Advertisement

A Framework for the Design of Service Systems

  • Yao-Hua Tan
  • Wout Hofman
  • Jaap Gordijn
  • Joris Hulstijn
Chapter
Part of the Service Science: Research and Innovations in the Service Economy book series (SSRI)

Abstract

We propose a framework for the design and implementation of service systems, especially to design controls for long-term sustainable value co-creation. The framework is based on the software support tool e3-control. To illustrate the framework we use a large-scale case study, the Beer Living Lab, for simplification of customs procedures in international trade. The BeerLL shows how value co-creation can be achieved by reduction of administrative burden in international beer export due to electronic customs. Participants in the BeerLL are Heineken, IBM and Dutch Tax & Customs.

Keywords

Service science service systems value co-creation service innovation lifecycle e3-control e3-value 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This research was partially supported by the integrated project ITAIDE (Nr.027829), which is funded by the 6th Framework IST Programme of the European Commission (see www.itaide.org).

References

  1. Anderson, J.C., Narus, J., Narus, A., and van Rossum, W. (2006). Customer value propositions in business markets. Harvard Business Review, 84(3), pp. 90–99.Google Scholar
  2. Arens, A. and Loebbecke, J. (1999). Auditing, an Integrated Approach, 8th edition, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs.Google Scholar
  3. Baida, Z. (2006). Software-aided Service Bundling – Intelligent Methods and Tools for Graphical Service Modeling, Ph.D. thesis, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
  4. Baida, Z., Rukanova, B.D., Wigand, R.T., and Tan, Y.H. (2007). Partnership: The story of how Heineken’s supply chain benefits from tight collaboration with government. Supply Chain Management Review, 11(7), pp. 11–12.Google Scholar
  5. Baida, Z., Rukanova, B., Liu, J., and Tan, Y.H. (2008). Preserving control in trade procedure redesign – The Beer living lab, electronic markets. The International Journal, 18(1), 53–64.Google Scholar
  6. Beer Living Lab (2007). Beer Living Lab, Final Report, D5.1:5, ITAIDE.Google Scholar
  7. Bons, R.W.H., Lee, R.M., and Wagenaar, R.W. (1999). Computer-aided auditing and interorganizational trade procedures. International Journal of Intelligent Systems in Accounting, Finance and Management, 8(1), pp. 25–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Buhr, R.J.A. (1998). Use case maps as architectural entities for complex systems. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 24(12), pp. 1131–1155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Chen, K.-T. and Lee, R. M. (1992). Schematic evaluation of internal accounting control systems EURIDIS Research Monograph, Erasmus University Rotterdam.Google Scholar
  10. COSO (1992). Internal Control-Integrated Framework. The Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission, New York.Google Scholar
  11. Curtis, K. and Henderson, A. (2006). Hiding in plain sight: service innovation – a new priority for chief executives. IBM Institute for business value. Somers, New York.Google Scholar
  12. Derzsi, Z. and Gordijn, J. (2006). A framework for business/it alignment in networked value ­constellations. In T. Latour and M. Petit, editors, Proceedings of the Workshops of the 18th International Conference on Advanced Information Systems Engineering (CAiSE 2006) Namur University Press, Namur, B, pp. 219–226.Google Scholar
  13. Dietz, J.L.G. (2006). Enterprise Ontology – Theory and Methodology, Springer, Berlin.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Edvardsson, B. and Olsson, J. (1996). Key concepts for new service development. The Service Industries Journal, 16(2), pp. 140–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Fensel, D., Kerrigan, M., and Zaremba, M. (eds.) (2008). Implementing Semantic Web Services – The SESA framework, Springer, Heidelberg.Google Scholar
  16. Franken, H. and Janssen, W. (1998). Get a grip on changing business processes: Results from the Testbed project. Knowledge and Process Management, 5(4), pp. 208–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Geerts, G. and McCarthy, W.E. (1999). An Accounting Object Infrastructure for Knowledge-Based Enterprise Models. IEEE Intelligent Systems and Their Applications, 14(4), pp. 89–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Gordijn, J. and Akkermans, H. (2003). Value based requirements engineering: Exploring innovative e-commerce idea. Requirements Engineering Journal, 8(2), pp. 114–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Heineke, J. and Davis, M. (2007). The emergence of service operations management as an academic discipline. Journal of Operations Management, 25, pp. 364–374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hofman, W.J. (1994). A conceptual model of a Business Transaction Management System, Ph.D. thesis, Uitgeverij Tutein Nolthenius, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
  21. Janssen, M., Gortmaker, J., and Wagenaar, R.W. (2006). Web service orchestration in public administration: Challenges, roles and growth stages. Information Systems Management, 23(2), pp. 44–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kartseva, V., Gordijn, J., and Tan, Y.-H. (2004). Value-based business modelling for network organizations: Lessons learned from the electricity sector. Proceedings of the 12th European Conference on Information Systems (ECIS’04), Turku.Google Scholar
  23. Kartseva, V., Gordijn, J., and Tan, Y.-H. (2005). Towards a modelling tool for designing control mechanisms for network organisations. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 10(2), pp. 57–84.Google Scholar
  24. Kartseva, V., Gordijn, J., and Tan, Y.-H. (2006). Inter-organisational controls as value objects in network organisations. Proceedings of the 18th Conference of Advanced Information Systems Engineering (CAiSE06), Springer Verlag, Berlin pp. 336–350.Google Scholar
  25. Kartseva, V., Hulstijn, J., Gordijn, J., and Tan, Y.-H. (2010). Control patterns in a healthcare network. European Journal of Information Systems, 19, 320–343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Lankhorst, M. (2005). Enterprise Architecture at work, Springer, Heidelberg.Google Scholar
  27. Liu, J., Baida, Z., Tan, Y.-H., and Rukanova, B. (2006). Designing controls for e-government in network organizations. Proceedings of the 13th Research Symposium on Emerging Electronic Markets, September 23–25, Stuttgart, Germany, pp. 22–36.Google Scholar
  28. Liu, J., Baida, Z., and Tan, Y.-H. (2007). e-Customs Control Procedures Redesign Methodology: Model-Based Application. Proceedings of the 15th European Conference of Information Systems (ECIS 2007), St. Gallen, Switzerland.Google Scholar
  29. Liu, J., Higgins, A., and Tan, Y.-H. (2010). IT enabled redesign of export procedure for high value pharmaceutical product under temperature control: the case of drug living lab. Proceedings of the 11th Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research (DG.O 2010), ACM International Conference Proceeding Series.Google Scholar
  30. McGovern, J., Sims, O., Jain, A., and Little, M. (2006). Enterprise Service Oriented Architectures – Concepts, Challenges, Recommendations, Springer, Dordrecht.Google Scholar
  31. Nuseibeh, B., Kramer, J., and Finkelstein, A. (1994). A framework for expressing relationships between multiple views in requirements specification. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 20(10), pp. 760–773.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Pateli, A.G. and Giaglis, G.M. (2004). A research framework for analysing business models. European Journal of Information Systems, 13(4), pp. 302–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Petzinger, T. Jr. (1995). Hard Landing: The Epic Contest for Power and Profits That Plunged the Airlines into Chaos, Times Books, New York.Google Scholar
  34. Porter, M.E. (1980). Competitive Advantage. Creating and Sustaining Superior Performance, The Free Press, New York.Google Scholar
  35. Quartel, D.A.C., Steen, M.W.A., Pokraev S., and Sinderen M.J. van (2007). COSMO: A conceptual framework for service modelling and refinement. Information Systems Frontiers, 9(2–3), pp. 225–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Romney, M.B. and Steinbart, P.J. (2003). Accounting Information Systems, 9th edition, Prentice Hall, New Jersey.Google Scholar
  37. Spohrer, J. and Kwam, S.K. (2009). Service Science, Management, Engineering and Design (SSMED) – An emerging discipline – Outline and references. International Journal on Information Systems in the Service Sector, 1(3).Google Scholar
  38. Starreveld, R.W., de Mare, B., and Joels, E. (1994). Bestuurlijke Informatieverzorging, Deel 1, 4th edition, Samsom, Alphen aan den Rijn (in Dutch).Google Scholar
  39. Tan, Y.H. and Gordijn, J. (2005). A design methodology for modeling trustworthy value webs. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 9(3), pp. 31–48.Google Scholar
  40. Tapscott, D., Ticoll, D., and Lowy, A. (2000). Digital Capital – Harnessing the Power of Business Webs, Nicholas Brealy Publishing, London.Google Scholar
  41. Uschold, M., King, M., Moralee, S., and Zorgios, Y. (1998). The enterprise ontology. The Knowledge Engineering Review, 13(1), pp. 31–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. van der Aalst, W.M.P., Reijers, H.A., Weijters, A.J.M.M., van Dongen, B.F., Alves de Medeiros, A.K., Song, M., and Verbeek, H.M.W. (2007). Business process mining: An industrial application. Information Systems, 32(5), pp. 713–732.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Weigand, H. and De Moor, A. (2003). Workflow analysis with communication norms. Data & Knowledge Engineering, 47, pp. 349–369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Wieringa, R.J. (2003). Design Methods for Reactive Systems, Morgan Kaufman, San Fransisco.Google Scholar
  45. Yu, E. (1995). Models for supporting the redesign of organizational work. In COCS ’95: Proceedings of Conference on Organizational Computing Systems, ACM Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer US 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Yao-Hua Tan
    • 1
  • Wout Hofman
    • 2
  • Jaap Gordijn
    • 3
  • Joris Hulstijn
    • 4
  1. 1.Department of Technology, Policy and ManagementDelft University of TechnologyDelftThe Netherlands
  2. 2.TNO Information and Communication TechnologyDelftThe Netherlands
  3. 3.Department of Computer SciencesVrije University AmsterdamAmsterdamThe Netherlands
  4. 4.Thaurus and Delft University of TechnologyThe Hague and DelftThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations