Skip to main content

Non-deterministic Analysis Systems (NDAS)

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Analysis of Engineering Drawings and Raster Map Images
  • 1049 Accesses

Abstract

As described in Chap. 1, traditional approaches to drawing analysis follow the process sequence of digitization, noise removal, segmentation, vectorization, recognition of text and graphics, extraction of dimension sets, and semantic analysis using some form of rules. Typically, fixed thresholds are used for each step in the process. As an example of how this process would work ideally, consider the drawing shown in Fig. 4.2. The results of text extraction are shown in Fig. 5.1; Figure 5.2 shows pointer rays from dimension sets; Fig. 5.3 shows pointer lines; Fig. 5.4 shows the circles found in the drawing; Fig. 5.5 shows boxes; and Figs. 5.6–5.9 show the dimension sets in the drawing.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    This chapter is contributed by Lavanya Swaminathan based on her MS thesis.

Bibliography

  1. N. Asher and L. Vieu. Toward a Geometry of Common Sense: A Semantics and a Complete Axiomatization of Mereotopology. In Proceedings the International Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Montreal, Canada, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  2. H. Blum. Biological Shape and Visual Science. Jnl. of Theoretical Biology, 38:205–287, 1973.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. N. Carriero and D. Gelernter. How to Write Parallel Programs. MIT Press, Cambridge, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  4. D.E. Catlin. Estimation, Control, and the Discrete Kalman Filter. Springer Verlag, New York, 1989.

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. S. Collin and D. Colnet. Syntactic Analysis of Technical Drawing Dimensions. International Journal of Pattern Recognition and Artificial Intelligence, 8(5):1131–1148, 1994.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. D. Dori. A Syntactic/Geometric Approach to Recognition of Dimensions in Engineering Drawings. Computer Vision, Graphics and Image Processing, 47:271–291, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  7. D. Dori and A. Pnueli. The Grammar of Dimensions in Machine Drawings. Computer Vision, Graphics and Image Processing, 42:1–18, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Standard Upper Ontology Knowledge Interchange Format. see the formal standards document at http://suo.ieee.org/suo-kif.html.

  9. B. Grocholsky, A. Makarenko, T. Kaupp, and H. Durrant-Whyte. Scalable Control of Decentralised Sensor Platforms. In Proceedings of Information Processing in Sensor Networks, pages 96–112, Palo Alto, CA, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  10. A. Habed and B. Boufama. Dimension Sets in Technical Drawings. In Proceedings of Vision Interface, pages 217–223, Trios-Rivieres, CA, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  11. T.C. Henderson. Explicit and Persistent Knowledge in Engineering Drawing Analysis. Research Report UUCS-03-018, School of Computing, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, October 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  12. T.C. Henderson and L. Swaminathan. Form Analysis with the Nondeterministic Agent System (NDAS). In Proceedings of 2003 Symposium on Document Image Understanding Technology, pages 253–258, April 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  13. T.C. Henderson and L. Swaminathan. NDAS: The Nondeterministic Agent System for Engineering Drawing Analysis. In Proceedings Intl Conference on Integration of Knowledge Intensive Multi-agent Systems, pages 512–516, Boston, MA, October 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  14. I. Niles and A. Pease. Towards a Standard Upper Ontology. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Formal Ontology and Information Systems, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  15. I. Pratt and O. Lemon. Ontologies for Plane, Polygonal Mereotopology. Technical Report UMCS-97-1-1, University of Manchester, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  16. V.S. Subrahmanian. Heterogeneous Agent Systems. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  17. L. Swaminathan. Agent-Based Engineering Drawing Analysis. Master’s thesis, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, May 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  18. A. Tarski. Foundations of the Geometry of Solids. In Logic, Semantics, Mathematics, pages 24–30, Oxford, UK, 1956. Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  19. G. Weiss. Multi-Agent Systems. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  20. P. Winston. Artificial Intelligence. Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA, 1984.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Henderson, T.C. (2014). Non-deterministic Analysis Systems (NDAS). In: Analysis of Engineering Drawings and Raster Map Images. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-8167-7_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-8167-7_5

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4419-8166-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4419-8167-7

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics