Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The Symbolic Interactionist Perspective and Identity Theory

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Handbook of Identity Theory and Research

Abstract

Symbolic interactionist perspectives or frames underlie most sociological interest in identity. We focus first on the presentation of these perspectives, beginning with the eighteenth-century Scottish moral philosophers and the later work of the philosopher-psychologist George Herbert Mead, tracing their influence on current sociological thinking about social psychology and identity. Two important variants in symbolic interactionist thinking, “traditional symbolic interactionism” and “structural symbolic interactionism,” share fundamentals but exhibit significant variation making for differences in utilities. The essay then focuses on a structural interactionist frame and issues of identity emergent from that frame. The evaluation of a frame rests traditionally on its capacity to serve as supplier of images, assumptions, and concepts used to develop testable theories. That structural symbolic interactionism has this capacity is evidenced in discussions of identity theory, affect control theory, and identity control theory incorporating empirical tests. A second criterion for judging the utility of a frame rests on its capacity to bridge to alternative frames. Discussions of the reciprocal relation of structural symbolic interaction and frames and theories in cognitive social psychology, personality psychology, self-esteem theory, and the social psychology of organizations illustrate that value.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 259.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Adler, P. A., & Adler, P. (1991). Backboards and blackboards: College athletes and role engulfment. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bales, R. F. (1950). Interaction Process Analysis: A method for the study of small groups. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bales, R. F. (1970). Personality and interpersonal behavior. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berger, J., Connor, T. L., & Fisek, M. H. (1974). Expectation states theory: A theoretical research program. Cambridge, MA: Winthrop.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berger, J., Fisek, M. H., Norman, R., & Zelditch, M. (1977). Status characteristics and social interaction. New York: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blumer, H. (1937). Social psychology. In E. P. Schmidt (Ed.), Man and society (pp. 144–198). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blumer, H. (1969). Symbolic interactionism: Perspective and method. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bryson, G. (1945). Man and society: The Scottish inquiry of the eighteenth century. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Burawoy, M. (1979). Manufacturing consent: Changes in the labor process under monopoly capitalism. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burke, P. J. (1980). The self: Measurement requirements from an interactionist perspective. Social Psychology Quarterly, 43, 18–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burke, P. J. (1991). Identity processes and social stress. American Sociological Review, 56, 836–849.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burke, P. J. (2004). Identity and social structure: The 2007 Cooley-Mead award address. Social Psychology Quarterly, 67, 5–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burke, P. J., & Cast, A. D. (1997). Stability and change in the gender identities of newly married couples. Social Psychology Quarterly, 60, 277–290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burke, P. J., & Harrod, M. M. (2005). Too much of a good thing? Social Psychology Quarterly, 68(4), 359–374.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burke, P. J., & Reitzes, D. (1981). The link between identity and role performance. Social Psychology Quarterly, 44, 83–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burke, P. J., & Reitzes, D. (1991). An identity theory approach to commitment. Social Psychology Quarterly, 54, 239–251.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burke, P. J., & Stets, J. E. (2009). Identity theory. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Burke, P. J., & Tully, J. C. (1977). The measurement of role identity. Social Forces, 55, 881–897.

    Google Scholar 

  • Callero, P. L. (1985). Role-identity salience. Social Psychology Quarterly, 48, 203–215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cast, A. D., Stets, J. E., & Burke, P. J. (1999). Does the self conform to the views of others? Social Psychology Quarterly, 62, 68–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cook, K., & Rice, E. (2003). Social exchange theory. In J. DeLamater (Ed.), Handbook of social psychology (pp. 53–76). New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooley, C. H. (1902). Human nature and social order. New York: Scribner.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deaux, K., & Martin, D. (2003). Interpersonal networks and social categories: Specifying levels of context in identity processes. Social Psychology Quarterly, 66, 101–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deaux, K., Reid, A., Mizrahi, K., & Cotting, D. (1999). Connecting the personal to the social: The function of social identification. In T. R. Taylor, R. Kramer, & O. John (Eds.), The psychology of the social self (pp. 91–113). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, J. (1930). Human nature and conduct. New York: Modern Library.

    Google Scholar 

  • DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1991). Introduction. In W. W. Powell & P. J. DiMaggio (Eds.), The new institutionalism in organizational analysis (pp. 1–38). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ervin, L. H., & Stryker, S. (2006). Theorizing the relationship between self-esteem and identity. In T. J. Owens, S. Stryker, & N. Goodman (Eds.), Extending self-esteem theory and research: Sociological and psychological currents (pp. 29–55). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Francis, L. E. (1997). Ideology and interpersonal emotion management: Redefining identity in two support groups. Social Psychology Quarterly, 60, 153–171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Chicago: Aldine.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goffman, E. (1959). The presentation of self in everyday life. New York: Doubleday.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goffman, E. (1974). Frame analysis: An essay on the organization of experience. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gouldner, A. W. (1970). The coming crisis in western sociology. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, S. R. (2001). What can interactionsism contribute to the study of inequality? The case of marriage and beyond. Symbolic Interaction, 24, 455–480.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heise, D. R. (1979). Understanding events: Affect and the construction of social action. New York: Cambridge Univ. Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heise, D. R. (1986). Modeling symbolic interaction. In J. S. Coleman, S. Lindenberg, & S. Nowak (Eds.), Approaches to social theory (pp. 291–309). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heise, D. R. (2007). Expressive order: Confirming sentiments in social actions. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heise., D. R., & Calhan, C. (1995). Emotion norms in interpersonal events. Social Psychology Quarterly, 58, 223–240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Higgins, E. T. (1987). Self-discrepancy: A theory relating self and affect. Psychological Review, 94, 319–340.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hogg, M. A., Terry, D. J., & White, K. M. (1995). A tale of two theories: A critical comparison of identity theory with social identity theory. Social Psychology Quarterly, 58, 255–269.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huber, J. (1973). Symbolic Interaction as a pragmatic perspective: The bias of emergent theory. American Sociological Review, 38, 274–284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • James, W. (1890). Principles of psychology. New York: Holt.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • King., A. B. (2001). Affective dimensions of Internet culture. Social Science Computer Review, 19(4), 414–430.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kornhauser, W. (1962). Scientist in industry: Conflict and accommodation. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kraatz, M. S., & Block, E. S. (2008). Organizational implications of institutional pluralism. In R. Greenwood, C. Oliver, R. Suddaby, & K. Sahlin-Andersson (Eds.), The handbook of organizational institutionalism (pp. 243–275). London: Sage.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Kroska, A. (1997). The division of labor in the home: A review and reconceptualization. Social Psychology Quarterly, 60, 304–322.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kroska, A. (2001). Do we have consensus? Examining the relationship between gender ideology and role meanings. Social Psychology Quarterly, 64, 18–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kroska, A. (2008). Examining husband-wife differences in the meaning of family financial support. Sociological Perspectives, 51(1), 63–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, M. H. (1964). Major trends in symbolic interaction theory in the past twenty-five years. Sociological Quarterly, V, 61–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, M. H., & McPartland, T. S. (1954). An empirical investigation of self-attitudes. American Sociological Review, 19, 16–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lawler, E. J. (2001). An affect theory of social exchange. American Journal of Sociology, 107, 321–352.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lawler, E. J. (2003). Interaction, emotion, and collective identity. In P. J. Burke, T. J. Owens, R. T. Serpe, & P. A. Thoits (Eds), Advances in identity theory and research (pp. 135–150). New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Lawler, E. J., Thye, S. R., & Yoon, J. (2000). Emotions and group cohesion in productive exchange. American Journal of Sociology, 106, 616–657.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, J. D. (1998). Which kids can “become” scientists? Effects of gender, self-concepts, and perceptions of scientists. Social Psychology Quarterly, 61, 199–219.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, J. D. (2002). More than ability: Gender and personal relationships influence science and technology involvement. Sociology of Education, 75, 349–373.