Abstract
Given the “struggle for existence” an organism might hope to outshine its competitors by virtue of the excellence of its positive characters (e.g. greater speed, longer neck). But an organism that could also (i) identify, defend against, and attack its foes, and (ii) identify and support its friends, would seem to have an even greater advantage. To identify is to allow discrimination – friend or foe? – the former classification being non–dangerous (potentially unharmful), the latter classification being dangerous (potentially harmful). For this, friend and foe must have distinguishable characters and the organism must both detect these characters, and know which characters are likely to associate with non-danger (friend) and which characters are likely to associate with danger (foe). After this discrimination, there must then be a response (either non–alarm, or alarm) that, in turn, would lead to a variety of other responses of an adaptive nature (e.g. escape from, or destroy, the foe).
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2011 Springer New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Forsdyke, D.R. (2011). Self/Not-Self?. In: Evolutionary Bioinformatics. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-7771-7_15
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-7771-7_15
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4419-7770-0
Online ISBN: 978-1-4419-7771-7
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)