Abstract
Over the past four decades, microprocessors have come to be a vital and inseparable part of the modern world, becoming the digital brain of numerous electronic devices and gadgets that make today’s lifestyle possible. Processors are capable of performing computation at astonishingly high speeds and are extremely integrated, occupying only a few square centimeters of silicon die. However, this computational power comes at a price: the task of verifying a modern microprocessor and guaranteeing the correctness of its operation is increasingly challenging, even for most established processor vendors. To deliver always higher performance to end-users, processor manufacturers are forced to design progressively more complex circuits and employ immense verification teams to eliminate critical design bugs in a timely manner. Unfortunately, too often size doesn’t seem to matter in verification, as schedules continue to slip, and microprocessors find their way to the marketplace with design errors. In this chapter we overview the life-cycle of a microprocessors, discuss the challenges of verifying these devices, and show examples of hardware errors that have escaped into production silicon because of insufficient validation an d their impact.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Bob Bentley. Validating the IntelR PentiumR 4 microprocessor. In DAC, Proceedings of the Design Automation Conference, pages 224–228, June 2001.
Bob Bentley. Validating a modern microprocessor. In CAV, Proceedings of theInternational Conference on Computer Aided Verification, pages 2–4, July 2005.
Kypros Constantinides, OnurMutlu, and Todd Austin. Online design bug detection: RTL analysis, flexible mechanisms, and evaluation. In MICRO, Proceedings of the International Symposium on Microarchitecture, pages 282–293, November 2008.
Intel Corporation. IntelR PentiumR Processor Invalid Instruction Erratum Overview, July 2004. http://www.intel.com/support/processors/pentium/sb/cs-013151.htm .
International Technology Roadmap for Semiconductors executive summary, 2007. http://www.itrs.net/Links/2007ITRS/Home2007.htm.
Kris Kaspersky. Remote code execution through Intel CPU bugs. In HITB, Proceedings of Hack In The Box Conference, October 2008.
John Markoff. Burned once, Intel prepares new chip fortified by constant tests. New York Times, November 2008. http://www.nytimes.com/2008/11/17/technology/companies/17chip.html.
Theo Valich. AMD delays Phenom 2.4 GHz due to TLB errata. The Inquirer, November 2007. http://www.theinquirer.net/inquirer/news/995/1025995/amd-delays-phenom-ghz-due-tlb.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2011 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Wagner, I., Bertacco, V. (2011). Verification of a Modern Processor. In: Post-Silicon and Runtime Verification for Modern Processors. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-8034-2_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-8034-2_1
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-1-4419-8033-5
Online ISBN: 978-1-4419-8034-2
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)