The Potential of Social Media for Students with Disabilities

Chapter

Abstract

Social media tools are vital to the lives of teenagers today. According to the 2010 study by Kaiser Family Foundation, American teenagers, aged 8–18, spend an average of 7.5 hours a day, 7 days a week using these tools (Rideout, Foehr, & Roberts, 2010). It is against this backdrop of our teenagers’ avid media fascination that parents, educators, and the general public have been trying to understand and determine the best way to utilize these tools to engage students in education.

Keywords

Depression Schizophrenia Nash Hone Cute 

References

  1. Afterschool Alliance. (2009). America after 3 PM. Retrieved from http://www.afterschoolalliance.org/AA3_Full_Report.pdf.
  2. Ambrogi, S. (2009). “Sexting” craze on the rise among British children. Reuters. Retrieved from http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSTRE5733SG20090804.
  3. Bertsos, C. (2009, September 2). Local man uses music to combat disease. The State News.Google Scholar
  4. Bessière, K., Pressman, S., Kiesler, S., & Kraut, R. (2010). Effects of Internet use on health and depression: A longitudinal study. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 12(1), e6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Boyd, D. (2007). Why youth (heart) social network sites: The role of networked publics in teenage social life. In D. Buckingham (Ed.), MacArthur Foundation series on digital learning – Youth, identity, and digital media (pp. 119–142). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  6. Brodin, J., & Lindstrand, P. (2004). Are computers the solution to support development in children in need of special support? Technology and Disabilities, 16(3), 137–145.Google Scholar
  7. Business Week. (2005, September 26). E-Society: My world is cyworld. Business Week.Google Scholar
  8. Cabiria, J. (2008). Virtual world and real world permeability: Transference of positive benefits for marginalized gay and lesbian populations. Journal of Virtual Worlds Research, 1(1), 1–13.Google Scholar
  9. Cavazza, F. (2009). Social media landscape redux. Retrieved from http://www.fredcavazza.net/2009/04/10/social-media-landscape-redux/.
  10. Chen, P. (2009, November 5). Texting as a health tool for teenagers. New York Times.Google Scholar
  11. Cheng, Y., & Ye, J. (2009). Exploring the social competence of students with autism spectrum conditions in a collaborative virtual learning environment – The pilot study. Computers & Education, 54(4), 1068–1077.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Childress, H. (2004). Teenagers, territory and the appropriation of space. Childhood, 11(2), 195–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. CNNIC. (2009). 2009 Chinese online game market research report. Retrieved from http://www.cnnic.net.cn/uploadfiles/pdf/2009/11/24/110832.pdf.
  14. Cosenza, V. (2009). World map of social networks. Retrieved from http://www.vincos.it/world-map-of-social-networks/.
  15. Dreifus, C. (2009, October 12). A conversation with Carol W. Greider on winning a Nobel Prize in science. New York Times.Google Scholar
  16. Ellison, N. B., Steinfield, C., & Lampe, C. (2007). The benefits of Facebook “friends”: Social capital and college students’ use of online social network sites. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 12(4). Retrieved from http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol12/issue14/ellison.html.
  17. Entner, R. (2010). Under-aged texting: Usage and actual cost. Retrieved from http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/under-aged-texting-usage-and-actual-cost/.
  18. Gal, E., Bauminger, N., Goren-Bar, D., Pianesi, F., Stock, O., Zancanaro, M., et al. (2009). Enhancing social communication of children with high-functioning autism through a co-located interface. AI & Society, 24(1), 75–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Gardner, H. (1999). The disciplined mind: Beyond facts and standardized tests, The K-12 education that every child deserves. New York: Simon and Schuster (and New York: Penguin Putnam).Google Scholar
  20. Gardner, H., & Hatch, T. (1989). Multiple intelligences go to school: Educational implications of the theory of multiple intelligences. Educational Researcher, 18(8), 4–9.Google Scholar
  21. Gaster, S. (1991). Urban children’s access to their neighborhood: Changes over three generations. Environment and Behavior, 23(1), 70–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Gee, J. P. (2007). What video games have to teach us about learning and literacy. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  23. GSMA & NTT Docomo. (2009). Children’s use of mobile phones: An international comparison. Retrieved from http://www.gsmworld.com/documents/Final_report.pdf.
  24. Happé, F., & Frith, U. (2009). The beautiful otherness of the autistic mind. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 364, 1345–1350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Heim, J., Brandtzæg, P. B., Kaare, B. H., Endestad, T., & Torgersen, L. (2007). Children’s usage of media technologies and psychosocial factors. New Media Society, 9(3), 425–454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hundley, H. L., & Shyles, L. (2010). U.S. teenagers’ perceptions and awareness of digital technology: A focus group approach. New Media Society, doi: 10.1177/1461444809342558.
  27. Hwang, J. M., Cheong, P. H., & Feeley, T. H. (2009). Being young and feeling blue in Taiwan: Examining adolescent depressive mood and online and offline activities. New Media Society, 11(7), 1101–1121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. iResearch. (2009). 2009 iResearch report on Chinese teenagers’ behavior on the Internet. Retrieved from http://report.iresearch.cn/1270.html.
  29. Kaplan, A., & Haenlein, M. (2010). Users of the world, unite! The challenges and opportunities of social media. Business Horizons, 53(1), 59–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Kohler, C. (2009). Top 10 iPhone games, as voted by Wired.com readers. Wired.Google Scholar
