Advertisement

Employing Virtual Collaborative Exchanges to Expand Global Awareness

A Multi-discipline, Three-Year Effort
  • Sandra PoindexterEmail author
  • Ray Amtmann
  • Tawni Ferrarini
Chapter

Abstract

Universities commonly mention global components in their mission statements. Many governments endorse the concept of global preparedness for its industry and people, and support student and faculty mobility. Yet not all students have the resources or motivation to study abroad, though still value an international experience. This 3-year study, based in the United States and Finland, explores the use of the Internet to connect university students in equivalent classes across international borders, completing collaborative assignments requiring student-student virtual dialog and cross-cultural reflection. After 10 repetitions of virtual exchanges between U.S. and European undergraduate students, quantitative and qualitative results indicate that virtual exchanges, like actual student exchanges, can provide learning opportunities for global awareness. Students, regardless of prior international experience, recommend virtual exchanges. No single pedagogy achieves 100% success and improvements are underway. This paper identifies virtual exchange goals, describes pedagogical activities, presents results, identifies areas for improvement and offers research suggestions. The approach can apply to any discipline at any level. Faculty hesitant about either technology or interference with course structure may be motivated to try this easy-to-use, cost-effective pedagogy to broaden global perspectives that can be scaled up, down, or custom-tailored.

Keywords

Collaborative learning Virtual exchanges Global awareness International teams International collaboration 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to acknowledge participating instructors from Haaga-Helia University of Applied Sciences of Helsinki, Finland.

References

  1. Andone, D., & Frydenberg, M. (2009). One idea, one ocean, two countries and tens of students the implications of virtual mobility. Proceedings of IADIS international conference on cognition and exploratory learning in digital age (CELDA 2009) (pp. 388–391), Rome, Italy.Google Scholar
  2. Campbell, N. (2008). You’ve got mail! Using email technology to enhance intercultural communication learning. Journal of Intercultural Communication, 16. Retrieved September 2008, from http://www.immi.se/intercultural
  3. Daniels, M., Petre, M., Almstrum, V., Asplund, L., Björkman, C., Erikson, et al. (1998). RUNESTONE, an international student collaboration project. Proceedings of IEEE 1998 Frontiers in education conference (pp. 727–732), Tempe, AZ, doi:10.1109/FIE.1998.738780Google Scholar
  4. Institute of International Education. (2009). Open Doors 2009 Report on International Educational Exchange. New York: Institute of International Education, Table 22. Retrieved November 2009, from http://opendoors.iienetwork.org Google Scholar
  5. Johnson, L., Levine, A., & Smith, R. (2008). 2008 Horizon report, Austin, TX: The new media consortium, 6. Retrieved January 2010, from http://www.nmc.org/horizon Google Scholar
  6. Kiesliinger, B., & Fiedler, S. (2006). iCamp: A cross-cultural research approach for a cross-cultural learning design. Proceedings of the third international conference on eLearning for knowledge-based society, Bangkok, Thailand. Retrieved from http://www.icamp.eu/wp-content/uploads/2007/05/ap06_paper_final.pdf
  7. Last, M., Daniels, M., Hause, M., & Woodroffe, M. (2002). Learning from students: Continuous improvement in international collaboration. Annual Joint Conference Integrating Technology into Computer Science Education: Proceedings of the 7th annual conference on innovation and technology in computer science education (pp.136–140), Aarhus, Denmark.Google Scholar
  8. Levy, M. (2007). Culture, culture learning and new technologies: Towards a pedagogical framework. Language Learning and Technology, 11(2), 104–127. Retrieved from http://llt.msu.edu/vol11num2/levy Google Scholar
  9. National Center for Education Statistics. (2008). Digest of education statistics: 2008. Washington, DC: Institute of Education Sciences, Table 189. Retrieved from http://nces.ed.gov/programs/digest/d08 Google Scholar
  10. Nguyen-Ngoc, A. V., & Law, E. (2007). Evaluation of cross-cultural computer-supported collaborative learning: Preliminary findings for iCamp challenges. Proceedings of the world conference on educational multimedia. Hypermedia and telecommunications 2007 (pp. 1887–1996), Vancouver, Canada.Google Scholar
  11. O’Dowd, R. (2003). Understanding the ‘Other Side’: Intercultural learning in a spanish-english e-mail exchange. Language, Learning and Technology, 7(3), 118–144.Google Scholar
  12. Office of Postsecondary Education. (2010). U.S. Department of education. Retrieved from http://www.ed.gov/about/offices/list/ope
  13. Teng, Y-W. (2005). A cross-cultural communication experience at a higher education institution in Taiwan. Journal of Intercultural Communication, 10. Retrieved from http://www.immi.se/intercultural

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sandra Poindexter
    • 1
    Email author
  • Ray Amtmann
    • 2
  • Tawni Ferrarini
    • 2
  1. 1.College of Business, Northern Michigan UniversityMarquetteUSA
  2. 2.Northern Michigan UniversityMarquetteUSA

Personalised recommendations