Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Analyzing Collaborative Interactions with Data Mining Methods for the Benefit of Learning

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Analyzing Interactions in CSCL

Part of the book series: Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning Series ((CULS,volume 12))

Abstract

In this paper, we attempt to relate types of change processes that are prevalent in groups to types of models that might be employed to represent these processes. Following McGrath’s analysis of the nature of change processes in groups and teams, we distinguish between development, adaptation, group activity, and learning. We argue that for the case where groups act as activity systems (i.e., attempt to achieve common goals in a co-ordinated manner involving planning and division of labour), the notion of a group process needs to take into account multiple types of causality and requires a holistic formal representation. Minimally, a process needs to be conceived on the level of patterns of sequences, but in many cases discrete event model formalisms might be more appropriate. We then survey various methods for process analysis with the goal to find formalization types that are suitable to model change processes that occur in activity systems. Two types of event-based process analysis are discussed in more depth: the first one works with the view of a process as a sequence pattern, and the second one sees a process as an even more holistic and designed structure: a discrete event model. For both cases, we provide examples for event-based computational methods that proved useful in analyzing typical CSCL log files, such as those resulting from asynchronous interactions (we focus on wikis), the those resulting from synchronous interactions (we focus on chats).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Abbott, A. (1988). Transcending general linear theory. Sociological Theory, 6, 169–186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Abbott, A. (1990). Conceptions of time and events in social science methods: Causal and narrative approaches. Historical Methods, 23, 140–150.

    Google Scholar 

  • Abbott, A., & Hrycak, A. (1990). Measuring resemblance in sequence data: An optimal matching analysis of musicians’ careers. The American Journal of Sociology, 96, 144–185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Abell, P. (1987). The syntax of social life: The theory and method of comparative narratives. Oxford: Clarendon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Agrawal, R., & Srikant, R. (1995). Mining sequential patterns. Paper presented at the Proceedings of International Conference on Data Engineering (ICDE95).

    Google Scholar 

  • Argote, L., & Ingram, P. (2000). Knowledge transfer: A basis for competitive advantage in firms. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 82(1), 150–169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aristotle (1941). The basic works of Aristotle. In: R. McKeon (Ed.), New York: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arrow, H., McGrath, J. E., & Behrdal, J. (2000). Small groups as complex systems: Formation, co-ordination, development and adaptation. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bales, R. F., & Strodtbeck, F. L. (1951). Phases in group problem solving. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 46, 485–495.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buitelaar, P., Cimiano, P., & Magnini, B. (Eds.). (2005). Ontology learning from text: Methods, evaluation and applications. Amsterdam: IOS Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cassandras, C. G. (1993). Discrete event systems. Homewood: Richard D. Irwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dillenbourg, P., Baker, M., Blaye, A., & O’Malley, C. (1995). The Evolution of Research on Collaborative Learning. In P. Reimann & H. Spada (Eds.), Learning in humans and machines: Towards an interdisciplinary learning science (pp. 189–211). London: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Emirbayer, M., & Mische, A. (1998). What is agency? The American Journal of Sociology, 103(4), 962–1023.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Engeström, Y. (1987). Learning by expanding: An activity-theoretical approach to developmental research. Helsinki: Orienta-Konsultit Oy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engeström, Y. (1999). Activity theory and individual and social transformation. In Y. Engestroem, R. Miettinen, & R.-L. Punanmäki (Eds.), Perspectives on activity theory (pp. 19–38). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Gersick, C. J. G. (1988). Time and transition in work teams: Toward a new model of group development. Academy of Management Journal, 31, 9–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gill, A. (1962). Introduction to the Theory of Finite-state Machines. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giudici, P., & Passerone, G. (2002). Data mining of association structures to model consumer behaviour. Computational Statistics and Data Analysis, 38(4), 533–541.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gollwitzer, P. M. (1986). Action phases and mind-sets. In R. M. Sorrentino & E. T. Higgins (Eds.), Handbook of motivation and cognition (pp. 53–92). New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gouran, D. S., & Hirokawa, R. Y. (1996). Functional theory and comunication in decision-making and problem-solving groups: An expanded view. In R. Y. Hirokawa & M. S. Poole (Eds.), Communication and group decision making (pp. 55–80). Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Han, J., & Kamber, M. (2001). Data mining: Concepts and techniques. San Francisco: Morgan Kaufman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jermann, P., Soller, A., & Muehlenbrock, M. (2001). From mirroring to guiding: a review of the state of the art technology for supporting collaborative learning. In P. Dillenbourg, A. Eurelings, & K. Hakkarainen (Eds.), European perspectives on computer-supported learning (pp. 324–331). Maastricht: University of Maastricht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kapur, M., Hung, D., Jacobson, M. J., Voiklis, J., Kinzer, C. K., & Victor, C. D.-T. (2007). Emergence of learning in computer-supported, large-scale collective dynamics: A research agenda. Proceedings of the International Conference on Computer-supported Collaborative Learning (CSCL2007). New Brunswick, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaufman, L., & Rousseeuw, P. J. (1990). Finding groups in data. An introduction to cluster analysis. New York: Wiley.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kay, J., Maisonneuve, N., Yacef, K., & Reimann, P. (2006). The Big Five and Visualisations for Team Work Activity. In M. Ikeda, K. D. Ashley, & T.-W. Chan (Eds.), Proceedings of intelligent tutoring systems (ITS06) (pp. 197–206). Heidelberg: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Kindler, E., Rubin, V., & Schäfer, W. (2006). Process Mining and Petri Net Synthesis. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Vol. 4103, pp. 105–116). Business Process Management Workshops, Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGrath, J. E., & Argote, L. (2001). Group processes in organizational contexts. In M. A. Hogg & R. S. Tindale (Eds.), Blackwell handbook of social psychology (Vol. 3, pp. 603–627). Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGrath, J. E., & Beehr, T. A. (1990). Time and the stress process: Some temporal issues in the conceptualization and measurement of stress. Stress Medicine, 6, 95–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGrath, J. E., & Tschan, F. (2004). Temporal matters in social psychology: Examining the role of time in the lives of groups and individuals. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • McIntyre, R. M., & Salas, E. (1995). Measuring and managing for team performance: Emerging principles from complex environments. In R. A. Guzzo & E. Salas (Eds.), Team effectiveness and decision making in organizations (pp. 9–45). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merceron, A., & Yacef, K. (2005). TADA-Ed for Educational Data Mining. Interactive Multimedia Electronic Journal of Computer-Enhanced Learning, 7(1), http://imej.wfu.edu/articles/2005/2001/2003/index.asp.