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, J. D. (2005). Do girls change more than boys? Gender differences and similarities in the impact of new relationships on identities and behavior. Self and Identity, 4, 131–147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lucas, J. W. (2003). Status processes and the institutionalization of women as leaders. American Sociological Review, 68, 464–480.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacKinnon, N. J., & Keating, L. J. (1989). The structure of emotion: A review of the problem and a cross-cultural analysis. Social Psychology Quarterly, 52, 70–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacKinnon, N. J., & Langford, T. (1994). The meaning of occupational prestige scores: A social psychological analysis and interpretation. Sociological Quarterly, 35(2), 215–245.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • March, J. G. (1994). A primer on decision-making. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • March, J. G. (1999). The pursuit of organizational intelligence. Malden, MA: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Markus, H. R. (1977). Self-schemata and processing information about self. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35, 63–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCall, G. J., & Simmons, J. L. (1978). Identities and Interactions: An examination of human associations in everyday life. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mead, G. H. (1934). Mind, self and society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merolla, D., Serpe, R. T., Stryker, S., & Schultz, P. W. (2010). Identity processes and intentions for behavior: The impact of proximate social structures. Unpublished manuscript.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merton, R. K. (1957). Social theory and social structure. New York: Free Press of Glencoe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merton, R. K., & Kitt, A. S. (1950). Contribution to theory of reference group behavior. In R. K. Merton & P. F. Lazarsfeld (Eds.), Continuities in social research: Studies in the scope and method of the American Soldier (pp. X–XX). Glencoe, IL: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, J. W., & Rowan, B. (1977). Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 83, 340–363.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mutran, E., & Burke, P. J. (1979). Personalism as a component of old age identity. Research on Aging, 1(1), 37–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nuttbrock, L., & Freudiger, P. (1991). Identity salience and motherhood: A test of Stryker’s theory. Social Psychology Quarterly, 54, 146–157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Osgood, C. E., Suci, G. J., & Tannenbaum, P. H. (1957). The measurement of meaning. Chicago: University of Illinois Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Owens, T. J., & Serpe, R. T. (2003). The role of self-esteem in family identity salience and commitment among Blacks, Latinos, and Whites. In P. J. Burke, T. J. Owens, R. T. Serpe, & P. A. Thoits (Eds), Advances in identity theory and research (pp. 85–104). New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Park, R. E. (1955). Society: Collective behavior, news and opinion, sociology, and modern society. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Powers, W. T. (1973). Behavior: The control of perception. Chicago: Aldine.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pratt, M. G., & Foreman, P. O. (2000). Classifying management responses to multiple organizational identities. Academy of Management Review, 25, 18–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prentice, D. A., Miller, D. T., & Lightdale, J. R. (1994). Asymmetries in attachments to groups and to their members: Distinguishing between common-identity and common-bond groups. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 20, 484–493.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pugh, M. D., & Wahrman, R. W. (1983). Neutralizing sexism in mixed sex groups: Do women have to be better than men? American Journal of Sociology, 88, 746–762.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rao, H., Monin, P., & Durand, R. (2003). Institutional change in Toque Ville: Nouvelle cuisine as an identity movement in French cuisine. American Journal of Sociology, 108, 795–843.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reid, A., & Deaux, K. (1996). Relationship between social and personal identities: Segregation or integration. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 1084–1091.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reitzes, D., & Burke, P. J. (1980). College student identity: Measurement and implications. The Pacific Sociological Review, 23(1), 45–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ridgeway, C. (2006). Status construction theory. In P. J. Burke (Ed.), Contemporary social psychological theories (pp. 301–323). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, B. W., & Donahue, E. M. (1994). One personality, multiple selves: Integrating personality and social roles. Journal of Personality, 62, 199–210.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, D. T., & Smith-Lovin, L. (2006). Affect control theory. In P. J. Burke (Ed), Contemporary social psychological theories (pp. 137–164). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, A. (1999). The violent character of sexual-eroticism in cross-cultural comparison. International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, 19(12), 81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Selznick, P. (1949). TVA and the grass roots. Berkeley, CA: Univiversity of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Serpe, R. T. (1987). Stability and change in self: A symbolic interactionist explanation. Social Psychology Quarterly, 50, 44–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Serpe, R. T. (1991). The cerebral self: Thinking and planning about identity-relevant activity. In J. A. Howard & P. L. Callero (Eds.), The self-society dynamic: Cognition, emotion and action (pp. 55–73). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Serpe, R. T., & Stryker, S. (1987). The construction of self and the reconstruction of social relationships. In E. J. Lawler & B. Markovsky (Eds.), Advances in group processes: Theory and research (Vol. 4, pp. 41–82). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Serpe, R. T., & Stryker, S. (1993). Prior social ties and movement into new social relationships. In E. J. Lawler, B. Markovsky, K. Heimer, & J. O’Brien (Eds.), Advances in group processes (Vol. 10, pp. 283–304). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snyder, M., & Swann, W. (1976). When actions reflect attitudes: The politics of impression management. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 34, 1034–1042.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Snyder, M., & Swann, W. (1978). Hypothesis-testing processes in social interaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36, 1202–1212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stets, J. E., & Burke, P. J. (1996). Gender, control, and interaction. Social Psychology Quarterly, 59, 193–220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stets, J. E., & Carter, M. J. (2006). The moral identity: A principle level identity. In K. McClelland & T. J. Fararo (Eds.), Purpose, meaning, and action: Control systems theories in sociology (pp. 203–223). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stets, J. E., & Harrod, M. M. (2004). Verification across multiple identities: The role of status. Social Psychology Quarterly, 67, 155–171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strauss, A. L. (1978). Negotiations: Varieties, contexts, processes and social order. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stryker, R. (1989). Limits on technocratization of law: The elimination of the National Labor Relations Board’s Division of Economic Research. American Sociological Review, 54, 341–358.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stryker, R. (1994). Rules, resources and legitimacy processes: Some implications for social conflict, order, and change. American Journal of Sociology, 99, 847–910.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stryker, R. (2000). Legitimacy processes as institutional politics: Implications for theory and research in the sociology of organizations. Research in the Sociology of Organizations, 17, 179–223.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stryker, S. (1968). Identity salience and role performance: The relevance of symbolic interaction theory for family research. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 30, 558–564.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stryker, S. (1977). Developments in two social psychologies: Toward an appreciation of mutual relevance. Sociometry, 40, 145–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stryker, S. (1980/2000). Symbolic interactionism: A social structural version. Menlo Park, CA: Benjamin-Cummings/Blackburn.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stryker, S. (1994). Freedom and constraint in social and personal life: Toward resolving the paradox of self. In G. Platt & C. Gordon (Eds), Self, collective behavior, and society: Essays honoring the contributions of Ralph H. Turner (pp. 119–138). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stryker, S. (1997). In the beginning there is society: Lessons from a sociological social psychology. In C. McGarty, & S. A. Haslam (Eds.), The message of social psychology: Perspectives on mind in society (pp. 315–327). Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stryker, S. (2000). Identity competition: Key to differential social movement involvement? In S. Stryker, T. J. Owens, & R. W. White (Eds.), Self, identity, and social movements (pp. 21–40). Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stryker, S. (2002). Identity competition: Key to differential social movement participation? In S. Stryker, T. J. Owens, & R. W. White (Eds.), Self, identity, and social movements (pp. 21–40). Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stryker, S. (2004). Integrating emotion into identity theory. In J. H. Turner (Ed.), Theory and research on human emotions (pp. 1–24). New York: Elsevier.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Stryker, S. (2008). From Mead to a structural symbolic interactionism and beyond. Annual Review of Sociology, 34, 15–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stryker, S., & Burke, J. (2000). The past, present, and future of an identity theory. Social Psychology Quarterly, 63, 284–297.