Advertisement

Leaders for the Twenty-First Century: Preparation, Experiences, and Roles in Technology Implementation

  • Lynne SchrumEmail author
  • Lyndsie M. Galizio
  • Mary C. English
  • Patrick Ledesma
Chapter

Abstract

This research sought to understand perspectives of tech-savvy administrators from the US in regards to how they learned what they know and how they lead their schools in the twenty-first century. It explored this issue in light of gathered information about targeted other countries’ requirements for administrator preparation. Looking through the lens of Fullan (1991), a mixed-methods survey gathered a sample of US leaders’ perspectives. Findings indicate that most leaders have not been formally prepared to implement technology systemically in their school; rather, those with skills in this area have learned on their own or through other educational experiences. Successful tech-savvy leaders purposefully set goals for their school, serve as role models, and support professional development for staff.

Keywords

Leadership Technology implementation Change process Preparation of leaders 

References

  1. Bogler, R. (2001). The influence of leadership style on teacher job satisfaction. Educational Administration Quarterly, 37(5), 662–683.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Casey, H. B., & Rakes, G. C. (2002). An analysis of the influences of technology training on teacher stages of concern regarding the use of instructional technology in schools. Journal of Computing in Teacher Education, 18(4), 124–132.Google Scholar
  3. Dawson, C., & Rakes, G. (2003). The influence of principals’ technology training on the integration of technology into schools. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 36(1), 29–49.Google Scholar
  4. Ertmer, P. A. (2005). Teacher pedagogical beliefs: The final frontier in our quest for technology integration? Educational Technology Research and Development, 53(4), 25–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Fullan, M. (2007). Leading in a culture of change (Rev. ed.). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  6. Fullan, M. (1991). The new meaning of educational change (3rd ed.). New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  7. Hess, F. M., & Kelly, A. P. (2007). Learning to lead: What gets taught in principal-preparation programs? Teachers College Record, 109(1), 244–274.Google Scholar
  8. Holland, L., & Moore-Steward, T. (2000). A different divide: Preparing tech-savvy leaders. Leadership, 30(1), 8–10, 37–38.Google Scholar
  9. Kleiner, B., Thomas, N., & Lewis, L. (2007). Educational Technology in Teacher Education Programs for Initial Licensure (NCES 2008–040). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education.Google Scholar
  10. Lauder, A. (2000). The new look in principal preparation programs. NASSP Bulletin, 84(617), 23–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Leithwood, K. A. (1994). Leadership for school restructuring. Educational Administration Quarterly, 30(4), 498–518.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Leithwood, K., Jantzi, D., Silins, H., & Dart, B. (1993). Using the appraisal of school leaders as an instrument for school restructuring. Peabody Journal of Education, 68(2), 85–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Merriam, S. B. (1998). Qualitative research and case study applications in education (2nd ed.). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  14. Moos, L., & Johansson, O. (2009). The international successful school principalship project: Success sustained? Journal of Educational Administration, 47(6), 765–780.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Murphy, J. (2001). The changing face of leadership preparation. School Administrator, 58(10), 14–17.Google Scholar
  16. National Center for Education Statistics. (2000). Teachers’ tools for the 21st century: A report on teachers’ use of technology. Jessup, MD: U.S. Department of Education.Google Scholar
  17. Portin, B. (2000). The changing urban principalship. Education and Urban Society, 32(4), 492–505.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Ritchie, D. (1996). The administrative role in the integration of technology. National Association of Secondary School Principals. NASSP Bulletin, 80, 42–52.Google Scholar
  19. Schrum, L., & Levin, B. B. (2009). Leading 21st Century Schools: Harnessing Technology for Engagement and Achievement. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.Google Scholar
  20. Sergiovanni, T. J. (2006). The principalship: A reflective practice perspective. Boston: Pearson Education.Google Scholar
  21. Stegall, P. (1998). The principal-key to technology implementation. ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED424614.Google Scholar
  22. Testerman, J. C., Flowers, C. P., & Algozzine, R. (2002). Basic technology competencies of educational administrators. Contemporary Education, 72(2), 58–61.Google Scholar
  23. Wang, L., Ertmer, P. A., & Newby, T. J. (2004). Increasing preservice teachers’ self-efficacy beliefs for technology integration. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 36(3), 231–250.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Lynne Schrum
    • 1
    Email author
  • Lyndsie M. Galizio
    • 2
  • Mary C. English
    • 2
  • Patrick Ledesma
    • 2
  1. 1.George Mason UniversityFairfaxUSA
  2. 2.George Mason UniversityFairfaxUSA

Personalised recommendations