Abstract
Our global village is fast changing with astronomical growth in virtual communication and physical movement of millions of people for leisure as well as work. The shrinking of the globe calls for a better understanding of each other, and we can do this by learning how each of us operates in our unique cultural space. In this chapter, I present three reasons for, or imperatives of, doing indigenous research. I posit that there are two ways of doing meaningful cultural research in large populous countries such as China, India, Indonesia, Brazil, Nigeria, Mexico, and so forth. First, we can start with the cross-cultural theories and test them in the context of these countries. This approach is better than the pseudoetic approach in which people invariably start with Western models developed in USA, Canada, and other European countries. Second, we can start with indigenous ideas to develop models and then examine the cross-cultural theories and Western ideas in light of these indigenous models (Bhawuk, 2008a, b). I present examples of both these approaches. It is hoped that researchers will pause to reflect on the mindless copying of Western ideas and start paying attention to indigenous ideas in psychology, for at best, the borrowed Western models of psychology can confuse rather than help in understanding social and organizational behavior in these populous countries. I propose that researchers put a moratorium on pseudoetic research that leads to the mindless copying of Western ideas and start paying attention to indigenous ideas in psychology that can be found in many of these non-Western countries. Psychological research in India is used to exemplify the general ideas presented in the chapter.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
World’s 50 Most Populous Countries 2009: https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/rankorder/2119rank.html?countryName=Germany&countryCode=gm®ionCode=eu&rank=15#gm.
- 2.
Internet Usage Statistics: http://www.internetworldstats.com/stats.htm.
- 3.
Internet and telephone was shut down in Nepal on February 1, 2005, by King Gyanendra when he assumed control of state power by dissolving the government and declaring a state of emergency. http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/1482509/Nepal-shuts-down-after-king-declares-state-of-emergency.html. Similarly, on September 29, 2007, the military government of Myanmar shut down internet. http://opennet.net/research/bulletins/013.
- 4.
Tourism Highlights 2009 Edition: http://www.unwto.org (Facts and Figures Section).
- 5.
Opening address of H.E. Mr. Ban Ki-Moon, Secretary General of the United Nations, at the 3rd Global Forum on Migration and Development, Athens, Νovember 4, 2009. http://www.un.org/esa/population/migration/Opening_remarks_SG_Athens.pdf.
- 6.
Thomas Brinkhoff: The Principal Agglomerations of the World, http://www.citypopulation.de.
- 7.
This idea was presented by Sir Arthur Lewis in his article in 1954, which started a huge debate in economics. The soundness of his idea has held up over the years, and he won the Nobel Prize in 1979 (shared with Theodore W. Schultz). People in rural areas are likely to be socialized with the traditional worldview and would bring such cultural imprints with them. Thus, unlimited supply of culture is associated with the unlimited supply of human resources moving from rural to urban areas, bringing traditional culture to the global mix of cultures. For example, extended family, arranged marriage, and so forth are still the norm for most people in rural India, which has both social and work-related consequences.
- 8.
This economic indicator is a per capita ratio of Gross Domestic Product and Purchasing Power Parity, which captures the value of all final goods and services produced within a nation in a given year divided by the average population for the same year. It allows for a meaningful comparison of the economy of countries. GDP/PPP per Capita information for 2006 provided by the World Bank in terms of 2005 Dollar and is taken from: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_GDP_(PPP)_per_capita.
- 9.
The kinship terms often differentiate on both sides of the family and also mark age and gender explicitly. Here are relationship words in Telugu, a southern language of India. Father: nanna, trandri; mother: amma, thalli; brother: anna, tammudu; sister: akka, chelli; uncle: menamama, mamayya, babai, chinnana; aunt: pinni, peddammma, atta; grandfather: tata; grandmother, ammama, nanamma; husband: bartha, mogudu; wife: braya, pellam; brother-in-Law: bava, bammaridi; sister-in-law: vadina, maradalu; niece: menakodalu; nephew: menalludu; relative: bandhuvu; friend: snehitudu; guest: athidhi.
- 10.
A colleague from Turkey told me that reviewers of a major American journal rejected her paper because her data were from Turkey. The same study with US data would be acceptable, but with data from Turkey was not acceptable. Such restrictive gate keeping by reviewers and editors forces researchers to stay with the Western constructs and to follow the pseudoetic research paradigm.
References
Albanese R., & Van Fleet D. D. (1985). Rational behavior in groups: The free-riding tendency. Academy of Management Review, 10, 244–255.
Allwood, C. M., & Berry, J. W. (2006). Origins and development of indigenous psychologies: An international analysis. International Journal of Psychology, 41 (4), 243–268.
Beattie, J. (1980). Review article: Representations of the self in traditional Africa. Africa, 50(3), 313–320.
Bhagwati, J. (1988). Protectionism. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.
Bhagwati, J. (2004). In defense of Globalization. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Bhawuk, D. P. S. (1997). Leadership through Relationship Management: Using the Theory of Individualism and Collectivism. In R. W. Brislin & K. Cushner (Eds.), Improving intercultural interactions: Modules for cross-cultural training programs, Volume 2, pp. 40–56. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Bhawuk, D. P. S. (1999). Who Attains Peace: An Indian Model of Personal Harmony. Indian Psychological Review, 52 (2 & 3), 40–48.
Bhawuk, D. P. S. (2001a). Looking for the Silver Lining: Integrative Potentials in International Project Negotiation. Psychology and Developing Societies, 13 (2), 243–262.
Bhawuk, D. P. S. (2001b). Evolution of culture assimilators: Toward theory-based assimilators. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 25 (2), 141–163.
Bhawuk, D. P. S. (2003a). Culture’s Influence on Creativity: The Case of Indian Spirituality. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 27 (1), 1–22.
Bhawuk, D. P. S. (2004). Individualism and collectivism. In the Encyclopedia of Leadership, Volume 2, 706–710. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Bhawuk, D. P. S. (2008a). Science of Culture and Culture of Science: Worldview and Choice of Conceptual Models and Methodology. The Social Engineer, 11 (2), 26–43.
Bhawuk, D. P. S. (2008b). Globalization and Indigenous Cultures: Homogenization or Differentiation? International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 32 (4), 305–317.
Bhawuk, D. P. S., & Munusamy, V. (2006). Are high achieving Asians individualists? In Edith W. Chen and Glenn Omatsu (Eds.), Teaching about Asian Pacific Islanders: Effective Activities, Strategies, and Assignments for Classrooms and Workshops (pp. 95–102), Lanham, MD: AltaMira Press.
Bohra, K. A., & Pandey, J., (1984). Ingratiation toward different target persons: A stranger, a friend, and a boss. Journal of Social Psychology, 12 (2), 217–222.
Bontempo, R., & Rivero, J. C. (1992). Cultural variation in cognition: The role of self-concept in the attitude behavior link. Paper presented at the meetings of the American Management Association, Las Vegas, Nevada.
Chen, C. C., Meindl, J. R. and Hunt, R. G. (1997). Testing the effects of vertical and horizontal collectivism: A study of reward allocation preferences in China. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 28, 44–70
Clark, M. S., & Mills, J. (1979). Interpersonal attraction in exchange and communal relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 12–24.
Cohen, S. G., & Bailey, D. E. (1997). What makes teams work: Group effectiveness research from the shop floor to the executive suite. Journal of Management, 23, 239–290.
Drucker, P. F. (1969). Age of Discontinuity. New York: Harper and Row.
Dunnette, M. D. & Hough, L. M. (Eds.). (1992). Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology (2nd edition) (Vol. 1–3). Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
Earley, P. C. (1989). Social loafing and collectivism: A comparison of the United States and the People’s Republic of China. Administrative Science Quarterly, 34, 565–581.
Erez, M., & Somech, A. (1996). Is group productivity loss the rule or the exception? Effects of culture and group-based motivation. Academy of Management Journal, 39, (6), 1513–1537.
Galtung, J. (1981). Structure, culture, and intellectual style: An essay comparing Saxonic, Teutonic, Gallic, and Nipponic approaches. Social Science Information, 20, 817–856.
Gelfand, M. J., Bhawuk, D. P. S., Nishii, L H., & Bechtold, D. J. (2004). Individualism and Collectivism. In House, R. J., Hanges, P. J., Javidan, M. J., Dorfman, P.W., Gupta, V. (Eds.), Culture, Leadership, and Organizations: The GLOBE, Study of 62 Societies (pp. 437–512). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Gergen, K., Gulerce, A., Lock, A., & Mishra, G. (1996). Psychological Science in cultural context. American Psychologist, 51, 496–503.
Graen, George B. & Wakabayashi, M. (1994). Cross-cultural leadership making: Bridging American and Japanese diversity for team advantage. In H. C. Triandis, M. D. Dunnette, & L. M. Hough (Eds.), Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology (2nd edition) (Vol. 4, pp. 415–446). Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
Guillén, M. F. (2001). Is Globalization Civilizing, Destructive or Feeble? A Critique of Five Key Debates in the Social-Science Literature.” Annual Review of Sociology 27, 235–260.
Hagelin, J. (1998). Manual for a perfect government. Fairfield, Iowa: Maharishi University of Management Press.