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stryker, S., & Serpe, R. T. (1982). Commitment, identity salience, and role behavior. In W. Ickes & E. S. Knowles (Eds.), Personality, roles, and social behavior (pp. 199–218). New York: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Stryker, S., & Serpe, R. T. (1983). Toward a theory of family influence in the socialization of children. In A. C. Kerchoff (Ed.), Research in sociology of education and socialization: Personal change over the life course (Vol. 4, pp. 47–74). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stryker, S., & Serpe, R. T. (1994). Identity salience and psychological centrality: Equivalent, overlapping, or complementary concepts? Social Psychology Quarterly, 57, 16–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stryker, S., Serpe, R. T., & Hunt, M. O. (2005). Making good on a promise: The impact of larger social structures on commitments. In S. I. Thye & E. J. Lawler (Eds.), Advances in group process: Social identification in groups (Vol. 22, pp. 93–124). Oxford, UK: Elsevier.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Stryker, S., & Vryan, K. D. (2003). The symbolic interactionist frame. In J. Delamater (Ed.), Handbook of social psychology (pp. 3–28). New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stryker, S., & Wells, L. E. (1988). Stability and change in self over the life course. In P. B. Baltes, D. L. Featherman, & R. M. Lerner (Eds.), Life span development and behavior (pp. 191–229). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swann, W. B., Jr. (1981). Self-verification processes: How we sustain our self-conceptions. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 17, 351–372.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swann, W. B., Jr. (1983). Self-verification: Bringing social reality into harmony with the self. In J. Suls & A. G. Greenwald (Eds.), Social psychological perspectives on the self (Vol. 2, pp. 33–66). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tajfel, H. (1981). Human groups and social categories. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tajfel, H. (1982). Social identity and intergroup relations. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1979). An integrative theory of inter-group conflict. In W. G. Austin & S. Worchel (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 33–47). Monterey, CA: Brooks-Cole.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thoits, P. A., & Virshup, L. K. (1997). Me’s and we’s: Forms and functions of social identities. In R. Ashmore & L. Jussim (Eds.), Self and identity: Fundamental issues (pp. 106–133). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, W. I., & Thomas, D. S. (1928). The child in America: Behavior problems and programs. New York: Knopf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsoudis, O. (2000). Relation of affect control theory to the sentencing of criminals. Journal of Social Psychology, 140, 473–485.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tsoudis, O., & Smith-Lovin, L. (1998). How bad was it? The effects of victim and perpetrator emotion on responses to criminal court vignettes. Social Forces, 77, 695–722.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsoudis, O., & Smith-Lovin, L. (2001). Criminal identity: The key to situational construals in mock criminal court cases. Sociological Spectrum, 21(1), 3–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weinstein, E. A., & Deutschberger, P. (1963). Some dimensions of altercasting. Sociometry, 26, 454–466.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weinstein, E. A., & Deutschberger, P. (1964). Tasks, bargains, and identities in social interaction. Social Forces, 42, 451–456.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wiggins, B., & Heise, D. R. (1987). Expectations, intentions, and behavior: Some tests of affect control theory. Journal of Mathematical Sociology, 13, 153–169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zald, M. (Ed.). (1970). Power in organizations. Nashville, TN: Vanderbilt University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Sociology, Kent State University, Kent, OH, USA

    Richard T. Serpe

  2. Department of Sociology, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN, USA

    Sheldon Stryker

Authors
  1. Richard T. Serpe
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Sheldon Stryker
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Richard T. Serpe .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Leonard M. Miller School of Medicine, Department of Epidemiology and Public He, University of Miami, N.W. 10th Avenue, Suite 321 1425, Miami, 33136, Florida, USA

    Seth J. Schwartz

  2. , Department of Psychology, Catholic University of Leuven, Tiensestraat 102, Leuven, 3000, Belgium

    Koen Luyckx

  3. School of Psychology, University of Sussex, Brighton, BN1 9QH, United Kingdom

    Vivian L. Vignoles

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Serpe, R.T., Stryker, S. (2011). The Symbolic Interactionist Perspective and Identity Theory. In: Schwartz, S., Luyckx, K., Vignoles, V. (eds) Handbook of Identity Theory and Research. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-7988-9_10

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation