Advertisement

The Archaic World Picture

  • Dirk L. Couprie
Chapter
Part of the Astrophysics and Space Science Library book series (ASSL, volume 374)

Abstract

The archaic world picture, the picture of a flat earth with the dome of the heaven vaulted above it, on which the celestial bodies are attached, is the basic world picture of many ancient cultures. Here “world picture” means the conception of the visible universe, not including all kinds of mythical or religious representations of what was imagined to be “under the earth.” This archaic world picture (and also its penetration by a curious head) is beautifully rendered in a picture that is often thought to belong to the Renaissance period but was actually drawn in 1888 A.D. on the instructions of the famous French astronomer and popularizer Camille Flammarion (Fig. 1.1). The drawing refers to a story about Archytas (428–347 B.C.), who is supposed to have asked whether it would be possible to put a hand or a stick out of the heavens (DK 47A24). We will return to the implications of this question in the last chapter of this book.

Keywords

Celestial Body World Picture Visible Universe Renaissance Period Flat Earth 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Andrae, W. 1933. Die Ionische Säule. Bauform oder Symbol? Berlin: Verlag für Kunstwissenschaft.Google Scholar
  2. Balls, Heinrich. 1949. Antike Astronomie. München: Ernst Heimeran Verlag.Google Scholar
  3. Dicks, D.R. 1970. Early Greek Astronomy to Aristotle. Ithaca, NY: Thames and Hudson.Google Scholar
  4. Dreyer, John L.E. 1953. A History of Astronomy from Thales to Kepler. New York: Dover Publications, Inc. (Facs. reprint of: History of the Planetary Systems from Thales to Kepler. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1905).zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  5. Fehling, Detlev. 1985b. Das Problem der Geschichte des griechischen Weltmodells vor Aristoteles. Rheinisches Museum für Philologie 128: 195–231.Google Scholar
  6. Keith, Arthur B. 1917. Indian Mythology. In Louis H. Gray and George F. Moore, eds., Vol. VI: The Mythology of All Races. Boston: (reprint New York 1964).Google Scholar
  7. Piankoff, Alexandre and Natacha Rabova-Valentino. 1957. Mythological Papyri. In Two Parts. New York: Pantheon Books.Google Scholar
  8. Pindar. 1997. The Odes and Selected Fragments, Vol II: Olympian Odes, Pythian Odes. William H. Race, ed. and transl., Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Schäfer, Heinrich. 1928. Ägyptische Kunst und Heutige Kunst und Weltgebäude der Alten Ägypter, Zwei Aufsätze. Berlin/Leipzig: Vwerlag von Walter de Gruyter & Co.Google Scholar
  10. Theognis. 1979. In T. Hudson-Williams, ed., The Elegies of Theognis and Other Elegies in the Theognidean Sylloge. New York: Arno Press.Google Scholar
  11. Thurston, Hugh. 1994. Early Astronomy. New York: Springer Verlag.Google Scholar
  12. Van Wolde, Ellen J. 2009. Why the Verb ברא Does Not Mean ‘to Create’ in Genesis 1.1-2.4a. Journal for the Study of the Old Testament 34: 3–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Weeks, Kent R. 2005. The Treasures of Luxor and the Valley of the Kings. Italy: White Star Spa.Google Scholar
  14. Wells, Ronald A. 1992. The Mythology of Nut and the Birth of Ra. Studien zur altägyptischen Kultur 19: 305–321.Google Scholar
  15. Wells, Ronald A. 1997. Astronomy in Egypt. In Christopher Walker, ed., Astronomy Before the Telescope, 28–40. London: British Museum Press.Google Scholar
  16. Flammarion, Camille. 1888. L’Atmosphère: météorologie populaire. Paris: Librairie Hachette et Cie.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Dirk L. Couprie
    • 1
  1. 1.MaastrichtNetherlands

Personalised recommendations