Pedagogy and Content Knowledge Based Podcasting Project for Preservice Teachers

  • Junko YamamotoEmail author


This study examines the impact of an instruction based on the technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) framework on podcasting and vodcasting for preservice teachers in the United States. Podcasting and vodcasting enhances public school learners’ creativity and critical thinking as well as verbal skills. Preservice teachers enrolled in teacher preparation programs benefit from learning pedagogical reasons to implement podcasting and vodcasting. However, the conceptual knowledge is not enough. They should also have the technology skills to facilitate them in the context of the subject they are teaching. The result indicates that the research participants developed positive attitudes towards using podcasting and vodcasting in their classrooms after the instructional sequences.


Podcasting Vodcasting Preservice teacher TPACK 



The author thanks Dr. Richard Altenbaugh for formative feedback and Dr. John K. Hicks for proofreading.


  1. Beckner, C., Blythe, R., Bybee, J., Christensen, M. H., Croft, W., Ellis, N. C., et al. (2009). Language is a complex adaptive system: Position paper. Language Learning, 59(1), 1–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Calandra, B., Brantley-Dias, L., Lee, J. K., & Fox, D. L. (2009). Using video editing to cultivate novice teachers’ practice. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 42(1), 73–94.Google Scholar
  3. Dresang, E. T. (1999). Radical change: Books for youth in a digital age. New York: The H. W. Wilson Company.Google Scholar
  4. Dörnyei, Z., & Kormos, J. (2000). The role of individual and social variables in oral task performance. Language Teaching Research, 4(3), 275–300.Google Scholar
  5. Egbert, J. (2009). Supporting learning with technology: Essentials of classroom practice. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  6. Ewald, J. D. (2007). Foreign language learning anxiety in upper-level classes: Involving students as researchers. Foreign Language Annals, 40(1), 122–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Fisher, D., Frey, N., & Rothenberg, C. (2008). Content-area conversations: How to plan discussion-based lessons for diverse language learners. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.Google Scholar
  8. Guilloteaux, M. J., & Dörnyei, Z. (2008). Motivating language learners: A classroom-oriented investigation of the effects of motivational strategies on student motivation. TESOL Quarterly, 42(1), 55–77.Google Scholar
  9. Guzey, S. S., & Roehrig, G. H. (2009). Teaching science with technology: Case studies of science teachers’ development of technology, pedagogy, and content knowledge. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 9(1), 25–45.Google Scholar
  10. Harris, J., & Hofer, M. (2009). Grounded tech integration. Learning & Leading with Technology, 37 (2), 22–25.Google Scholar
  11. Harris, J., Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. (2009). Teachers’ technological pedagogical content knowledge and learning activity types: Curriculum-based technology integration reframed. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 41(4), 393–416.Google Scholar
  12. Hofer, M., & Swan, K. O. (2008). Technological pedagogical content knowledge in action: A case study of a middle school digital documentary project. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 41(2), 179–200.Google Scholar
  13. Hung, H. T. (2009). Learners’ perceived value of video as mediation in foreign language learning. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 18(2), 171–190.Google Scholar
  14. Kebritchi, M. (2010). Factors affecting teachers’ adoption of educational computer games: A case study. British Journal of Educational Technology, 41(2), 256–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Keengwe, J., Onchwari, G., & Wachira, P. (2008). The use of computer tools to support meaningful learning. AACE Journal, 16(1), 77–92.Google Scholar
  16. Koehler, M. J., & Mishra, P. (2005). What happens when teachers design educational technology? The development of technological pedagogical content knowledge. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 32(2), 131–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Koehler, M. J., & Mishra, P. (2008). Introducing TPCK. In AACTE Committee on Innovation and Technology (Ed.), Handbook of technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPCK) for educators. New York: Routledge. 1–29.Google Scholar
  18. Lambert, J., & Cuper, P. (2008). Multimedia technologies and familiar spaces: 21st-century teaching for 21st century learners. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 8(3), 264–276.Google Scholar
  19. Lee, M. J. W., McLoughlin, C., & Chan, A. (2008). Talk the talk: Learner-generated podcasts as catalysts for knowledge creation. British Journal of Educational Technology, 39(3), 501–521.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Lei, J. (2009). Digital natives as preservice teachers: What technology preparation is needed? Journal of Computing in Teacher Education, 25(3), 87–97.Google Scholar
  21. Lei, Q. (2007). EFL teachers’ factors and students’ affect. US-China Education Review, 4(3), 60–67.Google Scholar
  22. Lloyd, M. M., & Albion, P. R. (2009). Altered geometry: A new angle on teacher technophobia. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 17(1), 65–84.Google Scholar
  23. Lord, G. (2008). Podcasting communities and second language pronunciation. Foreign Language Annals, 41(2), 364–379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Luce-Kapler, R. (2007). Radical change and wikis: Teaching new literacies. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 51(3), 214–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017–1054.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. (2009). Too cool for school? No way! Learning & Leading with Technology, 36(7), 14–18.Google Scholar
  27. Niess, M. L. (2008). Guiding preservice teachers in developing TPCK. In AACTE Committee on Innovation and Technology (Ed.), Handbook of technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPCK) for educators. New York: Routledge. 223–250.Google Scholar
  28. Niess, M. L., Ronau, R. N., Shafer, K. G., Driskell, S. O., Harper, S. R., Johnston, C., et al. (2009). Mathematics teacher TPACK standards and development model. Contemporary Issues in Technology in Teacher Education, 9(1), 4–24.Google Scholar
  29. Pantaleo, S. (2006). Readers and writers as intertexts: Exploring the intertextualities in student writing. Australian Journal of Language and Literacy, 29(2), 163–181.Google Scholar
  30. Thompson, P. (2008). Learning through extended talk. Language and Education, 22(3), 241–256.Google Scholar
  31. Unsworth, L. (2008). Multiliteracies, e-literature and english teaching. Language and Education, 22(1), 62–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Zarra, E. J., III. (2009). Wired up and fired up: Secondary social studies and the teenage brain. Social Studies Review, 48(1), 68–70.Google Scholar
  33. Ziglari, L. (2008). The role of interaction in L2 acquisition: An emergentist perspective. European Journal of Scientific Research, 23(3), 446–453.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Slippery Rock University of PennsylvaniaSlippery RockUSA

Personalised recommendations