  • Mohr, L. (1982). Explaining organizational behavior. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Monge, P. R. (1990). Theoretical and analytical issues in studying organizational processes. Organization Science, 1(4), 406–430.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muukkonen, H., Hakkarainen, K., Konsonen, K., Jalonen, S., Heikkil, A., Lonka, K., et al. (2007). Process- and context-sensitive research on academic knowledge practices: Developing CASS-tools and methods. In C. Chinn, G. Erkens, & S. Puntambekar (Eds.), Minds, mind, and society. Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Computer-supported Collaborative Learning (CSCL 2007) (pp. 541–543). New Brunswick: International Society of the Learning Sciences.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perera, D., Kay, J., Koprinska, I., Yacef, K., & Zaiane, O. (2008). Clustering and sequential pattern mining of online collaborative learning data. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 21(6), 759–772.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poole, M. S., & Doelger, J. A. (1986). Developmental processes in group decision-making. In R. Hirokawa & M. S. Poole (Eds.), Communication and group decision-making (pp. 35–62). Berverly Hills: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poole, M. S., & Holmes, M. E. (1995). Decision development in computer-assisted group decision making. Human Communication Research, 22(1), 90–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poole, M. S., van de Ven, A., Dooley, K., & Holmes, M. E. (2000). Organizational change and innovation processes. Theories and methods for research. New Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reimann, P. (2007). Time is precious: Why process analysis is essential for CSCL (and also can help to bridge between experimental and descriptive methods). In C. Chinn, G. Erkens, & S. Puntambekar (Eds.), Minds, minds, and society. Proceedings of the Computer-supported Collaborative Learning Conference (CSCL 2007) (pp. 598–607). New Brunswick: International Society of the Learning Sciences.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reimann, P., Frerejean, J., & Thompson, K. (2009). Using process mining to identify models of group decision making processes in chat data. In C. O’Malley, D. Suthers, P. Reimann, & A. Dimitracopoulou (Eds.), Computer-supported collaborative learning practives: CSCL2009 conference proceedings (pp. 98–107). International Society for the Learning Sciences.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reisig, W. (1985). Petri Nets. An introduction. Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salas, E., Sims, D. E., & Burke, C. S. (2005). Is there a “Big Five” in teamwork? Small Group Research, 36(5), 555–599.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sanderson, P. M., & Fisher, C. (1994). Exploratory sequential data analysis: Foundations. Human-Computer Interaction, 9(3/4), 251–317.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schümmer, T., Strijbos, J.-W., & Berkel, T. (2005). A new direction for log file analysis in CSCL: Experiences with a spatio-temporal metric. In T. Koschmann, D. Suthers, & T. W. Chan (Eds.), Computer Supported Collaborative Learning 2005: The next 10 years! (pp. 567–576). Mahwah: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Searle, J. R., Kiefer, F., & Bierwisch, M. (1980). Speech act theory and pragmatics. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Sterman, J. D. (2000). Business dynamics. Systems thinking and modeling for a complex world. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suthers, D. D. (2006). A qualitative analysis of collaborative knowledge construction through shared representations. Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, 1(2), 115–142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tuckman, B. W. (1965). Developmental sequences in small groups. Psychological Bulletin, 65, 384–399.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tuckman, B. W., & Jensen, M. A. C. (1977). Stages of small-group development revisited. Group and Organizational Studies, 2, 419–427.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van der Aalst, W. M. P., & Günther, C. W. (2007). Finding structure in unstructured processes: the case of process mining. In T. Basten, G. Juhas, & S. Shukla (Eds.), Proceedings the 7th International Conference on Applications of Concurrency to System Design (ACSD 2007; Bratislava, Slovak Republic) (pp. 3–12). Los Alamitos: IEEE Computer Society Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weijters, A. J. M. M., Aalst, W. M. P. V. D., & Medeiros, A. K. A. D. (2006). Process mining with the heuristics miner-algorithm. BETA Working Paper Series WP 166. Eindhoven: Eindhoven University of Technology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weinberger, A., & Fischer, F. (2006). A framework to analyze argumentative knowledge construction in computer-supported collaborative learning. Computers & Education, 46(1), 71–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wheelan, S. A. (1994). Group processes: A developmental perspective. Sydney: Allyn & Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zumbach, J., & Reimann, P. (2003). Influence of feedback on distributed problem based learning. Paper presented at the CSCL 2003 conference, June 15th to 18th, Bergen, Norway.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research has been supported by a Discovery Grant from the Australian Research Council.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. The Faculty of Education and Social Work, University of Sydney, Education Building A35.252, Sydney, NSW, 2006, Australia

    Peter Reimann

Authors
  1. Peter Reimann
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Kalina Yacef
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Judy Kay
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Peter Reimann .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Wisconsin Center for Education Research, University of Wisconsin-Madison, W. Johnson Street 1025, Madison, 53706-1796, Wisconsin, USA

    Sadhana Puntambekar

  2. Dept. Educational Sciences, Utrecht University, Heidelberglaan 2, Utrecht, 3584 CS, Netherlands

    Gijsbert Erkens

  3. Graduate School of Education, Rutgers University, Seminary Place 10, New Brunswick, 08901, New Jersey, USA

    Cindy Hmelo-Silver

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Reimann, P., Yacef, K., Kay, J. (2011). Analyzing Collaborative Interactions with Data Mining Methods for the Benefit of Learning. In: Puntambekar, S., Erkens, G., Hmelo-Silver, C. (eds) Analyzing Interactions in CSCL. Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning Series, vol 12. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-7710-6_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation