Skip to main content

Automated Staining: Dako Perspective

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 2571 Accesses

Abstract

Dako has been an industry leader developing automated staining instruments for decades. We have invited Dako to offer perspectives and insights on the past, present, and future of automated staining systems. Experts from Dako answer questions regarding what automation can and cannot provide, how automation can improve workflow and secure high staining quality, gains from connection to laboratory information systems, automated in situ hybridization assays, and the next steps in automation of staining and other processes in the pathology laboratory.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

References

  1. Moreau A, Neel TE, Joubert M. Approach to automation in immunohistochemistry. J Clin Chim Acta. 1998;278:177–84.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Boenisch T. Effect of heat-induced antigen retrieval following inconsistent formalin fixation. Appl Immunol Mol Morphol. 2005;13(3):283–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Shi S-R, Liu C, Taylor CR. Standardization of immunohistochemistry for formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue sections based on the antigen-retrieval technique: from experiments to hypothesis. J Histochem Cytochem. 2007;55(2):105–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Williams JH, Mapham BL, Wright DH. Tissue preparation for immunocytochemistry. J Clin Pathol. 1997;50:422–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Wolff AC, Hammond ME, Schwartz JN, et al. American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists guideline recommendations for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 testing in breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25(1):118–45.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. García-Caballero T, Grabau D, Green AR, et al. Determination of HER2 amplification in primary breast cancer using dual-color chromogenic in situ hybridization is comparable to fluorescence in situ hybridization: a European multicenter study involving 168 specimens. Histopathology. 2010;56(4):472–80.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Hoff K, Jørgensen JT, Müller S, et al. Visualization of FISH Probes by dual-color chromogenic in situ hybridization. Am J Clin Pathol. 2009;133(2):205–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Pedersen M, Rasmussen BB. The correlation between dual-color chromogenic in situ hybridization and fluorescence in situ hybridization in assessing HER2 gene amplification in breast cancer. Diagn Mol Pathol. 2009;18(2):96–102.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Tanner M, Gancberg D, Di Leo A, et al. Chromogenic in situ hybridization: a practical alternative for fluorescence in situ hybridization to detect HER-2/neu oncogene amplification in archival breast cancer samples. Am J Pathol. 2000;157(5):1467–72.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ole F. Rasmussen .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Rasmussen, O.F., Schønau, A. (2011). Automated Staining: Dako Perspective. In: Lin, F., Prichard, J. (eds) Handbook of Practical Immunohistochemistry. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-8062-5_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-8062-5_4

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4419-8061-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4419-8062-5

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics