Advertisement

Dynamics of Peripheral Regulatory and Effector T Cells Competing for Antigen Presenting Cells

Chapter

Abstract

A healthy immune system requires a balance between effector T (T E ) cells that mount immune responses, and regulatory T (T R ) cells that prevent them. Understanding this balance requires knowing how the repertoires of T E and T R cells in the periphery are patterned and related to each other. The present work addresses this issue in the framework of the Crossregulation model, which was formulated to contemplate the dynamics of a large number of T cell clones recognizing a non-exclusive set of antigen-presenting cells (APCs). Assuming a continuous thymic export, three distinct patterns for the peripheral repertoire emerge from the simulations. These patterns are distinguished by the composition of the resident population, i.e., the subset of clones that can persist in the periphery. On one extreme, there is a repertoire pattern characterised by a predominance of T E cell clones and a too small T R -cell pool only maintained in the periphery by the continuous thymus export. Thus, this repertoire pattern cannot be the basis of a healthy immune system, because peripheral tolerance to self antigens is not ensured. On the other extreme, there is a repertoire pattern showing a predominance of T R cells maintained by their T E counterparts coming from the thymus. In spite of ensuring peripheral tolerance, this repertoire pattern does not appear efficient to fight infections occurring throughout life. In the middle of these two extremes lies a third repertoire pattern exhibiting a partition of the peripheral compartment similar to the one suggested in a previous work. In this repertoire structure, a small subset of highly crossreactive T R -cell clones prevents expansion of T E -cell clones driven by body antigens, and a more diverse subset of T E -cell clones remains uncontrolled by T R cells, which allows the setup of immune responses against harmful pathogens. This repertoire pattern seems then the most adequate to represent a healthy immune system. For each emergent repertoire pattern, clear and testable predictions are given for different properties related to the diversity of T E and T R cells. For the most adequate repertoire pattern, a higher diversity of T E cells than of T R cells is expected as** well as a negative correlation between clonal size distributions for clones belonging to the overlapping repertoire. These predictions can then be compared to available data on T cell receptor diversity.

Keywords

Cell Clone Peripheral Regulatory Resident Population Incomplete Penetrance Cell Repertoire 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia (grants PTDC/SAU-MII/71402/2006) and a fellowship to NS (SFRH/BD/19810/2004). The authors would like to thank Prof. Ramit Mehr (Bar-Ilan University) for many comments on an early version of this paper.

References

  1. 1.
    Hori S, Nomura T, Sakaguchi S (2003) Control of regulatory T cell development by the transcription factor Foxp3. Science 299:1057–1061PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Fontenot JD, Gavin MA, Rudensky AY (2003) Foxp3 programs the development and function of CD4 + CD25 +  regulatory T cells. Nat Immunol 4:330–336PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Sakaguchi S, Sakaguchi N, Shimizu J, Yamazaki S, Sakihama T, Itoh M, Kuniyasu Y, Nomura T, Toda M, Takahashi T (2001) Immunologic tolerance maintained by CD25 +  CD4 +  regulatory T cells: their common role in controlling autoimmunity, tumor immunity, and transplantation tolerance. Immunol Rev 182:18–32PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Mills KHG (2004) Regulatory T cells: friend or foe in immunity to infection? Nat Rev Immunol 4:841–855PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Belkaid Y (2007) Regulatory T cells and infection: a dangerous necessity. Nat Rev Immunol 7:875–888PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hsieh CS, Liang Y, Tyznik AJ, Self SG, Liggitt D, Rudensky AY (2004) Recognition of the peripheral self by naturally arising CD25 +  CD4 +  T cell receptors. Immunity 21:267–277PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hsieh CS, Zheng Y, Liang Y, Fontenot JD, Rudensky AY (2006) An intersection between the self-reactive regulatory and nonregulatory T cell receptor repertoires. Nat Immunol 7:401–410PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Pacholczyk R, Ignatowicz H, Kraj P, Ignatowicz L (2006) Origin and T cell receptor diversity of Foxp3 + CD4 + CD25 +  T cells. Immunity 25:249–259PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Pacholczyk R, Kern J, Singh N, Iwashima M, Kraj P, Ignatowicz L (2007) Nonself-antigens are the cognate specificities of Foxp3 +  regulatory T cells. Immunity 27:493–504PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Wong J, Obst R, Correia-Neves M, Losyev G, Mathis D, Benoist C (2007) Adaptation of TCR repertoires to self-peptides in regulatory and nonregulatory CD4 +  T cells. J Immunol 178:7032–7041PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Sakaguchi S, Sakaguchi N, Asano M, Itoh M, Toda M (1995) Immunologic self-tolerance maintained by activated T cells expressing IL-2 receptor alpha-chains (CD25). Breakdown of a single mechanism of self-tolerance causes various autoimmune diseases. J Immunol 155: 1151–1164Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Sakaguchi S, Wing K, Miyara M (2007) Regulatory T cells - a brief history and perspective. Eur J Immunol 37:S116–S123PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Modigliani Y, Bandeira A, Coutinho A (1996) A model for developmentally acquired thymus-dependent tolerance to central and peripheral antigens. Immunol Rev 149:155–200PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    van Santen HM, Benoist C, Mathis D (2004) Number of Treg cells that differentiate does not increase upon encounter of agonist ligand on thymic epithelial cells. J Exp Med 200:1221–1230PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Mason D (1998) A very high level of crossreactivity is an essential feature of the T-cell receptor. Immunol Today 19:395–404PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Carneiro J, León K, Caramalho I, van den Dool C, Gardner R, Oliveira V, Bergman ML, Sepúlveda N, Paixao T, Faro J, Demengeot J (2007) When three is not a crowd: a Crossregulation model of the dynamics and repertoire selection of regulatory CD4 +  T cells. Immunol Rev 216:48–68PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    León K, Peréz R, Lage A, Carneiro J (2000) Modelling T-cell-mediated suppression dependent on interactions in multicellular conjugates. J Theor Biol 207:231–254PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    León K, Peréz R, Lage A, Carneiro J (2001) Three-cell interactions in T cell-mediated suppression? A mathematical analysis of its quantitative implications. J Immunol 166:5356–5365PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    León K, Lage A, Carneiro J (2003) Tolerance and immunity in a mathematical model of T-cell mediated suppression. J Theor Biol 225:107–126PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    León K, Faro J, Lage A, Carneiro J (2004) Inverse correlation between the incidences of autoimmune disease and infection predicted by a model of T cell mediated tolerance. J Autoimmun 22:31–42PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    León K, Garcia K, Carneiro J, Lage A (2007) How regulatory CD25 + CD4 +  T cells impinge on tumor immunobiology: the differential response of tumors to therapies. J Immunol 179:5659–5668PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Fouchet D, Regoes R (2008) A population dynamics analysis of the interaction between adaptive regulatory T cells and antigen presenting cells. PLoS ONE 3:e2306PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Stirk ER, Molina-París C, van den Berg HA (2008) Stochastic niche structure and diversity maintenance in the T cell repertoire. J Theor Biol 255:237–249PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Carneiro J, Paixao T, Milutinovic D, Sousa J, León K, Gardner R, Faro J (2005) Immunological self-tolerance: lessons from mathematical modeling. J Comput Appl Math 184:77–100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Carneiro J, Coutinho A, Faro J, Stewart J (1996) A model of the immune network with B-T cell cooperation I - prototypical structures and dynamics. J Theor Biol 182:513–529PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Zelenay S, Lopes-Carvalho T, Caramalho I, Moraes-Fontes MF, Rebelo M, Demengeot J (2005) Foxp3 +  CD25- CD4 T cells constitute a reservoir of committed regulatory cells that regain CD25 expression upon homeostatic expansion. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 102:4091–4096PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Freitas AA, Rocha B (2000) Population biology of lymphocytes: the flight for survival. Annu Rev Immunol 18:83–111PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    de Boer RJ, Perelson AS (1994) T cell repertoires and competitive exclusion. J Theor Biol 169:375–390PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    de Boer RJ, Perelson AS (1997) Competitive control of the self-renewing T cell repertoire. Int Immunol 9:779–790PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Brunkow ME, Jeffery EW, Hjerrild KA, Paeper B, Clark LB, Yasayko SA, Wilkinson JE, Galas D, Ziegler SF, Ramsdell F (2001) Disruption of a new forkhead/winged-helix protein, scurfin, results in the fatal lymphoproliferative disorder of the scurfy mouse. Nat Genet 27:68–73PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Bensinger SJ, Bandeira A, Jordan MS, Caton AJ, Laufer TM (2001) Major histocompatibility complex class ii-positive cortical eptihelium mediates the selection of CD4 + 25 +  immunoregulatory T cells. J Exp Med 194:427–438PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Sepúlveda N (2009) How is the T-cell repertoire shaped? PhD thesis, University of PortoGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Venturi V, Kedzierska K, Tanaka MM, Turner SJ, Doherty PC, Davenport MP (2008) Method for assessing the similarity between subsets of the T cell receptor repertoire. J Immunol Methods 329:67–80PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Dejaco C, Duftner C, Schirmer M (2006) Are regulatory T cells linked with aging? Exp Gerontol 41:339–345PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Nishioka T, Shimizu J, Yamazaki S, Sakaguchi S (2006) CD4 + CD25 + Foxp3 +  T cells and CD4 + CD25 − Foxp3 +  T cells in aged mice. J Immunol 176:6586–6593PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Dowling MR, Hodgkin PD (2009) Why does the thymus involute? A selection-based hypothesis. Trends Immunol 30:295–300PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Thorstenson KM, Khoruts A (2001) Generation of anergic and potentially immunoregulatory CD25 + CD4 T cells in vivo after induction of peripheral tolerance with intravenous or oral antigen. J Immunol 167:188–195PubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Apostolou I, von Boehmer H (2004) In vivo instruction of suppressor commitment in naive T cells. J Exp Med 199:1401–1408PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    de Lafaille MAC, Lino AC, Kutchukhidze N, Lafaille JJ (2004) CD25- T cells generate CD25 + Foxp3 +  regulatory T cells by peripheral expansion. J Immunol 173:7259–7268PubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Annacker O, Pimenta-Araujo R, Burlen-Defranoux O, Bandeira A (2001) On the ontogeny and physiology of regulatory T cells. Immunol Rev 182:5–17PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Asano M, Toda M, Sakaguchi N, Sakaguchi S (1996) Autoimmune disease as a consequence of developmental abnormality of a T cell subpopulation. J Exp Med 184:387–396PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Gregersen PK, Behrens T (2006) Genetics of autoimmune diseases – disorders of immune homeostasis. Nat Rev Genet 7:917–928PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Anderson M, Bluestone J (2005) The nod mouse: a model of immune dysregulation. Annu Rev Immunol 23:447–485PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Sepúlveda N, Paulino CD, Carneiro J, Penha-Gonçalves C (2007) Allelic penetrance approach as a tool to model two-locus interaction in complex binary traits. Heredity 99:173–184PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Sepúlveda N, Paulino C, Penha-Gonçalves C (2009) Bayesian analysis of allelic penetrance models for complex binary traits. Comput Stat Data Anal 53:1271–1283CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Alper CA, Awdeh Z (2000) Incomplete penetrance of MHC susceptibility genes. Tissue Antigens 56:199–206PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Alper CA, Husain Z, Larsen CE, Dubey DP, Stein R, Day C, Baker A, Beyan H, Hawa M, Ola TO, Leslie RD (2006) Incomplete penetrance of susceptibility genes for MHC-determined immunoglobulin deficiencies in monozygotic twins discordant for type diabetes. J Autoimmun 27:89–95PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Hohler T, Hug R, Schneider PM, Krummenauer F, Gripenberg-Lerche C, Granfors K, Merker-Hermann E (1999) Ankylosing spondylitis in monozygotic twins: studies on immunological parameters. Ann Rheum Dis 58:435–440PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Haegert DG, Galutira D, Murray TJ, O’Connor P, Gadag V (2003) Identical twins discordant for multiple sclerosis have a shift in their T-cell receptor repertoire. Clin Exp Immunol 134:532–537PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Ferreira C, Singha Y, Furmanskia AL, Wong FS, Gardena OA, Dysona J (2009) Non-obese diabetic mice select a low-diversity repertoire of natural regulatory T cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 106:8320–8325PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Lathrop SK, Santacruz NA, Pham D, Luo J, Hsieh CS (2008) Antigen-specific peripheral shaping of the natural regulatory T cell population. J Exp Med 205:3105–3117PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Magurran AE, Henderson PA (2003) Explaining the excess of rare species in natural species abundance distributions. Nature 422:714–716PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Sepúlveda N, Paulino CD, Carneiro J (2008) Diversity of regulatory and effector T lymphocytes (in portuguese). In: Hill MM, Ferreira MA, Dias JG, Salgueiro MF, Carvalho H, Vicente P, Braumann CA (eds) Estatística: da Teoria à Prática. SPE editions, pp 513–523Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Instituto Gulbenkian de CiênciaOeirasPortugal

Personalised recommendations