  31. Lenhart, A. (2009). Teens and sexting: How and why minor teens are sending sexually suggestive nude or nearly nude images via text messaging. Washington, DC: Pew Internet & American Life Project.Google Scholar
  32. Lenhart, A., Kahne, J., Middaugh, E., Macgill, A., Evans, C., & Vitak, J. (2008). Teens, video games and civics. Washington, DC: Pew Internet & American Life Project.Google Scholar
  33. Lenhart, A., Madden, M., Macgill, A., & Smith, A. (2007). Teens and social media. Washington, DC: Pew Internet & American Life Project.Google Scholar
  34. Leung, L. (2003). Impacts of Net-generation attributes, seductive properties of the Internet, and gratifications-obtained on Internet use. Telematics and Informatics, 20(2), 107–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Lindstrand, P., & Brodin, J. (2004). Parents and children view ICT. Technology and Disabilities, 16(3), 179–183.Google Scholar
  36. Lukoff, K. (2009). Top 10 social games in China. The Next Web.com. Retrieved from http://thenextweb.com/asia/2009/12/15/top-10-social-games-china/.
  37. Lyman, P., Billings, A., Ellinger, S., Finn, M., & Perkel, D. (2005). Literature review: Kids’ informal learning and digital-mediated experiences. White paper for MacArthur Foundation.Google Scholar
  38. Market Research Report. (2007). Mixi: A case study of Japan’s most successful social networking service. Infinita.Google Scholar
  39. Mayfield, A. (2008). What is social media? (V.1.4). Retrieved from http://www.icrossing.co.uk/.../What_is_Social_Media_iCrossing_ebook.pdf.
  40. McLuhan, M., & Fiore, Q. (1967). The medium is the message. Corte Madiera, CA: Ginko Press.Google Scholar
  41. McLuhan, M., & Gordon, W. T. (2003). Understanding media: the extensions of man. Corte Madera, CA: Gingko Press.Google Scholar
  42. MDA. (2010). UK sends 11 million text messages an hour. Retrieved from http://www.themda.org/mda-press-releases/the-q4-2009-uk-mobile-trends-report.php.
  43. Ministry of Industry and Information Technology. (2006). About the charge of telephone in Beijing. Retrieved April 16, 2010, from http://www.miit.gov.cn/n11293472/n11293832/n11294327/n11303938/11641157.html.
  44. Minkove, J. F. (2009). Prized curiosity. Dome: A publication for the Johns Hopkins Medicine Family. Retrieved from http://www.hopkinsmedicine.org/dome/1109/headliners1.cfm.
  45. Morrison, C. (2010). Zynga takes the top three on this week’s list of top Facebook gainers by DAU. Retrieved from http://www.insidesocialgames.com/2010/03/31/zynga-takes-the-top-three-on-this-weeks-list-of-top-facebook-gainers-by-dau/.
  46. Mundy, L. (2010, March 28). In Japan, teenage cellphone culture makes real connections. The Washington Post.Google Scholar
  47. Naish, J. (2009). Mobile phones for children: A boon or a peril? Timesonline. Retrieved from http://women.timesonline.co.uk/tol/life_and_style/women/families/article6556283.ece.
  48. O’Neill, N. (2008). What exactly are social games? Social Times. Retrieved from http://www.socialtimes.com/2008/07/social-games/.
  49. Oldenburg, R. (1999). The great good place. New York: Marlowe & Company.Google Scholar
  50. Orkut. (2010). Orkut demographics. Retrieved from http://www.orkut.co.in/MembersAll.aspx.
  51. Parker-Pope, T. (2009). When Dad banned text messaging. Retrieved from http://well.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/03/30/when-dad-banned-text-messaging/.
  52. Repman, J. (1993). Collaborative, computer-based learning: cognitive and avective outcomes. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 9, 149–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Rideout, C. J., Foehr, U. G., & Roberts, D. F. (2010). Generation M 2 : Media in the lives of 8- to 18-year-olds (A Kaiser Family Foundation study). Menlo Park, CA: Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation.Google Scholar
  54. Sailers, E. (2009). iPhone and iPod touch apps for (special) education. Retrieved from http://www.mpf.org/iPhone%20and%20iPod%20apps%20for%20sp.pdf.
  55. Soukup, C. (2006). Computer-mediated communication as a virtual third place: Building Oldenburg’s great good places on the world wide web. New Media Society, 8(3), 421–440.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Squire, K. D. (2002). Rethinking the role of games in education. Game Studies, 2(1). Retrieved Feburary 07, 2011, from http://www.gamestudies.org/0102/squire/
  57. Steinkuehler, C. (2008). Cognition and literacy in massively multiplayer online games. In J. Coiro, M. Knobel, C. Lankshear, & D. Leu (Eds.), Handbook of research on new literacies (pp. 611–634). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  58. Steinkuehler, C., & Duncan, S. C. (2008, August). Informal scientific reasoning in online game forums. Presented at the annual meeting of the American Psychological Association, Boston, MA.Google Scholar
  59. Steinkuehler, C., & Williams, D. (2006). Where everybody knows your (screen) name: Online games as “third places”. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 11(4), 885–909.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Tan, T. S., & Cheung, W. S. (2006). Effects of computer collaborative group work on peer acceptance of a junior pupil with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). Computers & Education, 50(3), 725–741.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Thurlow, C., & Brown, A. (2002). Generation txt? The sociolinguistics of young people’s text-messaging. Discourse Analysis Online, 1(1). Retrieved Feburary 07, 2011, from http://faculty.washington.edu/thurlow/papers/Thurlow(2003)-DAOL.pdf
  62. Turkle, S. (1995). Life on the screen. New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
  63. Turkle, S. (2007). Evocative objects. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  64. Zhao, Y. (2009). Catching up or keeping the lead: American education in the age of globalization. Alexandria, VA: ASCD.Google Scholar
  65. Zhao, Y., & Lai, C. (2008). Massively multi-player online role playing games (MMORPGS) and foreign language education. In R. Ferdig (Ed.), Handbook of research on effective electronic gaming in education. New York: IDEA Group.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of OregonPortlandUSA

Personalised recommendations