Han, G., & Park, B. (1995). Children’s choice in conflict: Application of the theory of individualism-collectivism. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 26 (3), 298–313
Hofstede G. (1980). Cultures Consequences. California: Sage.
Hofstede G. (2001). Cultures Consequences (2 nd ed.). California: Sage.
Holton, R. (2000). Globalization’s cultural consequences. Annals, AAPSS, 570, 140–152.
House, R. J., Hanges, P. J., Javidan, M. J., Dorfman, P.W., Gupta, V. (Eds.) (2004), Culture, Leadership, and Organizations: The GLOBE, Study of 62 Societies. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Hui, C. H., & Triandis, H. C. (1986). Individualism- collectivism: A study of cross cultural researchers. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 17, 225–248.
Hwang, K-K, (2004). The epistemological goal of indigenous psychology: The perspective of constructive realism. In Setiadi, B. N., Supratiknya, A., Lonner, W. J., and Poortinga, Y. H. (Eds.), On going themes in psychology and culture (pp. 169–185). Florida, USA: International Association for Cross-Cultural Psychology.
Inglehart, R. (1997). Modernization and postmodernization: Cultural, economic, & political change in 43 societies. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Iyengar, T. R. R. (1997). Hinduism and scientific quest. New Delhi, India: D. K. Printworld.
Jones, E. E. (1964). Ingratiation: A social psychological analysis. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
Jones, E. E., Gergen, K. J., & Jones, R. G. (1963). Tactics of ingratiation among leaders and subordinates in a status hierarchy. Psychological Monographs, 77, Whole Number 566.
Jones, E. E., & Wortman, C. (1973). Ingratiation: An attributional approach. Morristown, New Jersey: General Learning Corporation.
Kagitcibasi, C. (1994). A critical appraisal of individualism and collectivism: Toward a new formulation. In U. Kim, H. C. Triandis, C. Kagitcibasi, S. Choi, G. Yoon (Eds.), Individualism and collectivism: Theory, method, and applications (pp. 52–65). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
Kim, U. (1994). Individualism and collectivism: Conceptual clarification and elaboration. In U. Kim, H. C. Triandis, C. Kagitcibasi, S. Choi, G. Yoon (Eds.), Individualism and collectivism: Theory, method, and applications (pp. 19–40). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
Knickerbocker, B. (2007). World first: In 2008 most people will live in cities. The Christian Science Monitor, January 12, 2007.
Latane, B., Williams, K. D., & Harkins, S. (1979). Many hands make light the work: The causes and consequences of social loafing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 822–832
Levitt, T. (1983). The Globalization of Markets, Harvard Business Review, 61(3), 92–102.
Lewis, W. A. (1954). Economic development with unlimited supplies of labour. The Manchester School, 22 (2), 139–191.
Lie, J. (1996). Globalization and its discontents. Contemporary Sociology, 25, 585–587.
Likert, R. (1961). New patterns of management. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
Maples, M. F. (1988). Group development: Extending Tuckman’s theory. Journal for Specialists in Group Work, Fall, 17–23.
Markus, H. R., & Kitayama, S. (1991). Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychological Review, 98, 224–253.
Marsella, A. J. (1998). Toward a “Global-Community Psychology,” American Psychologist, 53 (12), 1282–1291.
Matsui, T., Kakuyama, T., & Onglatco, M. L. (1987). Effects of goals and feedback on performance in groups. Journal of Applied Psychology, 72, 407–415.
Mishra, G., Srivastava, A. K., & Mishra, I. (2006). Culture and facets of creativity: The Indian experience. In James C. Kaufman & Robert J. Sternberg (Eds.) International handbook of creativity (pp. 421–455). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Moon, B. K. (2009). Remarks to the Third Meeting of the Global Forum on Migration and Development (4 November – Athens, Greece)
Naisbitt, J., & Aburdene, P. (1990). Megatrends 2000. Basingstoke, Hants: PAN Books.
Osland, J., Kolb, D. A., & Rubin, I. M. (2001). Organizational behavior: An experiential approach (seventh edition). Englewood Cliff, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Pandey, J. (1978). Ingratiation: A review of literature and relevance of its study in organizational setting. Indian Journal of Industrial Relations, 13, 381–398.
Pandey, J. (1980). Ingratiation: as expected and manipulative behavior in Indian society. Social Change, 10, 15–17.
Pandey, J. (1988). Social influence process. In J. Pandey (Ed.), Psychology in India: The state of the art (volume 2) (pp. 55–93). New Delhi: Sage Publications.
Pandey, J. (Ed.) (2000) Psychology in India Revisited: Developments in the Discipline: Physiological Foundation and Human Cognition, (Vol. 1) New Delhi: Sage Publishers.
Pandey, J., & Bohra, K. A., (1986). Attraction and evaluation as the function of ingratiating style of a person. Social Behavior and Personality, 14 (1).
Pandey, J., & Kakkar, S. (1982). Cross-cultural differences and similarities in ingratiation tactics as social influence and control mechanism. In R. Rath, H. S. Asthana, D. Sinha, & J. B. P. Sinha (Eds.), Diversity and unity in cross-cultural psychology. Lisse: Swets & Zeitlinger, B.V.
Paranjpe, A. C. (1984). Theoretical psychology: The meeting of East and West. New York: Plenum Press.
Prasad, M. N. (1995). The Kena Upanishad. (Explanatory notes by the author). New Delhi, India: D. K. Printworld.
Rao, R. K., & Marwaha, S. B. (eds.) (2005). Toward a Spiritual psychology: Essays in Indian Psychology (pp. 229–249). New Delhi, India: Samvad Indian Foundation.
Rodrik, D. (1997). Sense and Nonsense in the Globalization Debate. Foreign Policy, 107, 19–37.
Schwartz, S. H. (1990). Individualism-collectivism: Critique and proposed refinements. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 21, 139–157.
Singelis, T. M., Triandis, H. C., Bhawuk, D. P. S., & Gelfand, M. (1995) Horizontal and vertical dimensions of individualism and collectivism: A theoretical and measurement refinement. Cross-Cultural Research, 29, 240–275.
Sinha, D. (1965). Integration of modern psychology with Indian thought. Journal of Humanistic Psychology, Spring, 6–21. Reprinted in A. J. Sutchi & M.A. Vick (Eds.), Readings in humanistic psychology (pp. 265–279). New York: Free Press.
Sinha, D., & Kao, H. S. R. (1988) (Eds.). Social values and development: Asian perspectives. New Delhi, India: Sage.
Sinha, J. (1933). Indian psychology (Volume 1 and 2). London, UK: Kegan Paul.
Sinha, J. B. P. (1980). The nurturant task leader. New Delhi: Concept Publishing House.
Swidler, A. (1986). Culture in Action: Symbols and Strategies.” American Sociological Review. 51: 273–286.
Targowski, A., & Metwalli, A. (2003). A framework for asymmetric communication among cultures. Dialogue & Universalism. 13(7/8), 49–67.
Toffler, A. (1970). Future Shocks. New York: Bantom Books.
Triandis, H. C. (1972). The analysis of subjective culture. New York: Wiley.
Triandis, H. C. (1989). The self and social behavior in differing cultural contexts. Psychological Review, 96, 506–520.
Triandis, H. C. (1990). Cross-cultural studies of individualism and collectivism. In J. Bremen (Ed.), Nebraska symposium on motivation, 1989 (pp. 41–133). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
Triandis, H. C. (1994a). Cross-cultural industrial and organizational psychology. In H. C. Triandis, M. D. Dunnette, & L. M. Hough (Eds.), Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology (2nd edition) (Vol. 4, pp. 103–172). Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
Triandis, H. C. (1995). Individualism and collectivism. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
Triandis, H. C., Bontempo, R., Villareal, M. J., Asai, M., & Lucas, N. (1988). Individualism and collectivism: Cross-cultural perspectives on self-ingroup relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 323–338.
Triandis, H. C., Chen, X. P., & Chan, D. K.-S. (1998). Scenarios for the measurement of collectivism and individualism. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 29, 275–289.
Triandis, H. C., & Gelfand, M. J. (1998). Converging measurement of horizontal and vertical individualism and collectivism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 118–128.
Triandis, H. C., Leung, K., Villareal, M., & Clark, F. L. (1985). Allocentric vs. idiocentric tendencies: Convergent and discriminant validation. Journal of Research in Personality, 19, 395–415.
Triandis, H. C., McCusker, C., & Hui, C. H. (1990). Multimethod probes of individualism and collectivism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 1006–1020.
Tuckman, B. W., & Jensen, M. C. (1977). Stages of small group development revisited. Group and Organizational Studies, 2, 419–427.
Vanucci, M. (1994). Ecological readings in the Veda: Matter-energy-life. New Delhi, India: D. K. Printworld.
Yang, K.S. (1997) Indigenizing Westernized Chinese Psychology. In M.H. Bond (Ed) Working at the Interface of Cultures: Eighteen Lives in Social Science (pp. 62–76). London: Routledge.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2011 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Bhawuk, D.P.S. (2011). The Global Need for Indigenous Psychology. In: Spirituality and Indian Psychology. International and Cultural Psychology. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-8110-3_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-8110-3_1
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4419-8109-7
Online ISBN: 978-1-4419-8110-3
eBook Packages: Behavioral ScienceBehavioral Science and Psychology (R0)