser. A 251, 105–109 (1959)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Cheng, T.K., Johnson, W.R., Sapirstein, J.: Screend Lamb-shift calculations for Lithiumlike Uranium, Sodiumlike Platimun, and Copperlike Gold. Phys. Rev. Lett. 23, 2960–63 (1991)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Clarke, J.J., van Wijngaaren, W.A.:. Phys. Rev. A 67, 12,506 (2003)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Curdt, W., Landi, E., Wilhelm, K., Feldman, U.: Wavelength measurements of heliumlike 1s2s 3 S 1 − 1s2p 2 P 0,2 transitions in Ne 8+ , Na 9+ , Mg 10+ , and Si 12+ emitted by solar flare plasmas. Phys. Rev. A 62, 022,502.1–7 (2000)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Desiderio, A.M., Johnson, W.R.: Lamb Shift and Binding Energies of K Electrons in Heavy Atoms. Phys. Rev. A 3, 1267–75 (1971)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    DeVore, T.R., Crosby, D.N., Myers, E.G.: Improved Measurement of the 1s2s  1 S 0 − 1s2p  3 P 1 Interval in Heliumlike Silicon. Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 243,001 (2008)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Drake, G.W.F.: Theoretical energies for the n = 1 and 2 states of the helium isoelectronic sequence up to Z = 100. Can. J. Phys. 66, 586–611 (1988)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    George, M.C., Lombardi, L.D., Hessels, E.A.: Precision Microwave Measurement of the 2  3 P 1 − 2  3 P 0 Interval in Atomic Helium: A determination of the Fine-Structure Constant. Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 173,002 (2001)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Giusfredi, G., Pastor, P.C., Natale, P.D., Mazzotti, D., deMauro, C., Fallani, L., Hagel, G., Krachmalnicoff, V., Ingusio, M.: Present status of the fine structure of the 2  3 P helium level. Can. J. Phys. 83, 301–10 (2005)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Grotsch, H.:. Phys. Rev. Lett. 24, 39 (1970)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Häffner, H., Beier, T., Hermanspahn, N., Kluge, H.J., Quint, W., Stahl, S., Verdú, J., Werth, G.: High-Acuuracy Measurements of the Magnetic Anomaly of the Electron Bound in Hydrogenlike Carbon. Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 5308–11 (2000)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Indelicato, P., Gorciex, O., Desclaux, J.P.: Multiconfiguration Dirac-Fock studies of two-electron ions: II. Radiative corrections and comparison with experiment. J. Phys. B 20, 651–63 (1987)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Jentschura, U.D., Mohr, P.J., Soff, G.: Calculation of the Electron Self-Energy for Low Nuclear Charge. Phys. Rev. Lett. 61, 53–56 (1999)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Jentschura, U.D., Mohr, P.J., Tan, J.N., Wundt, B.J.: Fundamental Constants and Tests of Theory in Rydberg States of Hydrogenlike Ions. Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 160,404 (2008)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Kukla, K.W., Livingston, A.E., Suleiman, J., Berry, H.G., Dunford, R.W., Gemmel, D.S., Kantor, E.P., Cheng, S., Curtis, L.J.: Fine-structure energies for the 1s2s  3 S − 1s2p  3 P transition in heliumlike Ar +. Phys. Rev. A 51, 1905–17 (1995)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Lindgren, I., Åsén, B., Salomonson, S., Mårtensson-Pendrill, A.M.: QED procedure applied to the quasidegenerate fine-structure levels of He-like ions. Phys. Rev. A 64, 062,505 (2001)Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Lindgren, I., Persson, H., Salomonson, S., Labzowsky, L.: Full QED calculations of two-photon exchange for heliumlike systems: Analysis in the Coulomb and Feynman gauges. Phys. Rev. A 51, 1167–1195 (1995)Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Lindgren, I., Persson, H., Salomonson, S., Ynnerman, A.: Bound-state self-energy calculation using partial-wave renormalization. Phys. Rev. A 47, R4555–58 (1993)Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Lindgren, I., Salomonson, S., Åsén, B.: The covariant-evolution-operator method in bound-state QED. Physics Reports 389, 161–261 (2004)Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Marrs, R.E., Elliott, S.R., Stöhkler, T.: Measurement of two-electron contributions to the ground-state energy of heliumlike ions. Phys. Rev. A 52, 3577–85 (1995)Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Mohr, P.: Self-energy correction to one-electron energy levels in a strong Coulomb field. Phys. Rev. A 46, 4421–24 (1992)Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Mohr, P., Taylor, B.: CODATA recommended values of the fundamental constants 2002. Rev. Mod. Phys. 77, 1–107 (2005)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Mohr, P., Taylor, B.: CODATA recommended values of the fundamental constants 2002. Rev. Mod. Phys. (2008)Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Mohr, P., Taylor, B.N.: CODATA recommended values of the fundamental physical constants: 1998. Rev. Mod. Phys. 72, 351–495 (2000)ADSzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Mohr, P.J.: Numerical Evaluation of the 1s 1∕2 -State Radiative Level Shift. Ann. Phys. (N.Y.) 88, 52–87 (1974)Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Mohr, P.J.: Self-Energy Radiative Corrections. Ann. Phys. (N.Y.) 88, 26,52 (1974)Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Mohr, P.J.: Lamb Shift in a Strong Coulomb Field. Phys. Rev. Lett. 34, 1050–52 (1975)Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Mohr, P.J.: Self-energy of the n = 2 states in a strong Coulomb field. Phys. Rev. A 26, 2338–54 (1982)Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Mohr, P.J.: Quantum electrodynamics of high-Z few-electron atoms. Phys. Rev. A 32, 1949–57 (1985)Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Mohr, P.J., Plunien, G., Soff, G.: QED corrections in heavy atoms. Physics Reports 293, 227–372 (1998)Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Mohr, P.J., Sapirstein, J.: Evaluation of two-photon exchange graphs for excited states of highly charged heliumlike ions. Phys. Rev. A 62, 052,501.1–12 (2000)Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Mohr, P.J., Soff, G.: Nuclear Size Correction to the Electron Self Energy. Phys. Rev. Lett. 70, 158–161 (1993)Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Myers, E.G., Margolis, H.S., Thompson, J.K., Farmer, M.A., Silver, J.D., Tarbutt, M.R.: Precision Measurement of the 1s2p  3 P 2 3 P 1 Fine Structure Interval in Heliumlike Fluorine. Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 4200–03 (1999)Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Myers, E.G., Tarbutt, M.R.: Measurement of the 1s2p 3 P 0 3 P 1 fine structure interval in heliumlike magnesium. Phys. Rev. A 61, 010,501R (1999)Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Persson, H., Labzowsky, I.L.L.N., Plunien, G., Beier, T., Soff, G.: Second-order self-energy–vacuum-polarization contributions to the Lamb shift in highly charged few-electron ions. Phys. Rev. A 54, 2805–13 (1996)Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Persson, H., Lindgren, I., Salomonson, S., Sunnergren, P.: Accurate vacuum-polarization calculations. Phys. Rev. A 48, 2772–78 (1993)Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    Persson, H., Salomonson, S., Sunnergren, P., Lindgren, I.: Two-electron Lamb-Shift Calculations on Heliumlike Ions. Phys. Rev. Lett. 76, 204–07 (1996)Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    Persson, H., Salomonson, S., Sunnergren, P., Lindgren, I.: Radiative corrections to the electron g-factor in H-like ions. Phys. Rev. A 56, R2499–2502 (1997)Google Scholar
  52. 52.
    Plante, D.R., Johnson, W.R., Sapirstein, J.: Relativistic all-order many-body calculations of the n = 1 and n = 2 states of heliumlike ions. Phys. Rev. A 49, 3519–30 (1994)Google Scholar
  53. 53.
    Riis, E., Sinclair, A.G., Poulsen, O., Drake, G.W.F., Rowley, W.R.C., Levick, A.P.: Lamb shifts and hyperfine structure in 6 Li + and 7 Li + : Theory and experiment. Phys. Rev. A 49, 207–20 (1994)Google Scholar
  54. 54.
    Schweppe, J., Belkacem, A., Blumenfield, L., Clayton, N., Feinberg, B., Gould, H., Kostroun, V.E., Levy, L., Misawa, S., Mowat, J.R., Prior, M.H.: Measurement of the Lamb Shift in Lithiumlike Uranium (U +89). Phys. Rev. Lett. 66, 1434–37 (1991)Google Scholar
  55. 55.
    Sthöhlker, T., Beyer, H.F., Gumberidze, A., Kumar, A., Liesen, D., Reuschl, R., Spillmann, U., Trassinelli, M.: Ground state Lamb-shift of heavy hydrogen-like ions: status and prspectives. Hyperfine Interactions 172, 135–40 (2006)Google Scholar
  56. 56.
    Stöhlker, T., Mokler, P.H., et al., K.B.: Ground-state Lamb Shift for Hydrogenlike Uranium Measured at the ESR Storage Ring. Phys. Rev. Lett. 14, 2184–87 (1993)Google Scholar
  57. 57.
    Yerokhin, K.P.V.A.: Fine Structure of Heliumlike Ions and Determination of the Fine Structure Constant. Phys. Rev. Lett. 104, 70,403 (2010)Google Scholar
  58. 58.
    Yerokhin, V.A., Artemyev, A.N., Shabaev, V.M., Sysak, M.M., Zherebtsov, O.M., Soff, G.: Evaluation of the two-photon exchange graphs for the \(2{p}_{1/2} - 2s\) transition in Li-like Ions. Phys. Rev. A 64, 032,109.1–15 (2001)Google Scholar
  59. 59.
    Yerokhin, V.A., Indelicato, P., Shabaev, V.M.: Self-energy Corrections to the Bound-Electron g Factor in H-like Ions. Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 134,001 (2002)Google Scholar
  60. 60.
    Yerokhin, V.A., Indelicato, P., Shabaev, V.M.: Two-Loop Self-Energy Correction in High-Z Hydrogenlike Ions. Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 073,001 (2003)Google Scholar
  61. 61.
    Yerokhin, V.A., Indelicato, P., Shabaev, V.M.: Evaluation of the self-energy correction to the g Factor of S states in H-like Ions. Phys. Rev. A 69, 052,203 (2004)Google Scholar
  62. 62.
    Zelevinsky, T., Farkas, D., Gabrielse, G.: Precision Measurement of the Three 2 3 P J Helium Fine Structure Intervals. Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 203,001 (2005)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PhysicsUniversity of GothenburgGöteborgSweden

Personalised recommendations